Cover not available

Article published In: Certainty and Uncertainty in Dialogue
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski
[Language and Dialogue 4:1] 2014
► pp. 76–92

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Obama said it

Quoting as an evidential strategy in online discussion forums

 | University of Würzburg, Germany
Published online: 20 May 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.1.05reb
Quoting constitutes a well documented evidential strategy across languages. This article examines an English collection of comments in online political discussion forums, which covers a wide spectrum of patterns with 1) overt stance-taking plus a direct quotation at one end and 2) implicit stance-taking without quotation at the other. The notions of deixis and accountability are used in order to explicate the evidential function of quotations in the practices of stance-taking observed: While pattern 1) achieves participants’ maximum accountability and entitlement to making their claims, pattern 2) is associated with minimum accountability and entitlement. The findings are discussed in light of knowledge management and epistemic authority.
References (25)
Bös, Birte, and Sonja Kleinke. 2012. “Complex Uses of Quotations in English and German Online Discussion Fora.” Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Quotation and Meaning (ICQM 3) , 19-21 April 2012, University of Augsburg.
Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer, and Markus Steinbach. 2011. “Exploring the Meaning of Quotation.” In Understanding Quotation, ed. by Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer, and Markus Steinbach, 1-33. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 1992. “Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News Interview Discourse.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 163-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2006. “Indexing Stance: Reported Speech as an Interactional Evidential.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (5): 569-595. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2007. “Assessing and Accounting.” In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 81-119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: Setting Boundaries.” Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18 (1): 83-101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Encoding Speaker Perspective: Evidentials.” In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, ed. by Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges, and David S. Rood, 379-397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diakopoulos, Nicholas, and Mor Naaman. 2011. “Towards Quality Discourse in Online News Comments.” Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2011) , March 2011.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139-182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Holt. 1988. “Complainable Matters: The Use of Idiomatic Expressions in Making Complaints.” Social Problems 35 (4): 398-417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary C. O’Connor. 1988. “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone.” Language 64 (3): 501-538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. 2001. “Evidentiality: Authority, Responsibility, and Entitlement in English Conversation.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11 (2): 167-192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, Rod. 2007. “The Right Connections: Acknowledging Epistemic Progression in Talk.” Language in Society 36 (3): 319-341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15-38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth. 1996. “Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (3): 219-245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Christa Dürscheid. 2012. “The Linguistics of Keyboard-to-Screen Communication: A New Terminological Framework.” Linguistik Online 56 (6/12): 39–64. [URL] (last accessed 05/12/13)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage. 2006. “The Epistemics of Social Relationships: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society 35 (5): 677-705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reber, Elisabeth. 2012. “Evidentiality in English. A Functional Approach.” Paper presented at the Linguistisches Kolloquium, University of Würzburg, 31 January 2012.
Reber, Elisabeth, and Anita Fetzer. Forthcoming. “Quoting in Political Discourse: Professional Talk Meets Ordinary Postings.” In Quoting Now and Then, ed. by Jenny Arendholz, Monika Kirner, and Wolfram Bublitz. Leiden, et al.: Brill.
Walther, Joseph B., Caleb T. Carr, Scott Seung W. Choi, David C. DeAndrea, Jinsuk Kim, Stephanie Tom Tong, and Brandon Van der Heide. 2010. “Interaction of Interpersonal, Peer, and Media Influence Sources Online: A Research Agenda for Technology Convergence.” In The Networked Self, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi, 17-38. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, H.L. 2011. “Missed Cues: How Disputes Can Socialize Virtual Newcomers.” Language@Internet 8: article 51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, et al.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wooffitt, Robin, and Simon Alistone. 2008. “Participation, Procedure and Accountability: ‘You Said’ Speech Markers in Negotiating Reports of Ambiguous Phenomena.” Discourse Studies 10 (3): 407-427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Kirner-Ludwig, Monika
2023. Book review. Journal of Pragmatics 204 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Gruber, Helmut
2022. When invoked voices blame real politicians. Pragmatics and Society 13:5 ► pp. 793 ff. DOI logo
Kraut, Joshua
2019. The polyphonic pastor. Language and Dialogue 9:3 ► pp. 418 ff. DOI logo
Tabbert, Ulrike
2016. Hypothesising, negation and presenting others’ speech. In Language and Crime, ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue