Cover not available

Article published In: When Dialogue Fails
Edited by Anja Müller-Wood
[Language and Dialogue 12:1] 2022
► pp. 54–71

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The collapse of dialogue, consent, and the controversy over Kristen Roupenian’s “Cat Person”

 | University of Hamburg
Published online: 7 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00111.rox
Abstract
This paper provides a Bakhtinian reading of Kristen Roupenian’s “Cat Person” in order to register the status of dialogue pertaining to questions of sexual coercion and consent in the wake of the #metoo movement. I identify two prominent discourses in the short story: feminist critiques of domination (perspectives that account for structural imbalances that tend to put men in a hierarchy above women) and sex-positive feminism (a worldview that promotes female sexual agency). These two discourses, this paper argues, are relevant to understanding why a collapse of dialogue ensues in the narrative. I then use “Cat Person” to propose a way of contemplating the contemporary media landscape as a generator of failed dialogue.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Politics, polarization, and the demise of dialogue
  • 3.Two discourses: Critiques of domination and sex-positive feminism
  • 4.“Cat Person” as failed dialogue on consent
  • 5.Aesthetic distance in the era of the filter bubble
  • Notes
  • References
References (28)
References
Ahmed, Sara. 2014. Willful Subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018 (20 May). “The Time of Complaint.” Feministkilljoys. [URL]
. 2021. Complaint! Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martin. 2018. Rape and Resistance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. Mikhail. 1981. “Discourse in the Novel.” In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. by Michael Holquist. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banet-Weiser, Sarah. 2018. Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beard, Mary. 2017. Women & Power: A Manifesto. London: Profile Books. eBook.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bozdag, Engin and Jeroen van den Hoven. 2015. “Breaking the Filter Bubble: Democracy and Design.” Ethics and Information Technology 171: 249–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 2018. Feminism. Ideas in Profile. London, Profile Books. eBook.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2016. Updating to Remain the Same: Habitual New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon-Smith, Matilda. 2017 (12 December). “Cat Person is Familiar to Women Who Feel Powerless to Stop a Sexual Encounter.” The Guardian. [URL]
Garber, Megan. 2017 (12 December). “‘Cat Person’ and the Impulse to Undermine Women’s Fiction.” The Atlantic. [URL]
Halley, Janet. 2016 (28 June). “The Move to Affirmative Consent.” Signs. [URL].
Kipnis, Laura. 2017. Unwanted Advances: Sexual Paranoia Comes to Campus. New York, Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. Feminism Unmodified. Discourses on Life and Law. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian. 1995. “The Autonomy of Affect.” Cultural Critique 311: 83–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Laura. 2017 (11 December). “The New Yorker’s ‘Cat Person’ Story is Great. Too Bad the Internet Turned It into a Piping-Hot Thinkpiece.” Slate. [URL]
O’Kane, Caitlin. 2018 (18 December). “Kentucky Radio Station plays ‘Baby, It’s Cold Outside’ on Repeat for Hours, Defying Critics who’ve Banned it.” CBS News. [URL]
Pham, Larissa. 2017 (15 December). “Our Reaction to ‘Cat Person’ Shows That We Are Failing as Readers.” Village Voice. [URL]
Rancière, Jacques. 2004. The Politics of Aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roupenian, Kristen. 2017 (11 December). “Cat Person.” New Yorker. [URL]
. 2019. “Cat Person.” In Cat Person and Other Stories. New York: Scout Press, 77–98.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roxburgh, Natalie. 2021. “Rethinking Disinterestedness through the Rise of Political Economy.” In Aesthetic Heteronomy: Beyond Autonomy in British and German Eighteenth-Century Tradition, ed. by Karl Axelsson, Camilla Flodin, and Mattias Pirholt, 277–97. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J. 1998. Unwanted Sex: The Culture of Intimidation and the Failure of Law. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tambe, Ashwini. 2018. “Reckoning with the Silences of #MeToo.” Feminist Studies 44(1): 197–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treisman, Deborah. 2017 (4 December). “Kristen Roupenian on the Self-Deceptions of Dating.” The New Yorker. [URL]
Walsh, Kelly S. and Terry Murphy. 2019. “Irresolute Endings and Rhetorical Poetics: Readers Respond to Roupenian’s ‘Cat Person.’” Style 53(1): 88–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue