Article published In: Chronotopes and the COVID-19 Pandemic
Edited by Anna De Fina and Sabina M. Perrino
[Language, Culture and Society 4:2] 2022
► pp. 189–217
Chronotopic resolution, embodied subjectivity, and collective learning
A sociolinguistic theory of survival
Published online: 25 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.22005.kar
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.22005.kar
Abstract
In our contribution to this special issue on “Chronotopes & the COVID-19 Pandemic”, we discuss the
complexities of human survival and its dependence on collective learning. We argue that
collective learning – and thus survival – is a sociolinguistic phenomenon and lay out a fractal system in which the related
sociolinguistic processes play out. This system highlights the chronotopic-scalar situatedness of survival and captures the
material, textual, and imagined aspects of learning and meaning-making. Drawing on interactions among a small group of Iranian
migrants dealing with the effects of COVID-19, we discuss the processes through which participants dynamically construct and
update their chronotopic images of their new circumstances, as they interact with material and semiotic data coming from multiple
scales/centers. We show how the normative-semiotic indeterminacies caused by COVID-19 are navigated by social actors as they make
sense of their spatiotemporal surroundings in pursuit of material and ideological survival.
Keywords: COVID-19, chronotopes, collective learning, survival, scales, fractality
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Sociolinguistics and the complexities of survival
- 2.1Conceptualizing survival within a fractal system
- 2.2Text, context, and the chronotope
- 2.3Rechronotopization: From the material to the social and back
- 2.4Collective learning within a system of images and resolutions
- 3.Navigating the indeterminacies of embodied experiences of COVID-19
- 4.Discussion and conclusion
- Acknowledgement
References cited
References (70)
Al-Alawi, W. (2022). English at the center of the periphery: ‘Chicken nuggets’, chronotopes, and scaling English in Bahraini youth. Language in Society. [to appear]
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Baker, D. (2016). Collective Learning: a potential unifying theme of human history. Journal of World History, 26(1), 77–104.
Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. L. (1990). Poetics and Performances as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19(1): 59–88.
(2015). Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology 441, 105–116.
(2018). Durkheim and the Internet: Sociolinguistics and the sociological imagination. London: Bloomsbury.
(2019). Constructing and Consolidating Chronotopes. Discussant’s comments, panel on Mobility, marginality and meaning: A chronotopic approach, convenors Lydia Catedral and Farzad Karimzad. IPrA Conference, Hong Kong. [URL]
(2020). Commentary: Chronotopes, synchronization and formats, Language & Communication, 701, 132–135.
Blommaert, J., & De Fina, A. (2017). Chronotopic identities: On the timespace organization of who we are. In Anna De Fina and Jeremy Wegner (eds.) Diversity and super-diversity, 1–14. Georgetown University Press.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach, Discourse studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.
Canagarajah, S. (2018). Translingual practice as spatial repertoires: Expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 31–54.
Carr, E. S., & Lempert, M. (2016). Introduction: Pragmatics of scale. In E. S. Carr & M. Lempert (Eds.), Scale: Discourse and dimensions of social life. Oakland: University of California Press, pp.1–21.
Catedral, L. (2021). The (im)possibility of sociolinguistic hybridity: Power and scaling in post-soviet, transnational life. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 25(3), 324–349.
Christian, D. (2011). Maps of time: An introduction to big history (Vol. 21). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
De Fina, A., & Perrino, S. (2020). Introduction: Chronotopes and chronotopic relations, Language & Communication, 701, 67–70.
Dick, H. P. (2010). Imagined lives and modernist chronotopes in Mexican nonmigrant discourse. American Ethnologist, 371, 275–290.
Divita, D. (2014). From Paris to Pueblo and Back:(Re-) Emigration and the Modernist Chronotope in Cultural Performance. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 24(1), 1–18.
(2019). Recalling the bidonvilles of Paris: Historicity and authority among transnational migrants in later life. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 29(1), 50–68.
Djuraeva, M., & Catedral, L. (2020). Habitus and imagined ideals: Attending to (un) consciousness in discourses of (non) nativeness. International Multilingual Research Journal, 14(3), 270–285.
Gal, S. (2016). Scale-making: Comparison and perspective as ideological projects. In E. Sumerson Carr and M. Lempert (eds): Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life. University of California Press, pp. 91–111.
Gal, S., & Irvine, J. T. (2019). Signs of difference: Language and ideology in social life. Cambridge University Press.
Garavan, T. N., & Carbery, R. (2012). Collective learning. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 646–649.
Gayon, J. (1998). Darwinism’s struggle for survival: heredity and the hypothesis of natural selection. Cambridge University Press.
Hall, K. (2014). Hypersubjectivity: Language, anxiety, and indexical dissonance in globalization. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 24(2), 261–273.
Irvine, J., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. Kroskrity (ed.): Regimes of Language: Ideologies, polities and identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp. 35–83.
Jacquemet, M. (2005). Transidiomatic practices: Language and power in the age of globalization. Language & Communication, 25(3), 257–277.
Jørgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Karimzad, F. (2016). Life here beyond now: Chronotopes of the ideal life among Iranian transnationals. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(5), 607–630.
(2020). Metapragmatics of normalcy: Mobility, context, and language choice. Language & Communication, 701, 107–118.
(2021). Multilingualism, chronotopes, and resolutions: Toward an analysis of the total sociolinguistic fact. Applied Linguistics, 42(5), 848–877.
Karimzad, F., & Catedral, L. (2018a). Mobile (dis) connection: New technology and rechronotopized images of the homeland. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 28(3), 293–312.
(2018b). ‘No, we don’t mix languages’: Ideological power and the chronotopic organization of ethnolinguistic identities. Language in Society, 47(1), 89–113.
(2022). Navigating Topics and Creating Research Questions in Linguistic Anthropology. In S. Perrino & S. Pritzker (eds.), Research Methods in Linguistic Anthropology, 13–47, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Koven, M. (2013). Antiracist, modern selves and racist, unmodern others: Chronotopes of modernity in Luso-descendants’ race talk. Language & Communication, 33(4), 544–558.
Lyons, K., & Karimzad, F. (2019). Chronotopeography: Nostalgia and modernity in the South Delhi LL, Sociolinguistic Studies, 13(1), 83–104.
Lyons, A., & Tagg, C. (2019). The discursive construction of mobile chronotopes in mobile-phone messaging. Language in Society, 48(5), 657–683.
Mitić, V. V., Lazović, G. M., Manojlović, J. Ž., Huang, W. C., Stojiljković, M. M., Facht, H., & Vlahović, B. (2020). Entropy and fractal nature. Thermal science, 24(3 Part B), 2203–2212.
Park, J. S. Y. (2017). Transnationalism as interdiscursivity: Korean managers of multinational corporations talking about mobility. Language in Society, 46(1), 23–38.
Perrino, S. (2007). Cross-chronotope alignment in Senegalese oral narrative. Language & Communication, 27(3), 227–244.
Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical Writings of Peirce, Justus Buchler (ed.). New York: Dover Publications.
Pritzker, S. E. (2020). Language, emotion, and the politics of vulnerability. Annual Review of Anthropology, 491, 241–256.
Pritzker, S., & Perrino, S. (2020). Culture inside: Scale, intimacy, and chronotopic stance in situated narratives. Language in Society, 1–23.
Procházka, O. (2018). A chronotopic approach to identity performance in a Facebook meme page. Discourse, Context & Media, 251, 78–87.
Rosa, J. (2016). Racializing language, regimenting Latinas/os: Chronotope, social tense, and American raciolinguistic futures. Language & Communication, 461, 106–117.
Sanei, T. (2021). Normativity, power, and agency: On the chronotopic organization of orthographic conventions on social media. Language in Society, 1–28.
Silverstein, M. (1992). The indeterminacy of contextualization: When is enough enough?. In P. Auer and A. Di Luzio (eds.): The contextualization of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 55–76.
(1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Lucy, J. (ed.) Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–58.
(2005). Axes of evals: Token vs. type interdiscursivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 151: 6–22.
Silverstein, M., & G. Urban, eds. (1996). Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Snook, E., Blomain, E. S., Aing, A. S., Merlino, D., & Waldman, S. A. (2016). Guanylyl Cyclase Receptors. In Ralph A. Bradshaw, Philip D. Stahl (eds.), Encyclopedia of Cell Biology. Academic Press, pp. 56–60.
Wang, P. H. (2022). ‘The words has been immigrate’: Chronotopes in context-shaping narrative co-construction about Taiwanese loanwords with Taiwanese Americans. Language in Society, 51(1), 73–94.
Wirtz, K. (2016). The living, the dead, and the immanent: Dialogue across chronotopes. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 343–369.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Cao, Fan
Catedral, Lydia
De Fina, Anna
Liang, Yuyan & Lydia Catedral
Chao, Xia & Hao Wang
Guinto, Nicanor L.
Moqadam, Mahbubeh
Moqadam, Mahbubeh
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
