Cover not available

Discussion published In: Language and Dialogue
Vol. 11:3 (2021) ► pp.457–486

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Discussion article

Dialogue

The complex whole

 | University of Münster, Germany
Published online: 5 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00106.wei
Abstract
The article unfolds dialogue as the complex whole of human action and behaviour in the theory of New Science. The actual state of research in dialogue analysis seems to be a garden of a thousand flowers where scholars can pick out the flower they like. Can this be science? New Science is introduced as science of complexity which represents a new hierarchy of integrated components derived from the complex whole. The structure of dialogue as the complex whole allows us to describe and explain all pertinent components in one theory. The article briefly outlines the main components: action and grammar. New Science also means the end of unjustified assumptions which underlie most of the various current models of science and philosophy and calls for verification by neuro- and sociobiology.
Article outline
  • 1.The ‘thing’ we want to find out
  • 2.From classical science to New Science
    • Starting point
    • The object
    • Goal
    • Methodology
    • The key to opening up the complex whole
    • The role of data
    • Why to proceed from the simple to the complex
  • 3.Human nature as structuring principle
  • 4.The complex whole of the action game
    • 4.1Fundamentals
    • 4.2Abandoning and redefining traditional concepts
  • 5.The basic structure of action
  • 6.Grammar in New Science
    • 6.1Fundamentals of an utterance grammar
    • 6.2Reference and predication as components
  • 7.The challenge of humanity: Uniting science and philosophy
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (65)
References
Adams, Jennifer L. 2017. “Self-interest and Social Concerns.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 294–306. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian and George Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Minimal Computation and the Architecture of Language.” Chinese Semiotic Studies 12 (1): 13–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engberg-Pederson, Elisabeth and Ditte Boeg Thomsen. 2016. “The Socio-Cognitive Foundation of Danish Perspective-Mixing Dialogue Particles.” In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu and Arie Verhagen, 125–142. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feynman, Richard P. 1998. The Meaning of It All. Thoughts of a Citizen-Scientist. Reading, GMass.: Perseus Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. The Pleasure of Finding Things out. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Written and Conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frawley, William. 1987. “Review Article: van Dijk (ed.) 1985. Handbook of Discourse Analysis 1-IV.” Language 631: 361–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1993. “Coherence in Text and in Mind.” Pragmatics and Cognition 11: 171–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 31: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva and Haiping Long. 2013. “An Outline of Discourse Grammar.” In Functional Approaches to Language, ed. by Shannon T. Bischoff and Carmen Jany, 155–206. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth. 2012. “The Syntax/Pragmatics Interface.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 529–548. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Shifting Concepts of Language. Meeting the Challenge of Modelling Interactive Syntax.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 197–213. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2007. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. A Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass./London: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lumsden, Charles J. and Edward O. Wilson. 2005. Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. New Jersey: World Scientific. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchand, Trevor H. J. 2010. “Making Knowledge: Explorations of the Indissoluble Relation between Minds, Bodies, and Environment.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 16 (s1): S1–S21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIntyre, Lee. 2019. The Scientific Attitude. Defending Science from Denial, Fraud, and Pseudoscience. Cambridge, Mass./London: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor A. and Leo Wanner. 1994. “Lexical Co-occurrence and Lexical Inheritance. Emotion Lexemes in German: A Lexicographic Case Study.” Lexikos 41: 88–160 (Afrilex-Reeks/Series 4). Stellenbosch/Republik Südafrika.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2nd rev. ed. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Okulska, Urszula. 2018. “The Ethics of Intercultural Dialogue: Reconciliation Discourse in John Paul II’s Pontifical Correspondence.” In Dialogic Ethics, ed. by Ronald C. Arnett and François Cooren, 77–126. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya. 1994. Les lois du chaos. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, Mass./London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1948. Human Knowledge. Its Scope and Limits. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1978. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 7–55. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: At the University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seligman, Martin E. P. 1970. “On the Generality of the Laws of Learning.” Psychological Review 771: 406–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1962. “The Architecture of Complexity: Hierarchic Systems.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1061: 467–482.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stati, Sorin. 1990. Le transphrastique. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. “Formal Devices for Argumentative Moves.” In Text und Grammatik. Festschrift für Roland Harweg zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. by Peter Canisius, Clemens-Peter Herbermann and Gerhard Tschauder, 52–61. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara Fox and Chase Wesley Raymond. 2021. “The Grammar of Proposals for Joint Activities.” Interactional Linguistics 1 (1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael and Henrike Moll. 2010. “The Gap is Social: Human Shared Intentionality and Culture.” In Mind the Gap. Tracing the Origins of Human Universals, ed. by Peter M. Kappeler and Joan B. Silk, 331–349. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. (ed.). 1985. Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vols 1–41. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. 1725. Scienza nuova. The First New Science. Leon Pompa (ed. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wandruszka, Mario. 1969. Sprachen vergleichbar und unvergleichlich. München: Piper.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 1991. “The Dialogic Principle Revisited: Speech Acts and Mental States.” In Dialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung, Bologna 1990, ed. by Sorin Stati, Edda Weigand and Franz Hundsnurscher, vol. 11, 75–104. Tübingen: Niemeyer. – Reprinted in Edda Weigand (ed. by Sebastian Feller). 2009. Language as Dialogue, 21–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. – Reprinted in Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey, 209–232. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. “Generalisierende Regel oder idiomatischer Gebrauch. Von den Schwierigkeiten eines Ausländers, Deutsch zu lernen.” In Festschrift für Prof. Dr. Karl Sornig zum 66. Geburtstag. Grazer Linguistische Monographien 111, 259–275.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “Review of Barbara A. Fox: Discourse and Anaphora.” Studies in Language 201: 236–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998a. “Contrastive Lexical Semantics.” In Contrastive Lexical Semantics, ed. by Edda Weigand, 25–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 1998b. Contrastive Lexical Semantics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Constitutive Features of Human Dialogic Interaction: Mirror Neurons and What They Tell Us about Human Abilities.” In Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language, ed. by Maxim Stamenov and Vittorio Gallese, 229–248. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Sprache als Dialog. Sprechakttaxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik. 2nd, rev. ed., Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “The Sociobiology of Language.” In Dialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand, 27–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009a. Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability (ed. by Sebastian Feller). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Lexical Units and Syntactic Structures: Words, Phrases and Utterances Considered from a Comparative Viewpoint.” In Weigand, Edda. Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability (ed. by Sebastian Feller), 113–128. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Dialogue in the Stream of Life.” Language and Dialogue 5(2): 197–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017a. “The Mixed Game Model. A Holistic Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 174–194. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. “The Concept of Language in an Utterance Grammar.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 214–233. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Dialogue: The Key to Pragmatics.” In From Pragmatics to Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand and Istvan Kecskes, 5–27. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “Language and Dialogue in Philosophy and Science.” Intercultural Pragmatics 18 (4): 533–561. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. forthcoming. “Thinking about the Future of the Humanities.” In Scholarly Organizations and the Study of Languages and Literatures, ed. by Tom Clark. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Weigand, Edda and Istvan Kecskes (eds). 2018. From Pragmatics to Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinberg, Steven. 2016. To Explain the World. The Discovery of Modern Science. UK: Penguin Random Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1972. Semantic Primitives. Frankfurt/M.: Athenaeum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. The Future of Life. London: Abacus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. The Meaning of Human Existence. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Gertrude E. Anscombe (trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Bondi, Marina & Judith Turnbull
2025. Dialogicity in framing environmental discourse. Language and Dialogue 15:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mishani-Uval, Yael
2025. Why we must communicate. Language and Dialogue 15:3 ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Ahmed Abdel-Raheem
2024. The pragmatics of denial and resistance: Some theoretical and methodological considerations. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28:3 ► pp. 491 ff. DOI logo
Druzhinin, Andrey S., Tom Scholte & Tatiana A. Fomina
2024. (Im)politeness mismatches in the multi-dialogic pragmatics of telecinematic satire. Language and Dialogue 14:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Haiash, O., S. Mykhalska, S. Myronova & O. Bielova
2024. Studying the level of dialogical speech development in pupils with intellectual disorders as an indicator of their mental health. CHILD`S HEALTH 19:2 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2024.  Experto crede . Language and Dialogue 14:2 ► pp. 268 ff. DOI logo
Tereszkiewicz, Anna
2024. Social identity construction in expert-lay dialogue on Facebook. Language and Dialogue 14:2 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Tereszkiewicz, Anna & Magdalena Szczyrbak
2024. Online health communication. Language and Dialogue 14:2 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Botaș, Adina
2023. A dialogic speech act approach to ridiculing references in the French presidential debate of 2022. Language and Dialogue 13:3 ► pp. 364 ff. DOI logo
Chłopicki, Władysław
2023. The drama of dialogue action in distinct discourse spaces. Language and Dialogue 13:3 ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Cooren, François
2023. Speech Acts and Ventriloquation: The Contribution of Marina Sbisà to a General Theory of Action and Performativity. In Sbisà on Speech as Action [Philosophers in Depth, ], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Weigand, Edda
2023. Principles of New Science. Language and Dialogue 13:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue