Article published In: Constructing and Negotiating Identity in Dialogue:
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu
[Language and Dialogue 5:1] 2015
► pp. 107–127
Building identity in humorous media interactions
Published online: 23 June 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.1.06mad
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.1.06mad
This article presents an analysis of conversational humour (Attardo 1994) occuring in two Romanian television shows with the purpose of demonstrating that journalists use humour to build their own identity in relation to their interlocutors and to their audience. The types of strategic moves identified in media situational humour are two-fold: one directed at a participant in the conversation, having the potential of biting; the other that is directed at an absent other (in this case, the audience), having the potential of bonding (Boxer and Cortes-Conde 1997, 275). A relational identity is developed among participants in conversational joking which can be identified and described in accordance with the communicative norms and expectations that are considered appropriate in the media context in which individuals interact.
Keywords: identity, bonding, audience., humorous media
References (36)
Archakis, Argiris, and Villy Tsakona. 2012. The Narrative Construction of Identities in Critical Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boxer, Diana, and Florencia Cortes-Conde. 1997. “From Bonding to Biting: Conversational Joking and Identity Display.” Journal of Pragmatics 271: 275–294.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614.
De Fina, Anna. 2011. “Discourse and Identity”. In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 263–282. London: Sage.
Eisenberg, Ann. 1986. “Teasing: a Verbal Play in Two Mexicano Homes.” In Language Socialization Across Cultures, ed. by Bambi B. Schieffelin, and Elinor Ochs, 182–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geyer, Naomi. 2010. “Teasing and Ambivalent Face in Japanese Multi-Party Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2120–2130.
Gruner, Charles R. 1970. “The Effect of Humor in Dull and Interesting Informative Speeches.” Central States Speech Journal 211: 160–166.
Hall, Stuart. 2000. “Who Needs Identity?” In Identity: A Reader, ed. by Paul du Gay, Jessica Evans, and Peter Redman, 15–30. London: Sage and the Open University.
Hogg, Michael A., Deborah J. Terry, and Katherine M. White. 1995. “A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 581: 255–269.
Holmes, Janet. 2006. “Sharing a Laugh: Pragmatic Aspects of Humor and Gender in the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 381: 26–50.
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra. 2002a. “Having a Laugh at Work: How Humour Contributes to Workplace Culture.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1683–1710.
. 2002b. “Humour as a Discursive Boundary Marker in Social Interaction.” In Us and Others. Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses and Cultures, ed. by Anna Duszak, 377–399. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kuipers, Giselinde. 2008. “The Sociology of Humour.” In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. by Victor Raskin, 365–402. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Méndez-Gª de Paredes, Elena. 2013. “Discursive Mechanisms of Informative Humour in Spanish Media.” In Irony and Humour. From Pragmatics to Discourse, ed. by Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, and Maria Belén Alvarado Ortega, 85–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Meyer, John C. 2000. “Humor as a Double-edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication.” Communication Theory 10 (3): 310–331.
Mulkay, Michael J. 1988. On Humor: Its Nature and its Place in Modern Society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Scheufele, Dietram A. 1999. “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication 49 (1): 103–122.
Scheufele, Dietram A., and David Tewksbury. 2007. “Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 9–20.
Schieffelin, Bambi B. 1986. “Teasing and Shaming in Kauli Children’s Interactions.” In Language Socialization Across Cultures, ed. by Bambi B. Schieffelin, and Elinor Ochs, 165–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schnurr, Stephanie. 2009. “Constructing Leader Identities Through Teasing at Work.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1125–1138.
Stets, Jan E., and Peter J. Burke. 2003. “A Sociological Approach to Self and Identity.” In Handbook of Self and Identity, ed. by Mark R. Leary, and June Price, 128–152. New York: Guilford Press.
Wanzer, Melissa B., Melanie Booth-Butterfield, and Steve Booth-Butterfield. 1996. “Are Funny People more Popular: The Relationship of Humor Orientation, Loneliness, and Social Attraction.” Communication Quarterly 441: 42–52.
Zelizer, Craig. 2010. “Laughing our Way to Peace or War: Humour and Peacebuilding” [online article]. Journal of Conflictology 1 (2). Campus for Peace, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. [URL] [Consulted: 28.07. 2014].
Zimmerman, Don H. 1998. “Identity, Context and Interaction.” In Identities in Talk, ed. by Charles Antaki, and Sue Widdicombe, 87–106. London: Sage.
Zimmerman, Don H., and D. Lawrence Wieder. 1970. “Ethnomethodology and the Problem of Order: Comment on Denzin.” In Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge, ed. by Jack D. Douglas, 285–298. Chicago: Aldine.
SOURCE 1. 2011, May 22. Apropo TV Vintage, Pro TV Channel. Cum să devii vedetă în 10 paşi [How to become a star in 10 steps] <[URL]> [consulted: 28.07.2014].
SOURCE 2. 2008, October 16. Teo Show, Pro TV Channel. Prinţul Andrei Raţiu invitat la emisiunea lui Teo Trandafir. [Prince Andrew invited to Teo Trandafir show] <[URL]> [consulted: 28.07.2014].
