Cover not available

Article published In: Dialogue and Ways of Relating
Edited by Huey-Rong Chen
[Language and Dialogue 10:1] 2020
► pp. 49–73

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Is dialogue addictive?

Of loops, pride, and tensions in social media communication

 | Université du Québec à Trois Rivières, Canada
Published online: 19 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00059.kat
Abstract
In this study, we shed some light on the thinking behind Facebook addiction. Since social network system are dialogical communication tools, we carve out a space for a theoretical and methodological alternative to the research on social media addiction, as it relates specifically to Facebook addiction. Based on several meta-evaluations and synthesis of extant empirical research, we uncover the two most prominent functionalist approaches sustaining these empirical researches. Upon pointing to their epistemological, theoretical and methodological limitations, we delve into dialogic approach and theory with a view to isolate how and what it is in a dialogic communication that makes it addictive. Finally, we offer some theoretical and methodological alternatives from a dialogical perspective on how to study Facebook addiction.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Facebook addiction: A functionalist approach
    • 2.1The social skill model of problematic internet usage (PIU)
    • 2.2The uses and gratification model
  • 3.Limitations of a functionalist approach to Facebook addiction
    • 3.1The dialogical approach
      • 3.1.1What is dialogue?
      • 3.1.2The epistemological model of dialogue
      • 3.1.3The aesthetic model of dialogue
      • 3.1.4The model of open dialogue
  • 4.Dialogue, love and addiction in Facebook
    • 4.1Facebook and epistemological model of dialogue
    • 4.2The five steps of addiction in the digital dialogue
    • 4.3Aesthetic dialogue and Facebook addiction
  • 5.Suggestions for a dialogical approach to Facebook addiction
  • 6.Conclusion: Dialogue and Facebook addiction
  • References
References (59)
References
Arnett, Ronald C. 2004. “A dialogic ethic ‘between’ Buber and Levinas.” In Dialogue. Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, ed. by Rob Anderson, Leslie A. Baxter, Kenneth N. Cissna, 75-90. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. “Situating a dialogic ethics: A dialogic confession.” In The Handbook of Communication Ethics, ed. by George Cheney, Steve May and Debashish Munshi. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aknin, Lara B., Elizabeth W. Dunn, and Michael I. Norton. 2012. “Happiness runs in a circular motion: a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness.” Journal of Happiness Studies 131: 347–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. Bakhtin. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. Esthétique de la création verbale. Paris: Ed. Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1970. Problèmes de la poétique de Dostoiévski. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory and Jurgen Ruesch. 1988. Communication et Société. Paris: Édition du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baxter, Leslie A. 2004. “Dialogues of relating.” In Dialogue. Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, ed. by Rob Anderson, Leslie A. Baxter, Kenneth N. Cissna, 107-124. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory and Jurgen, Ruesch. 1958/1988. Communication et société. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1977. Vers une écologie de l’esprit 11. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1980. Vers une écologie de l’esprit 21. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory, Don D. Jackson, and Jay Haley. 1963. “A note on the double bind-1962.” Family Process 21:154–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baxter, Leslie A. and Dan H. DeGooyer, Jr. 2001. “Perceived aesthetic characteristics of interpersonal conversations.” Southern Communication Journal 671: 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beavin Bavelas, Janet H. 1992. “Research into the pragmatics of human communication.” Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies 11(2): 15–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benbunan-Fich, Raquel. 2001. “Using protocol analysis to evaluate the usability of a commercial website.” Information and Management 391: 151–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohm, David. 1996. On Dialogue, ed. by Lee Nichol. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buber, Martin. 1965. The Knowledge of Man: A Philosophy of the Interhuman, ed. by M. Friedman. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butterfield, Lee D., William A. Borgen, Norman E. Amundson, and Asa-Sophia T. Maglio. 2005. “Fifty years of critical technical incident: 1954–2004 and beyond.” Qualitative Research. Flight 5 (4): 475–497. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caplan, Scott E. 2007. “Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic internet use.” CyberPsychology and Behavior 10(2): 234–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. “Theory and measurement of generalized problematic internet use: A two-step approach.” Computer in Human Behavior 261: 1089–1097. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cash, H., C. D. Rae, A. H. Steel, and A. Winkler. 2012. “Internet addiction: A brief summary of research and practice.” Current Psychiatry Reviews 8(4): 292–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Hsuan-Ting and Kim Yonghwan. 2013. “Problematic use of social network sites: The interactive relationship between gratifications sought and privacy concerns.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16(11): 806–812. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chou, Chien, Jung Chou, and Nay-Ching Nancy Tyan. 1998. “An exploratory study of internet addiction, usage and communication pleasure – the Taiwan’s case.” International Journal Education Telecommunication 5(1): 47–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chou, Chien, Linda Condron, and John C. Belland. 2005. “A review of the research on internet addiction.” Educational Psychology Review 17(4): 363–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B. 2009. Influence: Science and Practice. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresci, Elena. 2016. “Lonelygirl15: How the mysterious vlogger changed internet.” The Guardian, Thu., June 16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. Anders and Herbert A. Simon. 1984. Protocol Analysis: Using Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fonteyn, Martha E., Benjamin Kuipers, and Susan J. Grobe. 1993. “A description of think aloud method and protocol.” Qualitative Health Research 3(4): 430–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J. 1999. Le constructionisme social. Lonay, Suisse: Delachaux and Niestlé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gergen, Keneth J., Mary M. Gergen, and Frank J. Barrett. 2004. “Dialogue: Life and death of the organization.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse, ed. by David Grant, Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick, and Linda L. Putnam, 39–59. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guadagno, Rosanna E., Nicole L. Muscanell, Lindsay M. Rice, and Nicole Roberts. 2013. “Social influence online: The impact of social validation and likability on compliance.” Psychology of Popular Media Culture 2(1): 51–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawes, Leonard C. 2004. “Double binds as structures in dominance and of feelings.” In Dialogue. Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, ed. by Rob Anderson, Leslie A. Baxter and Kenneth N. Cissna, 175–190. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pub. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahane, Adam. 2010. Power and Love: A Theory and Practice of Social Change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Pub.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, Timothy, Karen L. Asshcraft, and François Cooren. 2018. “What work can organizational communication do?” Management Communication Quarterly 33(1): 1–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuss, Daria J., Mark D. Griffiths, and Jens F. Binder. 2013. “Internet addiction in students: Prevalence and risk factors.” Computers in Human Behavior 291: 959–966. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politiques de la nature. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1971. Totalité et infinité. Paris: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983/2011. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macït, Hüseyin Bilal, Gamze Macït, and Orhan Güngör. 2018. “A research on social media addiction and dopamine driven feedback.” Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Science 5(3): 882–897.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markova, Ivana. 2003. Dialogicality and Social Representations. The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pandey, Erica. 2017. “Sean Parker: Facebook was designed to exploit human ‘vulnerability’.” Retrieved from [URL]
Pearce, W. Barnett and Kimberly A. Pearce. 2004. “Taking a communication perspective on dialogue.” In Dialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, ed. by Rob Anderson, Leslie A. Baxter and Kenneth N. Cissna, 39–56. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popescu, Adam. 2018. “Keep your head up: How smartphones addiction kills manners and moods.” The New York Times, Jan 25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryan, Tracii, Andrea Chester, John Reece, and Sophia Xenos. 2014. “The uses and abuses of Facebook: A review of Facebook addiction.” Journal of Behavioral Addictions 3(3): 133–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seikkula, Jakko. 2005. “Dialogical analysis of theme sequences in open dialogues for psychotic crises: comparing good and poor outcome cases.” In Focus on Psychotherapy Research, ed. by M. E. Abelian, 103-119. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seikkula, Jaakko and David Trimble. 2005. “Healing elements of therapeutic conversation: Dialogue as embodiment of love.” Family Process 44(4):461–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seikkula, Jaakko, Jukka Aaltonen, Birgitta Alakare, Kaauko Haarakangas, Jyrki Keränen, and M. Sutela. 1995. “Treating psychosis by means of Open Dialogue.” In The Reflecting Team in Action: Collaborative Practice in Family Therapy, ed. by Steven Friedman, 62–80. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stephenson, William Y. 1988. The Play Theory of Mass Communication, 2nd ed. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsoukas, Hardimos. 2009. “A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations.” Organization Science 20(6): 941–957. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Janet Helmick Beavin, and Don D. Jackson. 1972. Une logique de la communication. Paris: Édition du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2017. “The mixed game model. A holistic theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 174–194. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Dialogue. The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wellman, Barry. 1996. “For a social network analysis of computer networks: A sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual connectivity.” Proceedings of SIGCP SIGMIS, 1-11. Denver: ACM Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, William J. 2008. “The interlocutor dilemma: the place of strategy in the dialogic theory.” Communication Theory 18(1): 5–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitting, Anita and David Williams. 2013. “Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4): 362-369.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whiting, Anita, David Williams. 2013. “Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach.” Qualitative Market Research 16(4): 362–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woolsey, Lorette K. 1986. “The critical technical incident: An innovative qualitative method of research.” Canadian Journal of Counseling 20 (4): 242–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolf, Montrose M. 1978. “Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how is it applied?” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 111: 203–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, Julia Carrie. 2017. “Former Facebook executive: social media is ripping society apart.” Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Demir, Mahmut & Yusuf Günaydın
2023. A digital job application reference: how do social media posts affect the recruitment process?. Employee Relations: The International Journal 45:2 ► pp. 457 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Xinyan & Yi-Ru Regina Chen
2022. How brand-stakeholder dialogue drives brand-hosted community engagement on social media: A mixed-methods approach. Computers in Human Behavior 131 ► pp. 107208 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue