Article published In: Language, Culture and Society
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp.8–30
Lost in the hall of mirrors
The linguistics of Aryan as a knowledge domain in colonial and postcolonial India
Published online: 12 April 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00002.hut
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00002.hut
Abstract
The category Aryan and the paradigm of ideas associated with it remains highly controversial in contemporary India, and the history, status, and impact of this concept are contested at many levels. This paper starts with the assumption that the genesis of this concept lies in Western linguistic theorizing, and analyzes in outline the reception and impact of Aryan Invasion Theory and the postulation of an Aryan-Dravidian divide. Radical Hindu nationalists reject all aspects of the colonial scholarship of India; other Indian scholars see Western scholarship as authoritative to the extent that it falls within the framework of secular modernity. The argument made here is that the entire Aryan paradigm rests on a faulty set of academic presumptions and that its impact has been more long lasting and destructive than even the application of race theory to the understanding of India. In this sense the paper accepts the criticisms made by radical Hindu nationalists of colonial linguistics, and this raises further complex issues about knowledge production and application, scholarly expertise and authority.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Hindu revivalist nationalism
- 3.The Aryan paradigm
- 4.The contemporary debate and Aryan invasion theory
- 5.Outsider linguists versus insider understandings
- 6.Concluding thoughts: A personal view
- Notes
References
References (97)
Banerjee, S. C. (2016). Brahmo Samaj as an actor in the dissemination of Aryan invasion theory (AIT) in India. International Journal of Asian Studies, 131, 19–59.
Baugh, J. (2000). Beyond Ebonics: Linguistic pride and racial prejudice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Basu, T., Datta, P., Sarkar, S., Sarkar, T., & Sen, S. (1993). Khaki shorts saffron flags. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.
Bernal, M. (1987). Black athena: Afroasiatic roots of classical civilization: The fabrication of ancient Greece, 1785–1985. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Bhutia, L. (2016). An ideological tussle develops over references to India and Hinduism in American textbooks. Open Magazine, May 20, 2016. Available at: [URL]
Campbell, L. (2007). Why Sir William Jones got it all wrong, or Jones’ role in how to establish language families. In J. Lakarra and J. Hualde (Eds.), Studies in Basque and Historical Linguistics in Memory of R. L. Trask (pp. 245–64). Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.
Chakrabarti, D. (2009). India: An archeological history. (2nd ed). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Chamberlain, J. (Ed.) (1991). The Ram Khamhaeng controversy: Collected papers. Bangkok: Siam Society.
Clarke, J. J. (2002). Oriental Enlightenment: The encounter between Asian and Western thought. London: Routledge.
Cohn, B. (1996). Colonialism and its forms of knowledge: The British in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Colebrooke, H. T. (1873). On the Sankrit and Prákrit languages. In E. B. Cowell (Ed.), Miscellaneous Essays: A New Edition with Notes, vol. 21 (pp. 1–32) London: Trübner. First published, Asiatic Researches, 71: 199–231, 1801.
Cowan, R. (2010). The Indo-German identification: Reconciling South Asian origins and European destinies 1765–1885. Rochester, NY: Camden House.
Deshpande, M. (2006). Aryan origins: brief history of linguistic arguments. In R. Thapar (Ed.), India: Historical beginnings and the concept of the Aryan (pp. 98–156). New Delhi: National Book Trust.
Dirks, N. (2001). Castes of mind: Colonialism and the making of modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Figueira, D. (2002). Aryans, Jews, Brahmins: Theorizing authority through myths of identity. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Fosse, L. (2005). Aryan past and post-colonial present: the polemics and politics of indigenous Aryanism. In E. F. Bryant & L. Patton (Eds.), The Indo-Aryan controversy: Evidence and inference in Indian history (pp. 434–467). Abingdon: Routledge.
Friese, K. (2001). Liver is not mutton. In Civil Lines: New writing from India, Vol. 41 (pp. 7–34). New Delhi: Permanent Black.
