Cover not available

Article published In: Certainty and Uncertainty in Dialogue
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski
[Language and Dialogue 4:1] 2014
► pp. 58–75

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

I haven’t spoken to him about it

Evidentiality in White House press briefings

 | University of Vechta
Published online: 20 May 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.1.04sch
White House press briefings have the function of providing journalists with first-hand information on present activities of the US-American administration. The Press Secretary, currently Jay Carney, mainly draws on indirect reportative evidentialiy, referring to recent utterances by the President. However, owing to the often critical and persistent inquiries by investigative journalists based on counter-evidentiality, the Press Secretary frequently resorts to evasive manoeuvres. Moreover, he commonly refuses to use logical inferencing in his function as a mouthpiece of the government, since speculations might be potentially harmful when given to the press. Thus, the present paper investigates the possibilities and limitations of evidentiality in this interview genre from a discourse-analytical perspective on the basis of an online archive of transcripts.
References (25)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. “Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 273-312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Philip, and Theo van Leeuwen. 1994. The Media Interview: Confession, Contest, Conversation. Kensington NSW: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Aditi. 2006. “Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Press Conferences.” Discourse & Society 17 (2): 173-203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 261-272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2002. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand. 2005. “Encoding Speaker Perspective: Evidentials.” In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, ed. by Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges, and David S. Rood, 379-397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dendale, Patrick, and Liliane Tasmowski. 2001. “Introduction: Evidentiality and Related Notions.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 339-348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, and Elena Smirnova. 2010. “Evidentiality in European Languages: The Lexical-Grammatical Distinction.” In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabriele Diewald, and Elena Smirnova, 1-14. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekberg, Lena, and Carita Paradis. 2009. “Editorial: Evidentiality in Language and Cognition.” Functions of Language 16 (1): 5-7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2007. “Challenges in Political Interviews: An Intercultural Analysis.” In Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Gerda Lauerbach, 163-195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2010. “Hedging in Political Discourse: The Bush 2007 Press Conferences.” In Perspectives in Politics and Discourse, ed. by Urszula Okulska, and Piotr Cap, 201-213. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1985. “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis: Discourse and Dialogue, vol. 31, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 95-117. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 2006. Media Talk: Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, Xiangying. 2006. “Cross-cultural Pragmatic Differences in US and Chinese Press Conferences: The Case of the North Korea Nuclear Crisis.” Discourse & Society 17 (2): 237-257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2003. “Evidentials: Summation, Questions, Prospects.” InStudies in Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, and Robert M. W. Dixon, 307-327. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2003. The Linguistics of Political Argument: The Spin-doctor and the Wolf-pack at the White House. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. “The Place of Evidentiality within the Universal Grammatical Space.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 349-357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
“Press Briefings.” <[URL]> (last access 23 March 2012).
Summers, Della et al. (eds). 2005. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, 4th ed. München: Langenscheidt-Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Lucchini, Costanza, Andrea Rocci & Johanna Miecznikowski
2025. Managers see, analysts hear. Epistemic divide in financial dialogues. Journal of Pragmatics 248 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Schubert, Christoph
2019. ‘OK, well, first of all, let me say …’: Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary debates. Discourse Studies 21:4 ► pp. 438 ff. DOI logo
Myketiak, Chrystie, Shauna Concannon & Paul Curzon
2017. Narrative perspective, person references, and evidentiality in clinical incident reports. Journal of Pragmatics 117 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue