Article published In: Language and Dialogue
Vol. 3:2 (2013) ► pp.254–272
The role of adversarial discourse in political opposition
Prime Minister’s questions and the British phone-hacking scandal
Published online: 3 September 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.3.2.06bul
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.3.2.06bul
The focus of this study is on the role played by adversarial questioning in political opposition. As an illustrative example, a detailed analysis is presented of two sessions of Prime Minister’s Questions in the UK House of Commons (6 and13 July, 2011), in which the Leader of the Opposition (Ed Miliband) challenged the Prime Minister (David Cameron) regarding his handling of the British phone-hacking scandal. The study is conceptualized in terms of theories of politeness (Brown and Levinson 1978, 1987) and impoliteness (Culpeper 1996), also in terms of the concept of follow-ups (Sinclair and Coulthard 1975). It is argued that this analysis has implications for all three linguistic conceptualizations, furthermore that PMQs, despite its many detractors and deficiencies, can play an important role in sustaining political dialogue and political accountability through adversarial questioning.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Yang, Wei, Syed Nurulakla Syed Abdullah, Lay Hoon Ang & Mingxing Yang
House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu & Yulong Song
Bull, Peter & Maurice Waddle
Sealey, Alison & Stephen Bates
Bull, Peter
2015. Follow-ups in broadcast political discourse. In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 60], ► pp. 3 ff.
Bull, Peter
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
