Article published In: Language and Dialogue
Vol. 1:2 (2011) ► pp.191–206
Metaphor in political dialogue
Published online: 5 January 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.1.2.02mus
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.1.2.02mus
Metaphor and other figurative uses of language play a central role in political dialogue on account of their semantic, pragmatic and textual ‘added value’ effects: they provide an opportunity to introduce new thematic aspects, increase the textual coherence of the dialogue contributions and provide warrants for (analogical) conclusions. One of the oldest examples of metaphor use in political dialogue is the so-called fable of the belly, which tells the story of a dispute between the seemingly ‘lazy’ stomach/ruler and the more ‘active’ body members/citizens over the right to receive food. One of its most famous renditions can be found in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus, where it is embedded in a debate between the character of the senator Menenius and rebellious citizens. This dialogic frame and the dispute ‘within’ the fable establish a multi-layered inter-dialogic pattern. Whilst the literary construction of this dialogue system in Shakespeare’s play is unique, it underlines the more general aspect of metaphor’s dialogic role, which is discussed further with regard to the present-day use of body-based metaphor in political discourse. These case studies are interpreted as evidence for the necessity to integrate this dialogic function as a central aspect in cognitive metaphor analysis.
Keywords: argumentation, body politic, fable, dialogue, metaphor
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Iori, Ilaria
Zhao, Xia, Yi Zheng & Xincheng Zhao
Eaton, Mark Ølholm
Kuznyetsova, Ganna
Ullmann, Stefanie
2020. “Today, the long Arab winter has begun to thaw”. In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87], ► pp. 137 ff.
Yang, Wenhui
Keefer, Lucas A. & Mark J. Landau
Pühringer, Stephan & Katrin Hirte
Heinze, Ulrich
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