Gellner, E. (2006). Nations and nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. First published, 1983.
Havell, E. (1918). The history of Aryan rule in India: From the earliest times to the death of Akbar. London: Harrap.
Heller, M., & McElhinny, B. (2017). Language, capitalism, colonialism: Towards a critical history. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press.
Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, R. (Eds.) (2012). The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutton, C. (2005). Race and the Third Reich: Linguistics, racial anthropology and genetics in the dialectic of Volk. Cambridge: Polity.
(2013). Fictions of affinity and the Aryan paradigm. In M. Messling & O. Ette (Eds.), Wort-Macht-Stamm: Rassismus und determinismus in der philologie (pp. 89–103). Munich: Fink.
(2017). Phonocentrism and the concept of Volk: The case of modern China. In A. Morris-Reich & D. Rupnow (Eds.), Ideas of “race” in the history of the humanities (pp. 273–296). London: Palgrave.
Ilaiah, K. (1996). Why I am not a Hindu: A Sudra Critique of Hindutva philosophy, culture and political economy. Calcutta: Samya.
Jones, Sir William. (1799). On the Hindus. The third anniversary discourse, Delivered 2 February, 1786. The works of Sir William Jones (Vol. 11, pp. 19–34). London: G.G. and J. Robinson.
Kaiwar, V. (2003). The Aryan model of history. In V. Kaiwar & S. Mazumdar (Eds.), Antinomies of Modernity: Essays on race, Orient, nation (pp. 13–61). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Kelly, L. (2016). California’s Hindu textbook controversy: Redefining Hindu American identity. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Toulouse. Available at: [URL]
Leopold, J. (1974). The Aryan theory of race in India 1870–1920: Nationalism and internationalist versions. The Indian Economic and Social History Review 71, 271–297.
Malhotra, R. (2014). Indra’s net: Defending Hinduism’s philosophical unity. New Delhi: HarperCollins.
Malhotra, R., & Neelakandan, A. (2011). Breaking India; Western interventions in Dravidian and Dalit faultlines. New Delhi: Amaryllis.
McGetchin, D. (2009). Indology, Indomania, and Orientalism: Ancient India’s rebirth in modern Germany. Madison, WI: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Messling, M. (2016). Gebeugter Geist. Rassenlogik und Erkenntnis in der modernen europäischen Philologie. Göttingen: Wallstein.
Misra, S. S. (2005). The data of the Rigveda and the Aryan migrations: Fresh linguistic evidence. In E. Bryan & L. Patton (Eds.), The Indo-Aryan Controversy; Evidence and inference in Indian History (pp. 181–233). London: Routledge.
Momin, S. (2017). When the last dome fell: A first-person account of the Babri Masjid demolition. The Hindu, December 6, 2017. Available at: [URL]
Morris, R. (Ed.) (2010). Can the subaltern speak? Reflections on the history of an idea. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Müller, F. M. (1860). A history of Ancient Sanskrit literature, so far as it illustrates the primitive religion of the Brahmans (2nd ed.). London: Williams and Norgate.
Nanda, M. (2000). Postmodernism and religious fundamentalism: A scientific rebuttal to Hindu science. New Delhi: Navayana.
(2004). Prophets facing backward: Postmodern critiques of science and the Hindu nationalism in India. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
(2016). Science in Saffron: Skeptical essays on history of science. New Delhi: Three Essays Collective.
Pereltsvaig, A., & Lewis, M. (2015). The Indo-European controversy: Facts and fallacies in historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2014). Wendy Doniger’s book is a tribute to Hinduism’s complexity, not an insult. The Guardian on-line, Feburary 12, 2014, available at: [URL]
Ramaswamy, K., Nicolas, A. de, & Banerjee, A. (Eds.) (2007). Invading the sacred: An Analysis of Hinduism studies in America. New Delhi: Rupa.
Ramaswamy, S. (2004). The lost land of Lemuria: Fabulous geographies, catastrophic histories. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ramirez, D., Wiley, T., Klerk, G. de, Lee, E. and Wright, W. (Eds.) (2005). Ebonics: The urban education debate. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Rocher, R., & Rocher, L. (2012). The making of Western Indology: Henry Thomas Colebrooke and the East India Company. London: Routledge.
Saraswati, S. V. (1996). Āryāvart (The Original habitat of Aryans). New Delhi: Vijaykumar Govindram Hasanand.
Schlegel, F. (1819). Über J. G. Rhode: Über den Anfang unserer Geschichte. Wiener Jahrbücher der Literatur 81, 413–468.
Seth, S. (2009). Putting knowledge in its place: Science, colonialism, and the postcolonial. Postcolonial Studies 121, 373–388.
Shankar, Shalini. (2008). Desi land: Teen culture, class, and success in Silicon Valley. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Steadman-Jones, R. (2007). Colonialism and grammatical representation: John Gilchrist and the analysis of the “Hindustani” language in the late Eighteenth and Nineteenth centuries. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tavakoli-Targhi, M. (2003). Orientalism’s genesis amnesia. In Sucheta Mazumdar (Ed.), Antinomies of modernity: Essays on race, Orient, nation (pp. 98–124). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Thapar, R. (1989). Imagined religious communities? Ancient history and the modern search for a Hindu identity. Modern Asian Studies 231, 209–231.
(2001). Syndicated Hinduism. In G.-D. Sontheimer & H. Kulke (Eds.), Hinduism Reconsidered (pp 54–81). New Delhi: Manohar.
[ToI] (2010). Supreme Court lifts ban on James Laine’s book on Shivaji. The Times of India, July 9, 2010. Available at: [URL]
Toref-Ashkenazi, C. (2009). Der romantische mythos vom Ursprung der Deutschen. Friedrich Schlegels Suche nach der indogermanischen Verbindung. Göttingen: Wallstein.
(2006). Languages and nations: The Dravidian proof in colonial Madras. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Vickery, M. (1991a). The Ram Khamhaeng inscription, a Piltdown skull of Southeast Asian history? In J. Chamberlain (Ed.), The Ram Khamhaeng controversy (pp. 3–52). Bangkok: The Siam Society.
(1991b). Piltdown Skull – Installment 2. In J. Chamberlain (Ed.), The Ram Khamhaeng controversy (pp. 333–418). Bangkok: The Siam Society.
Warren, W. (1885). Paradise found: Cradle of the human race at the North Pole. Boston, MA: Haughton Mifflin.
Willson, A. L. (1964). A mythical image: The ideal of India in German romanticism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Witzel, M. (2005). Indocentricism: Autochtonous visions of ancient India. In E. F. Bryant & L. L. Patton (Eds.), The Indo-Aryan controversy: Evidence and inference in Indian history (pp. 341–404). Abingdon: Routledge.
Wongthes, M. (2003). Intellectual might and ational myth: A forensic investigation of the Ram Khamhaeng controversy in Thai society. Bangkok, Thailand: Matichon.
Wright, R. (1998). Sociolinguistic and ideological dynamics of the Ebonics controversy. The Journal of Negro Education 671, 5–15.
Yap, A. C. (2016). South Asian Community Debates “South Asia”, “India” Ahead of Textbook Updates. NBCNews, May 16, 2016. Available at [URL]
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Ngue Um, Emmanuel
Ngué Um, Emmanuel
2020. Had Ferdinand de Saussure spoken Wolof or Basaa…, the discipline of
linguistics would have fared differently. Language, Culture and Society 2:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Leeman, Jennifer
2020. The nexus of academic knowledge, political agendas, and
self-identification in census ethnoracial classification. Language, Culture and Society 2:1 ► pp. 92 ff.
Tupas, Ruanni
2020. Experts and the geopolitics of knowledge
production. Language, Culture and Society 2:1 ► pp. 116 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
