Article published In: Language, Culture and Society
Vol. 6:2 (2024) ► pp.190–222
It’s your fault
A critical discourse analysis of narratives surrounding gender-based violence in a Russian talk show
Published online: 17 February 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.24028.kam
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.24028.kam
Abstract
While the problem still remains decriminalised in Russia, this study explores domestic violence victims’ storytelling in four episodes of the popular Russian talk show Pust’ Govoryat, which aired from 2017 to 2020. By drawing upon De Fina, A. (2021). Doing narrative analysis from a narratives as practices perspective. Narrative Inquiry, 31 (1), 49–71. narratives-as-practice approach and van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CDA theory, I critically examine storytelling as a discourse practice itself and situate constructed identities, norms, and values in wider dominant discourses of country’s social and political life. Corpus-assisted discourse analysis (Baker, P. (2012). Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(3), 247–256. ) helps to analyse the representation of abusers and victims. Qualitative and quantitative analyses suggest that the show, broadcast on the main state-funded federal channel, propagates a family ideology that supports victim-blaming, normalises and depolitisises domestic violence. The research indicates that such an anti-feminist, misogynist, and patriarchal discourse becomes an integral part of the state’s anti-Western and anti-liberal ideology and resonates with the general increase in epistemological violence in today’s Russia.
Article outline
- 1.Gender-based violence in Russia
- 2.Media representations of the gender-based violence
- 3.Data: Pust’ Govoriat talk show
- 4.Theoretical and methodological framework
- 5.Results: Analysis of victims’ narratives
- 5.1It is your fault: Don’t justify yourself with a glass of wine
- 5.2Quantitative analysis: Gender-based violence in PG show
- 5.2.1Violence representation in PG corpus
- 5.2.2Representation of abusers
- 5.2.3Representation of victims
- 6.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (60)
Antonova, Y. A. (2016). Nasilie v otnoshneii zhenschiin v Roissikoi Federatsii. Pravovoi analiz situatsii [Violence against Women in Russia. Legal Analysis of the Situation]. SJI Foundation website. Retrieved September 10, 2021 from [URL]
Baker, P. (2012). Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(3), 247–256.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, A. M., Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse and Society, 19(3), 273–306.
Baker, P., and McEnery, T. (2015). Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cameron, D. (2024). Language, sexism and misogyny. Cambridge University Press. (Chapter 7: Telling stories: How the media report violence against women).
Clark, K. (1998). The linguistics of blame: Representations of women in The Sun’s reporting of crimes of sexual violence. In D. Cameron (Ed.), The feminist critique of language: A reader (pp. 183–197). Routledge.
Constituting and responding to domestic and sexual violence. (2019). Special issue of Gender and Language, 13(4).
Dannie po auditorii SMI (2020). Media Scope Ratings. Retrieved September 2021 from [URL]
Davidenko, M., Belykh, A., and Poretskova, A. (2024). Media coverage of intimate partner violence incidents in Russia amid the conservative turn. Europe-Asia Studies, 76(2), 198–221.
De Fina, A. (2021). Doing narrative analysis from a narratives as practices perspective. Narrative Inquiry, 31 (1), 49–71.
(2023). Narratives and storytelling processes in the analysis of political discourse. In P. Cap (Ed.), Handbook of Political Discourse (pp. 204–218). Elgar Online.
First Channel website (2015). Pervyi kanal dvadtsat’ let v efire. Retrieved September 2021 from [URL]
Flood, M., and Pease, B. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 10(2), 125–142.
Flowerdew, J., & Richardson, J. E. (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies (1st ed.). Routledge.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). On MSN with buff boys: self and other identity claims in the context of small stories. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 151, 597–626.
Holoshitz, T., & Cameron, D. (2014). The linguistic representation of sexual violence in conflict settings. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(1), 1–23.
Jewkes, R. (2002). Intimate partner violence: Causes and prevention. The Lancet, 359(9315), 1423–1429.
Johnson, J. E. (2009). Gender violence in Russia the politics of feminist intervention. Indiana University Press.
Kazun, A. P., Karpushkina, A. A., Kurikhina, D. V., and Savunova, M. S. (2022). “If he beats you, it means he loves you”? Strategies for deproblematizing domestic violence in the Russian media. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 51, 149–171.
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images — The Grammar of Visual Design. Routledge, London.
Krizisnii tsentr Anna vkliuchili v reestr inostrannih agentov (2016, December 28). Wonderzine. Retrieved August 2021 from [URL]
Kto i pochemu vistupaet protiv. (2019, December 8). Ria Novosti. Retrieved August 2021 from [URL]
Livingstone, S. and Lunt, P. (1994). Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public debate. London, UK: Routledge.
Lobbisty antirossiiskogo Zakona o domashnem nasilii ispugalis’ roditel’skogo vozmushcheniia [Lobbyists of the Anti-Russian Law Got Scared of the Parents’ Indignation]. (2020, November 2). Russkoe Agenstvo Novostei. Retrieved 2020, November 6 from [URL]
Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2013). Personalising crime and crime-fighting in factual television: an analysis of social actors and transitivity in language and images. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), 356–372.
MVD: ezhegodno okolo 14 000 zhenshchin pogibaet ot ruk mizhei. (2008, January 24). Federal’noe informatsionnoe agenstvo Regnum. Retrieved September from 2021 [URL]
My protiv priniatiia zakona o profilaktike domashnego nasiliia. (2019, October 15). [Otkrytoe pis’mo presidentu Rossii V.V.Putinu]. Federal’noe informatsionnoe agenstvo Regnum. Retrieved August 2021 from [URL]
Nelaeva, G., Andreeva, A., & Drozhashchikh, N. (2020). Media Responses to Domestic Violence: Discussing Volodina v. Russia and the Domestic Violence Law. Problems of Post-Communism, 1–14.
Oates, S. (2009). The neo-Soviet model for the media. In B. Beumers, S. Hutchings & N. Rulyova (Eds.), Globalisation, Freedom and the Media after Communism. The Past as Future (pp. 37–55). London and New York: Routledge
Oskolkova, N. (2019, July 23). Ia ne hotela umirat’: o fleshmobe iz pervih ust. Flacon Mazagine. Retrieved August 2021 from [URL]
Padrnosová, J. (2022). Representation of sexual crimes against women in media. [Bachelor’s thesis, Masaryk University]. Masaryk University Repository.
Pisklakova-Parker, M. & Efanova, O. (2021). The Influence of Gender Stereotypes on the Growth of Gender Inequality and Domestic Violence in Russia in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 22(11), 31–41.
Pochemu vsia Rossiia vozmushchena zakonom Pushkinoi o semeinom nasilii? (2019, December 16). Informatsionnoe agenstvo Krasnaia vesna. [URL]
Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly. (2013, December 13). Retrieved from [URL]
Putin signs off on harsher ‘Foreign Agent’ law (2022, July 14). Radio Free Europe. Retrieved from [URL]
RPTS ne podderzhala zakonoproekt o domashnem nasilii (2019, December 4). TASS. Retrieved 2020, March 22 from [URL]
Ryazanova-Clarke, L. (2019). Russian linguistic culture in the age of globalization: A turn to linguistic violence. In V. Strukov & S. Hudspith (Eds.), Russian Culture in the Age of Globalization (1st ed., pp. 264–290). Routledge.
Semukhina, O. (2020). The Decriminalization of Domestic Violence in Russia. Demokratizatsiya 28 (1), 15–45.
Smith, J. M. (2012). Murder, gender and the media: Narratives of dangerous love. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sobolev, S., Parfent’eva, I., & Burmistrova, S. (2021). SOGAZ poluchil byvshii paket Abramovicha v ‘Pervom kanale’. RBC News Portal. Retrieved September 2021 from [URL]
Thornborrow, J. (2015). The discourse of public participation media from talk show to Twitter, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Tolson, A. (2006). Media Talk: Spoken Discourse on TV and Radio. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Tolz, V., and Hutchings, S. (2015). Nation, Ethnicity and Race on Russian Television, London: Taylor and Francis.
Tranchese, A. (2023). From Fritzl to #MeToo: Twelve years of rape coverage in the British press. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tsentr Nasiliiu.net priznali inostrannym agentom (2020). Novaia Gazeta. Retrieved August 2021 from [URL]
UN Women. (2020, April 6). The shadow pandemic: Violence against women during COVID-19. Retrieved from [URL]
van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 352–371). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Word Sketch (2022). Word Sketch [Computer Software]. Retrieved April 10, 2022 from [URL]
Zakonoproekt O domashnem nasilii — Rezul’tat inostrannogo vmeshatel’stva vo vnutrennie dela Rossii [The Draft Law On Domestic Violence Is the Result of Foreign Interference in Russia’s Internal Affairs]. (2019, November 10). Russkoe Agenstvo Novostei. Retrieved April 22, 2020 from [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
