Article published In: Language, Epistemology, and the Politics of Knowledge Production
Edited by Alfonso Del Percio, Patricia Baquedano-López, Miguel Pérez-Milans and Cécile B. Vigouroux
[Language, Culture and Society 3:2] 2021
► pp. 201–230
Special issue articles
Imperial straightening devices in disciplinary choices of academic knowledge production
Published online: 5 November 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.21001.cus
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.21001.cus
Abstract
In this piece, the authors question whether critical language research, in its complex collection of researcher
choices, is possible beyond the discursive imaginary of critical academic scholarship. In other words, how do (allegedly)
anticolonial efforts re-orient towards contribution to the imperial record? We present three vignettes, through which we grapple
with the notion that researcher choice exists within the solipsism of academia. In doing so, we frame research and scholarship as
a collection of choices, which we believe are better understood as a collection of fraught dilemmas. These dilemmas recognize that
all academic scholarship production and its processes are birthed from, and serve, an epistemology of hierarchical social
configurations, which serve empire maintenance and expansion. As critical language scholars who bring overlapping and distinct
sociopolitical, geographic, and methodological positionalities, these autoethnographic narrative vignettes allow us to begin to
see the landscape of researcher choice in the processes and projects of accumulating knowledge production. We identify imperial
straightening devices for legitimization into the imperial archive and examine how they work to orient and re-orient critical
language scholars towards the ideological and material production of the imperial archive.
Article outline
- 1.Straightening devices and the imperial archive
- 1.1Imperial archive
- 1.2Straightening devices
- 2.Autoethnographic narrative vignettes
- 3.Autoethnographic narrative vignettes of researcher choices
- 3.1Mel: Academic “training” in (mis)recognition and knowledge production
- Straightening devices
- Memory narrative
- Critical analysis
- 3.2Nicole: Viability for tenure and promotion in engaging in critical reflexivity
- Straightening devices
- Memory narrative
- Critical analysis
- 3.3Hanna: Chasing after novelty and disciplinary criticality in choosing a theoretical framework
- Straightening devices
- Memory narrative
- Critical analysis
- 3.1Mel: Academic “training” in (mis)recognition and knowledge production
- 4.Dis-orienting from imperial straightening devices and myths of choice
- 5.On time, being on time, and being in time
- Acknowledgements
References
References (56)
Accomplices not allies: Abolishing the ally industrial
complex. On nonprofit-certified “white allies” and privilege
theory. (2015). Revolutionary solidarity: A critical reader for
accomplices (pp. 35–43). [zine].
n.p.
Ahmed, S. (2006). Orientations:
Toward a queer phenomenology. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay
Studies, 12(4), 543–574.
Burns, K. (2010). Into
the archive: Writing and power in colonial
Peru. Duke: Duke University Press.
Castro-Gómez, S. (2007). The
missing chapter of empire: Postmodern reorganization of coloniality and post-Fordist
capitalism. Cultural
Studies, 21(2–3), 428–448.
Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F., & Hernandez, K. A. C. (2016). Collaborative
autoethnography. London: Routledge.
Cushing-Leubner, J. (2020a). Discourse
and whiteness. In Z. Casey. (Ed.), Encyclopedia
of critical whiteness studies in
education (pp. 133–143). Boston: Brill Sense.
(2020b). Heritage
language education: A holistic view. In S. Laviosa & M. González Davies. (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of translation and
education (pp. 303–321). London: Routledge.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A
thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Bloomsbury (UK): Bloomsbury Publishing.
Garbisch, A. J. (2021). Constructing
identity by writing roots into life: A poetic-narrative autoethnography. Journal of Poetry
Therapy, 34(1), 37–47.
Gopinath, G. (2018). Unruly
visions: The aesthetic practices of queer
diaspora. Durham: Duke University Press.
Gordon, A. F. (2008). Ghostly
matters: Haunting and the sociological
imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gramsci, A. (1999). Selections
from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (Q. Hoare and G. Nowell Smith. trans.). London: The Electric Book Company, Ltd.
Hanauer, D. I. (2012). Growing
up in the unseen shadow of the Kindertransport. Qualitative
Inquiry, 18(10), 845–851.
Heller, M., & McElhinny, B. (2017). Language,
capitalism, colonialism: Toward a critical
history. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Lin, A. (2015). Preface:
Can a spider weave its way out of the web that it is being woven into, just as it
weaves? In H. Zhang, P. W. K. Chan, & K. Kenway. (Eds.), Asia
as method in education studies: A defiant research
imagination (xxi–xv). London: Routledge.
Linkon, S., & Mullen, B. (1995). Gender,
race, and place: Teaching working-class students in Youngstown. The Radical
Teacher, 461, 27–32.
Lorente, B. P. (2019). Dismantling
the colonial structure of knowledge production. Language, Culture and
Society, 1(1), 152–156.
Lowe, L. (2007). The
worldliness of intimacy. In D. Ganguly, & N. Curthoys. Edward
Said: The legacy of a public
intellectual (pp. 121–151). Academic Monographs.
McElhinny, B. (2019). Acknowledging. Language, Culture and Society, 1(1), 132–140.
Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic
disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture &
Society, 26(7–8), 159–181.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological
research: Analyses and examples. Phenomenological Research
Methods, 120–154.
Mungwini, P., Creller, A., Monahan, M. J., & Murdock, E. G. (2019). Why
epistemic decolonization? Journal of World
Philosophies, 4(2), 70–105.
Myers, K. (2014, November). The
intimacy of three settler nations: Colonialism, race, and child welfare. Gazillion
Voices.
Nagar, R. (2014). Muddying
the waters: Coauthoring feminisms across scholarship and
activism. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
O’brien, J. M. (2010). Firsting
and lasting: Writing Indians out of existence in New
England. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Pieratos, N. A., Manning, S. S., & Tilsen, N. (2021). Land
back: A meta narrative to help indigenous people show up as movement
leaders. Leadership, 17(1), 47–61.
Rådesjö, M. (2018). Learning
and growing from ‘communities of practice’: Autoethnographic narrative vignettes of an aspiring educational researcher’s
experience. Reflective
Practice, 19(1), 68–80.
Rambukwella, H. (2019). On
hybridity, the politics of knowledge production and critical language studies. Language,
Culture and
Society, 1(1), 126–131.
Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2012). Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: A reflection on the practices and discourses of decolonization. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(1), 95–109.
(2019). Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: A reflection on the practices and discourses of decolonization. Language, Culture and Society, 1(1), 106–119.
Rosiek, J. L., Snyder, J., & Pratt, S. L. (2020). The
new materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial
engagement. Qualitative
Inquiry, 26(3–4), 331–346.
Russell, M. (2019). Capitalism
and disability: Selected writings by Marta
Russell. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
Saldaña, J. (2021). Gay-Tex-Mex:
Autoethnographic Vignettes. Cultural Studies↔ Critical
Methodologies, 21(2), 143–145.
Siefert, B., Salas, S., & D’Amico, M. M. (2018). Problematizing
deficit representations of in-service teachers. TESOL
Journal, 9(2), 397–400.
Simpson, A. (2007). On
ethnographic refusal: Indigeneity, “voice,” and colonial
citizenship. Junctures, 91, 67–80.
Simpson, L. B. (2017). As
we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical
resistance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Smith, L. T. (2015). Decolonizing
knowledge: Toward a critical indigenous research justice praxis. Research Justice:
Methodologies for Social Change, 205–210.
Stoler, A. L. (2002). Colonial
archives and the arts of governance. Archival
Science, 2(1–2), 87–109.
TallBear, K. (2017). Beyond
the life/not-life binary: A feminist-indigenous reading of cryopreservation, interspecies thinking, and the new
materialisms. In J. Radin & E. Kowal. (Eds.), Cryopolitics:
Frozen life in a melting
world (pp. 179–202). Boston: MIT Press.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). R-words:
Refusing research. In D. Paris & M. Winn. (Eds.), Humanizing
research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and
communities (pp. 223–247). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
(Eds.). (2018). Toward
what justice?: Describing diverse dreams of justice in
education. London: Routledge.
Verene, D. P. (1991). The
new art of autobiography: An essay on the life of Giambattista Vico, written by
himself. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Virtanen, T., Silander, C. & Pietilä, M. (2014). National
steering and profiling of academic research in Finland and
Sweden. In T. Aarrevaara & E. Berg. (Eds.), Higher
education and research in academe: Who should
pay? (pp. 29–40). Luleå tekniska universitet.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Karpava, Sviatlana
Bagga-Gupta, Sangeeta
Gibson, Andrew G. & Taina Saarinen
Weuffen, Sara & Aleryk Fricker
2024. The politics of positionality and naming practices in socio-cultural relations. Language, Culture and Society 6:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Engman, Mel, Johanna Ennser-Kananen & Taina Saarinen
Lozenski, Brian D. & Anita P. Chikkatur
M. Engman, Mel, Johanna Ennser-Kananen & Jenna Cushing-Leubner
Amundsen, Diana
Benswait, Ahmad Jaber & Miguel Pérez-Milans
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
