Cover not available

Article published In: Language and Dialogue
Vol. 9:2 (2019) ► pp.217–235

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Dialogical strategies in replies to offensive humour

 | University of Macerata (Italy)
 | University of Lleida (Spain)
Published online: 12 July 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00039.can
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to determine whether humour can be used as a discursive strategy to reply to offensive humour about natural disasters and what purpose it serves. A corpus of 431 replies to the Charlie Hebdo cartoons concerning the earthquake in central Italy in August 2016 was analysed. Depending on the target of the humour in these replies, they were used to agree, disagree or deflect away from the offensive and aggressive content of the cartoons. The results show that humour can be used as a discursive strategy to respond to offensive humour. Moreover, an analysis of the corpus revealed that humorous replies were used mainly to agree rather than disagree with the cartoons.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Offence and ridicule
    • 2.1Humour as a two-sided pragmatic event
    • 2.2Humorous reactions
    • 2.3Identifying the targets
  • 3.The Charlie Hebdo cartoons on the earthquake and the reactions to them
    • 3.1Humorous or not humorous?
  • 4.Data and methods
    • 4.1Setting the corpus
    • 4.2Tagging the corpus
    • 4.3Analysis of the tagged data
  • 5.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
References (60)
References
Apter, Michael J. (ed.). 2001. Motivational Styles in Everyday Life: A Guide to Reversal Theory. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. “Towards a Theory of Things: Reversal Theory and Design.” Journal of Motivation, Emotion, and Personality 2(2): 3–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “The Semantic Foundations of Cognitive Theories of Humor.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research 10(4): 395–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Humor and Irony in Interaction. From Mode Adoption to Failure of Detection.” In Say not to Say: New Perspectives on Misscommunication, ed. by Luigi Anolli, Rita Ciceri, and Giuseppe Riva, 159–179). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, Christian F. Hempelmann, and Sara Di Maio. 2002. “Script oppositions and Logical Mechanisms: Modeling Incongruities and their Resolutions.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research 15(1): 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2017. “The General Theories of Verbal Humor.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 126–142. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore and Victor Raskin. 1991. “Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research 4(3/4): 293–347.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beermann, Ursula. 2014. “Sick Humor.” In Encyclopedia of Humor Studies, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 691–693. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Nancy D. 2014. “Reactions to Humor, non-laughter.” In Encyclopedia of Humor Studies, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 628–629. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, Ivana, Carla Canestrari, Anna Maria Roncoroni, Roberto Burro, Erika Branchini, and Ugo Savardi. 2017. “The Effects of Modulating Contrast in Verbal Irony as a Cue for Giftedness.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 30(4), 383–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule: Toward a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bongelli, Ramona, Carla Canestrari, Ilaria Riccioni, Andrzej Zuczkowski, Cinzia Buldorini, Ricardo Pietrobon, Alberto Lavelli, and Bernardo Magnini. 2012. “A Corpus of Scientific Biomedical Texts Spanning over 168 years annotated for Uncertainty.” In Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation LREC 2012, ed. by Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Mehmet Uğur Doğan, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, A. Moreno, Jan Odijk, and Stelios Piperidis, 2009–2014. Istanbul: European Language Resources Association – ELRA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowes, Andrea and Albert N. Katz. 2011. “When Sarcasm stings.” Discourse Processes 481, 215–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, Christian and Margot van Mulken. 2017. “Humor Markers.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 385–399. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canestrari, Carla. 2010. “Meta-communicative Signals and Humorous Verbal Interchanges: A Case Study.” Humor-International Journal of Humor Research 23(3), 327–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “A Model of Humor Syntony: From Failed to Successful Humor in Interaction.” In Humor and Health Promotion, ed. by Paola Gremigni, 59–77. New York: Nova Sciences. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canestrari, Carla, Alberto Dionigi, and Andrzej Zuczkowski. 2014. “Humor Understanding and Knowledge.” Language and Dialogue 41, 261–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canestrari, Carla, Erika Branchini, Ivana Bianchi, Ugo Savardi, and Roberto Burro. 2018. “Pleasures of the Mind: What Makes Jokes and Insight Problems Enjoyable.” Frontiers in Psychology 81, 2297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandler, Marilyn R. 1988. “Healthy Irreverence: Humor in Stories of Illness.” Humor-International Journal of Humor Research 1(3), 299–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Catherine E. 2003. “How English-learners Joke with Native Speakers: An Interactional Sociolinguistic Perspective on Humor as Collaborative Discourse across Cultures.” Journal of Pragmatics 351, 1361–1385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Christie. 2011. Jokes and Targets. Bloomington, Indiana USA: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dionigi, Alberto and Carla Canestrari. 2016. “Clowning in Health Care Settings: The Point of View of Adults.” Europe’s Journal of Psychology 12(3), 473–488. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018a. “The Role of Laughter in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: Case Studies.” Discourse Studies 20(3), 323–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. “The Use of Humour by Therapists and Clients in Cognitive Therapy.” European Journal of Humour Research 6(3), 50–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2011. “Joker in the Pack. Towards Determining the Status of Humorous Framing in Conversations.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, ed. by Marta Dynel, 217–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “When Does Irony Tickles the Hearer? Towards Capturing the Characteristics of Humorous Irony.” In Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, ed. by Marta Dynel, 289–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisterhold, Jodi, Salvatore Attardo, and Diana Boxer. 2006. “Reactions to Irony in Discourse: Evidence for the Least Disruption Principle.” Journal of Pragmatics 38(8), 1239–1256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forabosco, Giovannatonio, Guglielmo Gulotta, and Maria Letizia Musu. 2001. Il Comportamento Spiritoso. Milan: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forabosco, Giovannatonio and Elisabetta Paratico. 1984. “Humor e Indici Meta Comunicazionali.” Psicologia e Società 21, 17–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 2000. “Irony in Talk among Friends.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 151, 5–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guimelli, Christian, Grégory Lo Monaco, and Jean-Claude Deschamps. 2010. “The Lawsuit against Charlie Hebdo and Its Effects on the Social Representation of the Muslim Community.” Revue Internationale de Psychologie Social 41, 5–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 1994. “Jocular Abuse Patterns in Mixed-group Interaction.” Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 61, 26–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hempelmann, Christian F. 2014. “Reception of Humor.” In Encyclopedia of Humor Studies, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 629–630. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janicki, Karol. 2015. Language and Conflict. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiper, Nicholas A. 2014. “Health Benefits of Humor, Psychological.” In Encyclopedia of Humor Studies, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 281–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuipers, Giselinde. 2006. Good Humor, Bad Taste. A Sociology of the Jokes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Good Humor, Bad Taste. A Sociology of the Jokes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kupfer Snider, Andrea. 1994. “Effective Responses to Offensive Comments.” Negotiation Journal 10(2), 107–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landis, Richard J. and Gary G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 331, 159–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGhee, Paul E. 1972. “On the Cognitive Origins of Incongruity Humor: Fantasy Assimilation versus Reality Assimilation.” In The Psychology of Humour, ed. by Jeffrey H. Goldstein and Paul E. McGhee, 61–80. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGraw, Peter A., Caleb Warren, Lawrence E. Williams, and Bridget Leonard. 2012. “Too Close for Comfort, or Too Far to Care? Finding Humor in Distant Tragedies and Close Mishaps.” Psychological Science 23(10), 1215–1223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGraw, Peter A., Lawrence E. Williams, and Caleb Warren. 2013. “The Rise and Fall of Humor. Psychological Distance Modulates Humorous Responses to Tragedy.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 5(5), 566–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morreall, John. 1983. Taking Laughter Seriously. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Applications of Humor: Health, the Workplace, and Education.” In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. by Victor Raskin, 449–478. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulkay, Michael. 1988. On Humour. Its Nature and Its Place in Modern Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pexman, Penny M., Lenka Zdrazilova, Devon McConnachie, D., Kirby Deater-Deckard, and Stephen A. Petrill. 2009. “‘That Was Smooth, Mom’: Children’s Production of Verbal and Gestural Irony.” Metaphor and Symbol 241, 237–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht and Boston, MA: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, Vera M. 1991. Humor and the Health Professions: the Therapeutic Use of Humor in Health Care. New Jersey: Slack.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruch, Willibald. 1992. “Assessment of Appreciation of Humor: Studies with the 3 WD Humor Test.” In Advances in Personality Assessment (Vol. 9), ed. by Charles Donald Spielberger, and James Neal Butcher, 27–72. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruch, Willibald, Salvatore Attardo, and Victor Raskin. 1993. “Toward an Empirical Verification of the General Theory of Verbal Humor.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research 61, 123–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruch, Willibald and Sigrid Rath. 1993. “The Nature of Humor Appreciation: Toward an Integration of Perception of Stimulus Properties and Affective Experience.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research 6(4), 363–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryan, Cynthia A. 1997. “Reclaiming the Body: The Subversive Possibilities of Breast Cancer Humor.” Humor. International Journal of Humor Research 10(2), 187–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsakona, Villy. 2009. “Language and Image Interaction in Cartoons: Towards a Multimodal Theory of Humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 411, 1171–1188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viana, Amadeu. 2017. “Dualities in Humour. Incongruity Meets Ridicule.” Israeli Journal of Humor Research 6(1), 7–38. [URL]
Watts, Richard J. 1989. “Comic Strips and Theories of Communication.” Word & Image 5(2), 173–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whalen, Juanita M. and Penny M. Pexman. 2010. “How Do Children Respond to Verbal Irony in Face-to-face Communication? The Development of Mode Adoption across Middle Childhood.” Discourse Processes 471, 363–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Humor Support and Mode Adoption.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 371–384. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziv, Avner. 1984. Personality and Sense of Humor. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Haugh, Michael & Rosina Márquez Reiter
2025. (Un)intended offence. Pragmatics & Cognition 32:1 ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Exploring the Sociopragmatics of Online Humor [Topics in Humor Research, 12], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue