Cover not available

Article published In: When Dialogue Fails
Edited by Anja Müller-Wood
[Language and Dialogue 12:1] 2022
► pp. 91–109

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

“Decorum will be strictly observed”

Generic tensions and failed dialogue in Martin Amis’s London Trilogy

 | Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Published online: 7 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00113.gil
Abstract
Martin Amis’s London Trilogy constitutes a body of work that has variously been categorised as comic, satirical, or simply postmodern. Given these assessments, the present essay concentrates on forms and functions of dialogue in these novels to identify its use as a generic marker. What emerges is that – while individual passages of dialogue are demonstratively structured along conventional generic lines – their function is to temporarily mislead the reader into trusting those ostensibly univocal signals, and thus contributing to their undermining by the remainder of the text. Fusing divergent generic aspects together into a form that is here termed anti-comedy, and consistently establishing and undermining readers’ expectations is one of the central functions of dialogue in Amis’s London Trilogy, the essay claims.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Martin Amis, form and failed dialogue
  • 2.Comedy: Divergent expectations
  • 3.Satire: Distribution of knowledge
  • 4.Postmodernism: Intertextual references
  • 5.Conclusion: Failed dialogue and the question of genre
  • Notes
  • References
References (17)
References
Amis, Martin. 2011 [1984]. Money: A Suicide Note. London: Vintage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003 [1989]. London Fields. London: Vintage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996 [1995]. The Information. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Begley, Jon. 2004. “Satirizing the Carnival of Postmodern Capitalism: The Transatlantic and Dialogic Structure of Martin Amis’s Money.” Contemporary Literature 45(1): 79–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bentley, Nick. 2015. Martin Amis. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dern, John A. 2000. Martians, Monsters and Madonna: Fiction and Form in the World of Martin Amis. New York: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diedrick, James. 1995. Understanding Martin Amis. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gill, Patrick and Florian Kläger. 2013. “‘You didn’t set me up. Did you?’: Genre, Authorship and Absence in Martin Amis’s London Fields and Night Train.” Trespassing: An Online Journal of Trespassing Art, Science, and Philosophy 21: 36–51. [URL]
Holman, Clarence Hugh. 1981. A Handbook to Literature, 4th edition. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopton, Marilyn and Christina Ruse. 1992. The Cassell Dictionary of Literary and Language Terms. London: Cassell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kincaid, James R. 1971. Dickens and the Rhetoric of Laughter. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kläger, Florian. 2009. “‘Negative Hilarity’: Anti-Comedy in The Information and Troilus and Cressida.” “My age is as a lusty winter”: Essays in Honour of Peter Erlebach and Thomas Michael Stein. Ed. Bernhard Reitz. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lodge, David. 1990. After Bakhtin: Essays on Fiction and Criticism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGrath, Patrick. 1987 (1 January). “Martin Amis by Patrick McGrath.” Bomb Magazine 181. [URL]
Pfister, Manfred. 1988. The Theory and Analysis of Drama. Trans. John Halliday. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaffer, Elinor S. 1968. “Iago’s Malignity Motivated: Coleridge’s Unpublished ‘Opus Magnum.’” Shakespeare Quarterly 19(3): 195–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tredell, Nicolas (ed.). 2000. The Fiction of Martin Amis: A Reader’s Guide to Essential Criticism. Cambridge: Icon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue