Cover not available

Article published In: Manufacturing Knowledge
Edited by Alfonso Del Percio and Cécile B. Vigouroux
[Language, Culture and Society 5:2] 2023
► pp. 182–198

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The copycat paradigm

Italian “Class‑A” journals and the paradoxes of excellence

 | University of Bologna Alma Mater Studiorum
Published online: 29 January 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00041.don
Abstract
This article describes how the copycat implementation of foreign protocols of assessment is transforming the production of knowledge within the Italian social sciences. Focusing on the gatekeeping process whereby the national agency for the evaluation of university research (ANVUR) publishes yearly lists of “Class‑A” journals, my analysis draws on interviews, first-hand observations, my own experience as a returning migrant-scholar, as well as comparisons with historical Italian journals. My aim is twofold: on the one hand, I reflect on the parallel misrecognition of scale and context underlying neoliberal capitalism; on the other hand, I describe the paradoxes of excellence and the forms of reflexive alienation engendered by the contemporary knowledge economy.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Migrating protocols of quality assurance
  • 3.Class‑A journals and the paradoxes of excellence
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
ANVUR. 2011. Valutazione della Qualità della ricerca 2004–2010. URL [URL] (accessed 08.21.2023).
Baldwin, M. (2019). Peer Review. In C. Phillips (Ed.) Encyclopedia of the History of Science. Open-access encyclopedia hosted by Carnegie Mellon University. Available online at [URL]
Banfi, A. (2014). Impatto nocivo. La valutazione quantitativa della ricerca ei possibili rimedi. Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico, 21, 361–384.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Besley, A. C., & Peters, M. A. (2006). Neoliberalism, performance and the assessment of research quality. South African Journal of Higher Education, 20(6), 814–832.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonaccorsi, A. (2020). Two decades of research assessment in Italy. Addressing the criticisms. Scholarly Assessment Reports, 21, 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bortolotto, F., Fuochi, E., Paone, D. A., & Parodi, F. (2018). Sistema periodico: Il secolo interminabile delle riviste. Bologna: Pendragon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brenneis, D., Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2005). Getting the measure of academia: Universities and the politics of accountability. Anthropology in Action, 12(1), 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capano, G. (2010). A Sisyphean task: Evaluation and institutional accountability in Italian higher education. Higher Education Policy, 231, 39–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Criteri VRA22 Area 11a. (2022). Commissione per la Valutazione della Ricerca Sessione 2022.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giancola, O., & Colarusso, S. (2020). Università e nuove forme di valutazione. Strategie individuali, produzione scientifica, effetti istituzionali. Roma: Sapienza Università Editrice.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dei, F. (2023). Le riviste di antropologia culturale in Italia: Problemi e prospettive. Dialoghi Mediterranei, 611, 1–9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Eramo, M. (2001). The pig and the skyscraper: Chicago: A history of our future. New York: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fassari, L. G., & Valentini, E. (Eds.) (2020). I sociologi e la valutazione dell’università. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, A. V. (1991). Total quality control. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freschi, A. C., & Santoro, M. (2010) “Symposium: Thinking Academic Evaluation after Michèle Lamont’s How Professors Think. Introduction.” Sociologica 31: 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fumagalli, A. (2017). Governance della ricerca e sussunzione dell’apprendimento. In General intellect (Eds.), Università critica. Liberi di pensare, liberi di ricercare (pp. 51–59). Effimera-Il Lavoro Culturale.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geuna, A., & Piolatto, M. (2015). Research assessment in the UK and Italy: Costly and difficult, but probably worth it (at least for a while). Research Policy, 451, 260–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gershon, I. (2011). Neoliberal agency. Current anthropology, 52(4), 537–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giglioli, P. (1979). Baroni e burocrati. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gotesky, B. (1970). The pursuit of excellence. Educational Theory, 20(4), 406–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kockelman, P. (2006). A semiotic ontology of the commodity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 16(1), 76–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2012). I guasti del referaggio anonimo. Il Mulino 61(2), 289–295.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morano Foadi, S. (2006). Key issues and causes of the Italian brain drain. Innovation 19(2), 209–223.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moss, D. (2012). When patronage meets meritocracy: Or, the Italian academic concorso as cockfight. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 53(2), 205–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 3–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palumbo, B. (2018). Lo strabismo della DEA. Antropologia, accademia e società in Italia. Palermo: Museo Pasqualino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pardo-Guerra, J. P. (2022). The quantified scholar: How research evaluations transformed the British social sciences. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, J. S.-Y., & Bucholtz, M. (2009). Introduction. Public Transcripts: Entextualization and linguistic representation in institutional contexts. Text & Talk, 29(5), 485–502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinto, V. (2019). Valutare e punire. Una critica alla cultura della valutazione. Napoli: Cronopio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. (1993). Managerialism and the public service. The Anglo-American experience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poole, B. (2010). Quality, semantics and the two cultures. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(1), 6–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2013). The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face. Research Policy, 42(9), 1657–1666. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In K. H. Basso & H. A. Selby (Eds.), Meaning in anthropology (pp.11–53). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., & Urban, G. (1996). Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1999). Audit culture and anthropology: Neo-liberalism in British higher education. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 557–575. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spier, R. E. (2002). The history of peer review. Trends in biotechnology, 20(8), 357–358. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (ed.) (2000). Audit cultures. Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsing, A. (2013). Sorting out commodities: How capitalist value is made through gifts. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(1), 21–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urciuoli, B. (2003). Excellence, leadership, skills, diversity: Marketing liberal arts education. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 385–408. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Donzelli, Aurora
2025. Translations Interrupted: Italian Neorural Revivals and the Neodialect Poetics of Nonscalability. Signs and Society 13:3 ► pp. 326 ff. DOI logo
Donzelli, Aurora
2025. The Translation Machine: Exploring the Infrastructures of Valorization under Semiocapitalism. Signs and Society 13:3 ► pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Vigouroux, Cécile B. & Alfonso Del Percio
2024. Reading or writing is not the question: politicizing the politics of scholarly production and reception [Language, Culture and Society]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2024:289-290 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue