Article published In: Constructing and Negotiating Identity in Dialogue:
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu
[Language and Dialogue 5:1] 2015
► pp. 45–61
Dialogic representations of Britishness and Irishness
A pragmatic view
Published online: 23 June 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.1.03ajt
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.1.03ajt
Speakers construct their identities by careful choice of the appropriate linguistic features that will convey the specific social information that identifies them as part of a particular speech community (cf. Riley 2007, Joseph 2004). The social constructionist approach focuses on how social actors use linguistic and other cultural resources in the ongoing construction and re-construction of personal and group identity in interaction. Under such a view, identity (and hence ethnicity) is necessarily dynamic (Schilling-Estes 2004). Recent research on fictional characters and scripted discourse has proved the legitimacy of this scholarly area among language studies (Kozloff 2000, Culpeper 2001, Walshe 2009, Eder et al. 2010, Dynel 2011, Furkó 2013). This paper investigates several possibilities for the dialogic construction of the British and Irish ethnic stereotype. Drawing the distinction between real and fictional characters (Culpeper 2010), the micro-sociolinguistic, pragmalinguistic analysis of my corpora, taken from contemporary cinematographic representations of Britishness and Irishness, aims to compare some of the strategies that interactional partners employ, and which reveal several facets of their identities.
References (45)
Ajtony, Zsuzsanna. 2013. “Various Facets of the English Stereotype in Downton Abbey – A Pragmatic Approach.” Topics in Linguistics 121: 5–14.
Amador Moreno, Carolina P. 2005. “Discourse Markers in Irish English: An Example from Literature.” In The Pragmatics of Irish English, ed. by Anne Barron, and Klaus P. Schneider, 73–100. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Barron, Anne, and Klaus P. Schneider (eds). 2005. The Pragmatics of Irish English. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas Sebeok, 253–276. MIT Press. Reprinted in. Language and Social Context, ed. by P. P. Giglioli, 1972, 219–231. London: Penguin.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 71: 584–614.
Caunce, Stephen et al. 2004. Relocating Britishness. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig. 2007. “On the Pretense Theory of Irony.” In Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader ed. by Raymond Gibbs, and Herbert L. Colston, 25–33. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2001. Language and Characterisation. People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
Dynel, Marta. 2011. “Stranger than Fiction? A Few Methodological Notes on Linguistic Research in Film Discourse.” Brno Studies in English 37 (1): 41–61.
Eder, Jans et al. (eds). 2010. Characters in Fictional Worlds: Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film and Other Media. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Furkó, Bálint Péter. 2013. “Irish English Stereotypes. A Variational Pragmatic Analysis.” Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 5 (2): 123–136.
Heidbrink, Henriette. 2010. “Fictional Characters in Literary and Media Studies: A Survey of the Research.” In Characters in Fictional Worlds: Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film and Other Media, ed. by Jans Eder, 67–110. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hickey, Raymond. 2007. Irish English: History and Present-day Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hornsey, Matthew J. 2008. “Social Identity Theory and Self-categorization Theory: A Historical Review.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2 (1): 204–222.
Joseph, John E. 2004. Language and Identity: National, Ethnic, Religious. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kallen, Jeffrey. 2005. “Silence and Mitigation in Irish English Discourse.” In The Pragmatics of Irish English, ed. by Anne Barron, and Klaus P. Schneider, 47–72. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leerssen, Joep. 2007. “The Poetics and Anthropology of National Character (1500-2000).” In Imagology. The Cultural Construction of Literary Representation of National Characters, ed. by Manfred Beller, and Joep Leerssen, 63–75. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Lucas, John. 1990. England and Englishness. Ideas of Nationhood in English Poetry 1688-1900. London: The Hogarth Press.
Lynch, Sara. 2013. A Corpus Based Analysis of the Presence of ‘Sorry’ in Irish English Discourse. MA Thesis. [URL]. Retrieved 6 June, 2014.
Martin, Gillian. 2005. “Indirectness in Irish-English Business Negotiation: A Legacy of Colonialism?” In The Pragmatics of Irish English, ed. by Anne Barron, and Klaus P. Schneider, 235–268. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Richardson, Kay. 2010. Television Dramatic Dialogue: A Sociolinguistic Study. New York: Oxford University Press.
Riley, Philip. 2007. Language, Culture and Identity. An Ethnolinguistic Perspective. London: Continuum.
Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2004. “Constructing Ethnicity in Interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 8 (2): 163–195.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2007. “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 639–656.
Taraldsøy Østebøvik, Silje. 2010. “Sure it wouldn’t be right”. Sure as a discourse marker in A corpus of Irish English from the 18th to the 20th century. MA dissertation. The University of Bergen. [URL]
Vaughan, Elaine, and Brian Clancy. 2011. “The Pragmatics of Irish English.” English Today 27 (2): 47–52.
