Article published In: When Dialogue Fails
Edited by Anja Müller-Wood
[Language and Dialogue 12:1] 2022
► pp. 150–168
Parity lost
Polyphony, silence, and syncretism between traditional Hobongan and modern cultural practices
Published online: 7 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00116.per
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00116.per
Abstract
Following Bakhtin (e.g., Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1999
[1984]. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, edited and translated
by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press., 184), dialogue studies have
assumed at least some form of parity between dialogic participants. But what happens when parity is significantly disrupted or
lost entirely? In this report of cultural practice among the Hobongan living on the island of Borneo, I examine the results of
lost parity on traditional Hobongan and Christian-influenced cultural practices. The Hobongan typically acknowledge the lack of
parity and ignore it, or they accept the lack of parity and try to rejoin polyphony through conversion. Syncretism presents a more
complex case because dialogue remains possible: both Hobongan and Christian-influenced practices are combined to avoid unpleasant
dialogues.
Keywords: Hobongan, Hovongan, Bakhtin, dialogue, Austronesian
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Definitions
- 1.2Scope and limitations
- 2.Methods
- 3.The Hobongan situation
- 3.1Some geography and history
- 3.2Technology
- 3.3Commerce
- 3.4Religion
- 3.4.1Missionary dialogue
- 3.4.2Hobongan dialogue
- 4.Discussion and conclusion
- Notes
References
References (16)
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1999
[1984]. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, edited and translated
by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Barkham, Patrick. 2008 (9 November). “The
Power of Speech”. The Guardian. [URL]
Conley, William W. 1974. “Kenyah Receptivity and Response
to Christianity.” Sarawak Museum
Journal 22(43): 311–321.
Czaykowska-Higgins, Eva. 2009. “Research
Models, Community Engagement, and Linguistic Fieldwork: Reflections on Working with Canadian Indigenous
Communities.” Language Documentation and
Conservation 3(1): 15–50.
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. 2001. “Places and Peoples: Field Sites
and Informants.” In Linguistic Fieldwork, ed.
by Paul Newman and Martha Ratliff, 55–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gerdts, Donna B. 2017. “Indigenous Linguists: Bringing
Research into Language Revitalization.” International Journal of American
Linguistics 83(4): 607–617.
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2017. “Producing Language Reclamation
by Decolonising ‘Language’”. In Language Documentation and
Description, vol. 141, ed.
By Wesley Y. Leonard and Haley de Korne, 15–36. London: EL Publishing.
McGivney, Annette. 2021 (3 July). “The
Battle for Mount Rushmore: ‘It Should be Turned into Something Like the Holocaust Museum.’” The
Guardian. [URL]
Niditch, Susan. 1996. Oral
World and Written Word: Ancient Israelite
Literature. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
Pascual, Esther. 2014. Fictive
Interaction: The Conversation Frame in Thought, Language, and Discourse. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Riederer, Rachel. 2019. “An
Uncommon Victory for an Indigenous Tribe in the Amazon.” The New
Yorker, 15 May. [URL]
