Cover not available

Article In: SFL Appliability, Visibility and Accessibility
Edited by Claudia E. Stoian, Jorge Arús-Hita and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
[Language, Context and Text 7:2] 2025
► pp. 418–447

A systemic functional account of modal verbs in late modern English women’s instructive writing (1700–1900)

ORCiD logo with link | Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This study traces changes in the use of modal verbs in women’s instructive writing between 1700 and 1900, examining how these forms shaped interpersonal meaning within the systemic functional framework. Drawing on the Corpus of Women’s Instructive Texts in English (CoWITE), the analysis explores shifts in modalisation and modulation in recipe writing as an example of technical discourse of the period. The findings reveal a move away from strong obligation markers (must, shall) towards more advisory modals (may, might, should), suggesting a shift in rhetorical strategies to engage readers in a more consultative manner. Statistical analyses highlight significant changes in modal preferences, particularly a growing reliance on modalising forms in the 19th century. These patterns suggest that women adapted their instructive writing to balance authority with accessibility in an attempt to make their discourse both authoritative and engaging for their readership.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The systemic functional approach to modality
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Quantitative results on core modal verbs in women’s instructive writing
  • 5.Discussion: Interpersonal meaning and diachronic trends
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
References (58)
References
Alonso Almeida, Francisco. 2013. Genre conventions in English recipes, 1600–1800. In Michelle Di Meo & Sara Pennell (eds.), Reading and writing recipe books, 1550–1800, 68–92. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024. “As the coke and the phisicion wyll agre & deuyse”: Language cues and potential users of medieval English medical and culinary recipes. In Recipes and book culture in England, 1350–1600, 21–40. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco, Francisco Álvarez-Gil & Ivalla Ortega-Barrera. 2025a. Corpus of Women’s Instructive Texts in English (1700–1799) (CoWITE18). Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco, Francisco José Álvarez-Gil, Ivalla Ortega-Barrera, Elena Quintana-Toledo, Magdalena Bator, Isabel de la Cruz Cabanillas, Margarita Esther Sánchez-Cuervo & María José Gómez. 2025b. Corpus of Women’s Instructive Texts in English (1800–1899) (CoWITE18). Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Álvarez-Gil, Francisco José & Elena Domínguez Morales. 2018. Modal verbs in the abstract genre in the field of tourism. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 24(2). 27–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Álvarez-Gil, Francisco José & Isabel Soto-Déniz. 2024. Modal verbs and interpersonal meaning in 19th-century female instructive writing. In María del Olmo-Ibáñez & Antonio Vega Lopez (eds.), Building knowledge: Visions from education and the humanities, 31–48. Bern: Peter Lang Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arús-Hita, Jorge. 2021. Pushing SFL out of its comfort zone: The role of SPCA structure in English and Spanish. Lingua 2611. 102909. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de la Cruz-Cabanillas, Isabel. 2017. Genre and text-type conventions in Early Modern women’s recipe books. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 121. 13–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1993. English historical syntax: Verbal constructions. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Domínguez Morales, Elena & Isabel Soto Déniz. 2024. Deontic modality in tourism scientific writing. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 301. 84–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd edition). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.). 2012. Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo. 2018. A stepwise method for annotating appraisal. Functions of Language 25(2). 229–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, Xiang. 2016. Evaluation in US and Japanese history textbooks. Text & Talk 36(2). 221–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1989. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hao, Jing. 2020. Analysing scientific discourse from a systemic functional linguistic perspective: A framework for exploring knowledge construction in biology. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, Qingshun. 2021. A corpus-based study of interpersonal metaphors of modality in English. Studia Neophilologica 93(1). 50–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hood, Susan. 2019. Appraisal. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lisa Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 382–409. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kadooka, Ken-Ichi. 2021. A contrastive study of the English and Japanese modality systems. In Ken-Ichi. Kadooka (ed.), Japanese mood and modality in systemic functional linguistics: Theory and application, 101–132. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lastres-López, Cristina. 2020. Beyond conditionality: On the pragmaticalization of interpersonal if-constructions in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 1571. 68–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Dongqi. 2023. A systemic functional typology of MOOD. Singapore: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 2000. Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In S. Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & David Rose. 2007. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd edition). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter Robert R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neupane Bastola, Madhu & Guangwei Hu. 2021. “Commenting on your work is a waste of time only!”: An appraisal-based study of evaluative language in supervisory feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation 681. 100962. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Mick. 2020. Dynamic modelling of context: Field, tenor and mode revisited. Lingua 2611. 102952. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and modality (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Introducing functional grammar (3rd edition). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Susan Hunston. 2000. Evaluation: An introduction. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werlich, Egon. 1976. A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Primary data
Bradley, Martha. 1750. The British housewife. London: S. Crowder and H. Woodgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, Charles. 1885. Plain cookery recipes, as taught in the school. London: William Clowes & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cobbett, Anne. 1835. The English housekeeper: Or, manual of domestic management. London: Anne Cobbett.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, Mary. 1789. The lady’s complete guide; or cookery and confectionary in all their branches. London: G. Kearsley. [URL]
Cust, Mary Anne Boode Lady. 1853. The invalid’s own book: A collection of recipes from various books and various countries. New York: Appleton and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Earle, Maude. 1897. Sickroom cookery and hospital diet. London: Spottiswoode.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, L. C. 1703. Collection of cookery receipts, with some medical receipts. [URL]
Frazer, M. 1791. The practice of cookery, pastry, pickling, preserving. T. Cadell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haddock, D. 1720. Recipe book of Mrs Deborah Haddock. [Manuscript] [URL]
Harrison, Sarah. 1733. The house-keeper’s pocket-book and complete family cook. London: R. Ware.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haslehurst, Priscilla. 1814. The family friend, and young woman’s companion. Sheffield: C. & W. Thompson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, M. 1740. Mrs. Johnston’s receipts for all sorts of pastry. Edinburgh.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kettilby, Mary. 1714. A collection of above three hundred receipts. London: Richard Wilkin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacIver, Susanne. 1774. Cookery, and pastry. Edinburgh: Stephen Law’s Close & W. Drummond, W. Gray, C. Elliot, and other booksellers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, Mary. 1871. The young housewife’s counsellor and friend. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Putnam, Mrs. Elizabeth. 1849. Mrs. Putnam’s receipt book. Boston: Ticknor, Reed, and Fields.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Randolph, Mary. 1824. The Virginia house-wife. Washington: Davis and Force.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rundell, Maria Eliza. 1806. A new system of domestic cookery. London: J. Murray and J. Harding.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shackleford, Ann. 1767. The modern art of cookery improved. London: J. Newberry.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Prudence. 1831. Modern American cookery. New York: J. & J. Harper.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittenmyer, Annie. 1864. A collection of recipes for the use of special diet kitchens in military hospitals. St. Louis: R.P. Studley and Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue