Cover not available

Article published In: Language and Dialogue
Vol. 10:3 (2020) ► pp.303–319

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

“You can’t say that”

The effects of group affiliation on moral condemnation in cases of group self-deprecation

 | The Hebrew University, Israel
Published online: 4 December 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00072.ots
Abstract
Why does our moral intuition tend to differ when a person uses deprecating speech towards her own affiliation group as opposed to an outer affiliation group? This paper offers a descriptive mapping of moral intuitions behind group self-deprecation (GSD) as stemming from two theoretical fields: pragmatics and standing. The first possible explanation to our moral intuition focuses on the moral flaw in the utterance of condemned (i.e., the person using GSD). Here, I argue our moral intuition suggests the group affiliation of the condemned affects the utterance’s pragmatic interpretation, thus affecting its offensiveness. An alternative explanation focuses on the critic. Here, I argue practices of standing lay behind the offhand rejection of critiques from outer-group members, regardless of their validity.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Explaining the first moral intuition: The condemned’s group identity affects the deprecating implicature
    • 2.1Black humor: The case of group self-deprecating humor
    • 2.2Phrase reclaiming: The Cases of Queer and Slut
  • 3.Explaining the second moral intuition: The critic’s group identity denies the critic standing
    • 3.1The non-hypocrisy condition: Group paternalism
    • 3.2The non-involvement condition: Enjoying the fruits of deprecation
    • 3.3The business condition: An outside group member is not affected by the group deprecation
    • 3.4Know thy place condition: Group autonomy
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (33)
References
Allport, Gordon. 1954. Nature of Prejudice. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Macalester. 2013. “The standing to blame: a critique.” In Blame: Its nature and norms, ed. by Justin D. Coates and Neal Tognazzini. 263–281. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braxton, Greg. 2015. Yes, ‘black-ish’ is tackling that word head-on. The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from [URL]; [URL]
Brommage, Thomas. 2015. “Just kidding, folks: an expressivist analysis of offensive humor.” Florida Philosophical Review 661: 71–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brontsema, Robin. 2004. “A queer revolution: Reconceptualizing the debate over linguistic reclamation.” Colorado Research in Linguistics 17(1): 9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, Justin D. and Neal Tognazzini. 2018. “Blame.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta. Retrieved from [URL]
Cohen, Gerald A. 2006. “Casting the first stone: Who can, and who can’t, condemn the terrorists?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 581: 113–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeSpelder, Lynne Ann and Albert Lee Strickland, A. 1996. The Last Dance: Encountering Death and Dying. California City, CA: Mayfield Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duff, Robin A. 2010. “Blame, moral stand and the legitimacy of the criminal trial.” Ratio 231: 123–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald. 2017. “Paternalism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta. Retrieved from [URL]
Freud, Sigmund. 2003. The Joke and Its Relation to the Unconscious. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 2013. “How to blame people responsibly.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 471: 271–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrick, Jacqueline and Mary Beth Williams. 2014. “The humor of trauma survivors: Its application in a therapeutic milieu.” In Trauma Treatment Techniques, ed. by Jacqueline Garrick and Mary Beth Williams. 1911. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret. 2006. “Who’s to blame? Collective moral responsibility and its implications for group members.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30(1): 94–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbert, Cassie. 2015. “Precarious projects: The performative structure of reclamation.” Language Sciences 521:131–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herstein, Ori J. 2017. “Understanding standing: Permission to deflect reasons.” Philosophical Studies 174(12): 3109–3132. Retrieved from Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Annie. 2016. “SlutWalk as perifeminist response to rape logic: The politics of reclaiming a name.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 13(1): 23–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hope, Clover. 2015. “The Black-ish ‘N Word’ Episode Turned Out Just Fine.” Jezebel. Retrieved from [URL]
King, Matt. (in press). “Skepticism about the standing to blame.” In Oxford Studies in Agency And Responsibility, vol. 61, ed. by David Shoemaker. 265–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kocieda, Aphrodite. 2014. “We’re taking slut back: Analyzing racialized gender politics in Chicago’s 2012 Slutwalk march” (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from [URL]
Levy, Ariel. 2006. Female Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture. NY: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1941. “Self-hatred among Jews.” Contemporary Jewish Record IV1: 219–232.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, Carol. 1977. “The sexual perspective in the appreciation and interpretation of jokes.” Western Folklore 71 (3/4): 293–309.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1998. “Concealment and exposure.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 271: 3–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rieger, Alicja. 2015. “It was a joke for him and a life for me: A discourse on disability related humor among families of children with disabilities.” Disability Studies Quarterly 41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sabini, John and Maury Silver. 1982. Moralities of everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas M. 2008. Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana Valentine. 2000. “Paternalism, unconscionability doctrine, and accommodation.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 29(3): 205–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Aangela M. 2007. “On being responsible and holding responsible.” The Journal of Ethics 21: 465–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Todd, Patrick. 2019. “A unified account of the moral standing to blame.” Noûs 53(2): 347–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaillant, George. 1994. “Ego mechanisms of defense and personality psychopathology.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 103(1): 44–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay. 2010. “Hypocrisy, moral address, and the equal standing of persons.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 381: 307–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zolten, Jerome. 1988. “Joking in the face of tragedy.” ETC: A Review of General Semantics 45(4): 345–350.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue