Cover not available

Article published In: Towards Culture(s) of Dialogue: Communicating Unity and Diversity through Language and Discourse
Edited by Urszula Okulska, Grzegorz Kowalski and Urszula Topczewska
[Language and Dialogue 12:2] 2022
► pp. 218–244

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Proximization and dialogue in Internet news texts and comments

 | University of Warsaw
Published online: 8 August 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00123.kow
Abstract
The paper presents the results of an empirical study on proximization approached as a dialogue between journalists and readers of Internet media texts and online comments. In this way the paper shows a practical application of the research programme, whose tenets I presented elsewhere (Kowalski, Grzegorz. 2018. “Proximization as Reception.” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series VII: Social Sciences and Law 11 (60): 125–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), in relation to Polish and Romanian reciprocal media coverage on the winter 2016/2017 protests in the two countries, and follow-up online comments. The analysis shows that participants used proximization for different communicative purposes (descriptive or evaluative), for which they employed different reportoires of proximization strategies (categorization, domestication, construing hybrid IDC/ODC worlds, historical analogies, and references to cultural stereotypes). As a result, there was no consensus on a shared Discourse Space, and alternative Discourse Spaces were negotiated in the online dialogue.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theory and literature review
    • 2.1Proximization theory
    • 2.2Proximization and dialogicity in news discourse
    • 2.3Discourse strategies of proximization
  • 3.Materials
    • 3.1The corpus
    • 3.2Reciprocal media coverage of Poland and Romania
    • 3.3Summary of 2016/2017 protests in Poland and Romania
  • 4.Analysis: Discourse strategies of proximization in Polish and Romanian Internet media texts and media texts’ comments
    • 4.1Categorization
    • 4.2Domestication
    • 4.3Hybrid IDC/ODC worlds
    • 4.4Historical analogies
    • 4.5Dialogue with stereotypes
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (27)
References
Bednarek, Monika and Helen Caple. 2012. News Discourse. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berrocal, Martina. 2017. “Proximizing the Ukraine Conflict: The Case of the United States and the Czech Republic.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13 (2): 327–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010a. Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric, 2nd revised edition. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010b. “Proximizing Objects, Proximizing Values: Towards an Axiological Contribution to the Discourse of Legitimization.” In Perspectives in Politics and Discourse, ed. by Piotr Cap, and Urszula Okulska, 119–142. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Axiological Proximization.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 81–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014a. “Expanding CDS Methodology by Cognitive-Pragmatic Tools: Proximization Theory and Public Space Discourses.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart, and Piotr Cap, 189–210. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Applying Cognitive Pragmatics to Critical Discourse Studies: A Proximization Analysis of Three Public Space Discourses.” Journal of Pragmatics 701: 16–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Crossing Symbolic Distances in Political Discourse Space.” Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3): 313–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “From ‘Cultural Unbelonging’ to ‘Terrorist Risk’: Communicating Threat in the Polish Anti-Immigration Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 15 (3): 285–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavins, Joanna. 2007. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampl, Marek. 2019. “‘Now Is the Time to Root out Evil’: the Role of Natural World Metaphors in the Construction of the ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ Dichotomy.” Brno Studies in English 45 (1): 57–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika. 2015. “Ideology of ‘Here and Now’.” Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3): 347–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kowalski, Grzegorz. 2018. “Proximization as Reception.” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series VII: Social Sciences and Law 11 (60): 125–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, Malcolm N. and Duncan Hunter. 2019. The Discourse of Security: Language, Illiberalism and Governmentality. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sazonova, Yaroslava. 2020. “Linguistic-Pragmatic Means of Filling-in Ontological Lacunas in Blog Texts of Post-Maidan Ukraine.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 11 (2): 41–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. 2008. The Translator’s Invisibility 2nd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werth, Paul. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wieczorek, Anna Ewa. 2013. Clusivity: A New Approach to Association and Dissociation in Political Discourse, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Andersson, Marta
2025. The language of threat. Pragmatics and Society 16:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Hu, Ying & Hongfei Li
2025. Reframing China in U.S. Trade policy discourse: a context-deictic space model for ideological positioning. Frontiers in Communication 10 DOI logo
Porto, M. Dolores & Isabel Alonso Belmonte
2025. Constructing threat through proximization in digital news: A multimodal analysis. Discourse & Society 36:6 ► pp. 926 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Yunyou
2025. The critical cognitive analysis of “hyper-securitization” strategy: A case study of China’s official discourse on the “Japan nuclear contaminated water discharge incident”. Discourse & Society 36:5 ► pp. 725 ff. DOI logo
Pan, Chengcheng
2024. A Digitalized Approach to Discourse Production and Reception from the Perspective of Proximization Theory. In Emerging Technologies for Education [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14606], ► pp. 311 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue