Cover not available

Article published In: Language, Context and Text
Vol. 3:2 (2021) ► pp.247273

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (33)
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. 1961. The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 1998. Negation, ‘presupposition’ and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Journal of Linguistics 34 (2). 309–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christie, Frances. & James R. Martin. 1997. Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delogu, Francesca. 2009. Presupposition. In Jef Vershueren & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Key notions for pragmatics, 195–207. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Don, Alexanne. 2017. Stance-taking and the construal of textual persona in written contexts: Social contact revisited. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 13 (1–2). 70–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, Walker. 1950. Authors, speakers, readers, and mock readers. College English 11 (5). 164–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1989. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1999. Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, 219–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The meaning of ‘not’ is not in ‘not’. In Ahmar Mahboob & Naomi Knight (eds.), Appliable linguistics, 267–306. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick, Susan Feez & Peter R. R. White. 1994. Media literacy. Sydney, New South Wales: Sydney, Disadvantaged Schools Program, NSW Department of School Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth M. 1975. Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunter. 1985. Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macken-Horarik, Mary & James R. Martin. 2003. Negotiating heteroglossia: Social perspectives on evaluation (special edition of Text, Issue 23, v.2). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2000. Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and construction of discourse, 142–175. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose. 2008. Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London & New York: Palgrave/Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald. 1980. Introduction to the study of the narratee. In Jane P. Tompkins (ed.), Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism, 7–25. Baltimore: JHU John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, Wolf. 2014. Implied reader. In Peter Hühn, Jan Meister, John Pier & Wolf Schmid (eds.), Handbook of narratology, 301–309. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, Peter R. R. White & Karin Aijmer. 2007. Presupposition and ‘taking for granted’ in mass communicated political argument. In Anita Fetzer & Gerda E. Lauerbach (eds.), Political discourse in the media, 31–74. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen E. 2003. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, Peter R. R. 1998. Telling media tales: The news story as rhetoric. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. In Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill & Frances Rock (eds.), Working with dialogue, 67–80. Berlin: Tübingen, Max Niemeyer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. Appraisal-the language of evaluation and stance. In Jef Vershueren, Jan-Ola Östman & Jan Blommaert (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 1–23. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text 23 (3). 259–284.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020a. Attitudinal alignments in journalistic commentary and social-media argumentation: The construction of values-based group identities in the online comments of newspaper readers. In Michele Zappavigna & Shoshana Dreyfus (eds.), Discourses of hope and reconciliation: On J. R. Martin’s contribution to systemic functional linguistics, 21–49. London & Oxford: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020b. The putative reader in mass media persuasion – stance, argumentation and ideology. Discourse & Communication 14 (4). 404–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021. Textual anticipation and the putative reader in persuasive discourse. Journal of Foreign Languages 44 (1). 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, Peter. R. R. & Motoki Sano. 2006. Dialogistic positions and anticipated audiences-a framework for stylistic comparisons. In Karin Aijmer & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (eds.), Pragmatic markers in contrast, 191–214. Frankfurt: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2014. Enacting identity in microblogging through ambient affiliation. Discourse & Communication 8 (2). 209–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Ambient affiliation and Brexit. In Veronkia Koller, Susanne Kopf & Marlene Miglbauer (eds.), Discourses of Brexit, 85–113. London & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

L. Mangana, Mellianne
2025. Evaluative Language in Op-eds: An Assessment of Attitudes and Voices toward Leni Robredo during the 2022 Philippine Elections. Journal of Contemporary Social Sciences and Humanities 12:2  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
White, Paul B.
2025. Contrasting the Reader Positioning Strategies in the Environmental Discourse of Greenpeace UK and Greenpeace France. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 17:1  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Chenghui & Ya Sun
2025. “Presenting Myself With Readers in Texts”: Analyzing Evidentiality in the Credibility-Building Discourse for Chinese State-Owned Enterprises on Twitter/X. International Journal of Business Communication DOI logo
Poucke, Margo Van
2024. ‘Do not parade your ignorance’: Negation as a power tool of toxic geek masculinity. SN Social Sciences 4:2 DOI logo
Xu, Qingxin
2024. Identifying disputants’ attitudinal variations in family mediations: A data mining approach. Discourse Studies 26:5  pp. 693 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Qingxin & Xiaoyan Xiao
2024. Deaf translator’s visibility in political discourse: a dialogic positioning perspective. Perspectives 32:2  pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Oteíza, Teresa
2023. Graduating points of view in Spanish written language. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 5:1  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jiawei & Zhiying Xin
2023. A novel multi-dimensional analysis of reply, response and rejoinder articles: When discipline meets time. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 65  pp. 101286 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue