Cover not available

Article published In: Language and Dialogue
Vol. 8:3 (2018) ► pp.341–362

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Dialogic features and interpersonal management in the early courtroom action game

The case of the opening statement

 | Hanyang University Seoul (South Korea)
Published online: 2 November 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00021.cha
Abstract
There are certain areas where present-day studies of language use can learn from history. Using a dialogue-analytic approach, this study investigates dialogic features and interpersonal management in the early English courtroom. Drawing upon a corpus of 81 opening statements from the Proceedings of the Old Bailey (1759–1799), the quantitative and qualitative analysis reveals that this courtroom action game is highly dialogic and that an active jury was significantly presupposed in this particular historical setting. The lawyers consistently endeavored to solicit solidarity and in-groupness through pronominal choices, and to argumentatively negotiate agreement and secure consent through directives, shared knowledge markers, asides, and questions. The findings testify to the central role of dialogism and interpersonal negotiation in historical courtroom action games.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Historical courtroom and opening statements
  • 3.Dialogic features and interpersonal management
  • 4.Method
  • 5.Findings
    • 5.1Building solidarity and fostering in-groupness
      • 5.1.1Second-person pronouns
      • 5.1.2Inclusive first-person plural pronouns
    • 5.2Negotiating meaning and securing consent
      • 5.2.1Appeals to shared knowledge
      • 5.2.2Asides
      • 5.2.3Directives
      • 5.2.4Questions
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (53)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2013. “Analyzing Modal Adverbs as Modal Particles and Discourse Markers.” In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, ed. by Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie, and Paola Pietrandrea, 89–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alschuler, Albert. 2005. “Narrative and Normativity: Comments on the Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial.” Journal of Legal History 261: 91–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “The Historical Courtroom: A Diachronic Investigation of English Courtroom Practice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson, 185–198. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Historical Pragmatics: Evidence form the Old Bailey.” Transactions of the Philological Society 1121: 259–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beattie, John. 1986. Crime and the Courts in England 1660–1800. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bogoch, Bryna. 1999. “Courtroom Discourse and the Gendered Construction of Professional Identity.” Law and Social Inquiry 241: 329–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles and Richard Bauman. 1992. “Genre, Intertextuality, and Social Power.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21: 131–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cairns, David. 1998. Advocacy and the Making of the Adversarial Criminal Trial 1800–1865. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald and Michael McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide to Spoken and Written Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cavalieri, Silvia. 2011. “The Role of Metadiscourse in Counsels’ Questions.” In Exploring Courtroom Discourse: The Language of Power and Control, ed. by Anne Wagner and Le Cheng, 79–110. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cecconi, Elisabetta. 2012. The Language of Defendants in the 17th Century English Courtroom: A Sociopragmatic Analysis of the Prisoners’ Interactional Role and Representation. Berlin: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2012. “Performing Self in the Witness Stand: Stance and Relational Work in Expert Witness Testimony.” Discourse & Society 231: 456–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, Yanrong. 2004. “Courtroom Questioning as a Culturally Situated Persuasive Genre of Talk.” Discourse & Society 151: 705–722. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda. 1980. “Language in the Legal Process.” Law and Society Review 151: 445–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haydock, Roger and John Sonsteng. 1991. Trial: Theories, Tactics, Techniques. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Tim and Robert Shoemaker. 2007. “The Value of the Proceedings as a Historical Source. Old Bailey Proceedings Online.” [URL] (accessed 5 Nov 2017)
Hobbs, Pamela. 2003. “‘Is That What We’re Here about?’: A Lawyer’s Use of Impression Management in a Closing Argument at Trial.” Discourse & Society 141: 273–290.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “‘It’s Not What You Say but How You Say It’: The Role of Personality and Identity in Trial Success.” Critical Discourse Studies 51: 231–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hostettler, John. 2006. Fighting for Justice: The History and Origins of Adversary Trial. Hook: Waterside Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huber, Magnus. 2007. “The Old Bailey Proceedings (1674–1834): Evaluating and Annotating a Corpus of 18th and 19th Century Spoken English.” [URL]
Hyland, Ken. 2001. “Bringing in the Reader: Address Features in Academic Articles. Written Communication 181: 549–574. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 71: 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 1994. ‘What Else can I Tell you’: A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato and Adrienne Lehrer. 1990. “Impersonal Uses of Personal Pronouns.” Journal of Pragmatics 141: 739–759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landsman, Stephen. 1990. “The Rise of the Contentious Spirit: Adversary Procedure in Eighteenth Century England.” Cornell Law Review 501: 498–609.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langbein, John. 1999. “The Prosecutorial Origins of Defence Counsel in the Eighteenth Century: The Appearance of Solicitors.” Cambridge Law Journal 581: 314–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. The Origins of the Adversary Criminal Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ma, Yue. 2008. “Exploring the Origins of Public Prosecution.” International Criminal Justice Review 181: 190–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and Peter White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory. 2001. Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauet, Thomas. 2013. Trial Techniques and Trials, 9th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
May, Allyson. 2003. The Bar and the Old Bailey 1750–1850. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pascual, Esther. 2006. “Fictive Interaction within the Sentence: A Communicative Type of Fictivity in Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics 171: 245–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastir. 1994. “The Politics of Pronouns.” ELT Journal 481: 173–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosulek, Laura. 2015. Dueling Discourses: The Construction of Reality in Closing Arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversations, vol. 1 and 21. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1976. “The Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 51: 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Robert. 2008. “The Old Bailey Proceedings and the Representation of Crime and Criminal Justice in Eighteenth-Century London.” Journal of British Studies 471: 559–580. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth. 2011. “Constructing the Audiences of the Old Bailey Trials 1674–1834.” In Communicating Early English Manuscripts, ed. by Paivi Pahta and Andreas Jucker, 69–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2000. “The Dialogic Action Game.” In Dialogue Analysis VII: Working with Dialogue, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill, and Fraces Rock, 1–18. Tubingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Conflict Resolution in Court.” Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction. Special issue of Studies in Communication Sciences 193–202.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Language as Dialogue.” Intercultural Pragmatics 71: 505–515. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Dialogue: The Key to Pragmatics.” In From Pragmatics to Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand and Istvan Kecskes, 5–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zupnik, Yael-Janette. 1994. “A Pragmatic Analysis of the Use of Person Deixis in Political Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 211: 339–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

李, 静
2023. A Review of Foreign Courtroom Discourse Studies. Modern Linguistics 11:05 ► pp. 2311 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue