Article In: SFL Appliability, Visibility and Accessibility
Edited by Claudia E. Stoian, Jorge Arús-Hita and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
[Language, Context and Text 7:2] 2025
► pp. 386–417
Improving accessibility of SFG
A multimodal approach to teaching SFG in an undergraduate classroom
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This paper explores the use of multimodal tools in the undergraduate classroom to learn Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG). SFG helps students understand how language creates meaning, fostering their ability to analyse different types of texts. However, SFG’s complex concepts often present teaching challenges. This case study proposes a multimodal approach integrating resources such as conceptual maps, songs, and memes, to make SFG concepts more accessible. It draws from an undergraduate course at a university in Spain, which uses a practical learning approach to help students actively engage with multimodal artefacts, reinforcing their understanding of SFG concepts. The paper illustrates how multimodal resources can support students’ comprehension of the appliability of SFG as a theory of language, with a prosumer approach.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Fostering SFL applicability by improving accessibility
- 3.Affordances of multimodal learning
- 4.Case study: Teaching SFG in a Spanish university
- 5.Multimodal activities for teaching SFG
- 5.1Multimodal activities and theoretical learning
- 5.1.1Conceptual Mapping
- 5.1.2Songs
- 5.1.3Memes
- 5.2Multimodal activities and practical learning
- 5.2.1SFL and multimodality
- 5.2.2How can we apply SFG to literary analysis?
- 5.1Multimodal activities and theoretical learning
- 6.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (70)
Ainsworth, Shaaron. 2008. The educational value of multi-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In John K. Gilbert, Mariam Reiner & Mary Nakhleh (eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 3, 191–208. Springer: Dordrecht.
Ally Hussein, Pascal. 2015. Linguistics and Literary Criticism: Shall the Twain Never Meet? International Journal of Innovation and Scientific 15(2). 473–481. [URL]
Arús-Hita, Jorge. 2024, July 10–12. SFL visibility and accessibility to/across languages, linguistic disciplines and academic profiles [Plenary presentation]. 33rd European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference, Timișoara, Romania. [URL]
Arús-Hita, Jorge & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2024. Systemic Functional Linguistics: Accessibility and visibility across languages, academic profiles and disciplines. EPOS Revista de Filología 401. 3–34.
Arús-Hita, Jorge, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Winfred Wenhui Xuan. 2024. Learning how to mean in a second language: Uses of system networks in L2 education. Journal of World Languages 10(1). 9–50.
Banegas, Darío Luis. 2021. Understanding the impact of teaching systemic functional grammar in initial English language teacher education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 31(3). 492–507.
Bellezza, Francis S. 1981. Mnemonic devices: Classification, characteristics, and criteria. Review of Educational Research 51(2). 247–275.
Bourke, James Mannes. 2005. The grammar we teach. Reflections on English Language Teaching 41. 85–97.
Buch, Bettina. 2020. Using SFL as a powerful tool for analyzing multimodal texts from vocational education. Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication 101. 67–81. [URL]
Carney, Russel N. 2011. Mnemonic Device. In Goldstein, Sam & Jack A. Naglieri (eds.), Enciclopedia of child behavior and development, 958–961. Boston, MA: Springer.
Chanock, Kate. 2002. Using systemic functional linguistics in university teaching: A postgraduate class on making writing more ‘readable’. Monash University Linguistics Papers 2(1). 61–67.
Christie, Frances. 2016. Genres and institutions: functional perspectives on educational discourse. Discourse and Education 1–13.
Christie, Frances & J. R. Martin (eds.). 2007. Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Correa, Doris & Camilo Domínguez. 2014. Using SFL as a tool for analyzing students’ narratives. HOW, A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English 21(2). 112–133.
Crowther, Gregory. 2012. Using science songs to enhance learning: An interdisciplinary approach. CBE-Life Sciences Education 111. 26–30.
Dean, Deborah. 2011. “EJ” in focus: Shifting perspectives about grammar: Changing what and how we teach. The English Journal 100(4). 20–26.
Delogu, Franco, Antonino Raffone & Marta Olivetti Belardinelli. 2009. Semantic encoding in working memory: Is there a (multi)modality effect? Memory 17(6). 655–663.
Eisenlauer, Volker & Styliani Karatza. 2021. Multimodal literacies: Media affordances, semiotic resources and discourse communities. Journal of Visual Literacy 39 (3–4). 125–131.
Elorza, Izaskun. 2022. Ideational construal of male challenging gender identities in children’s picture books. Jesús Moya-Guijarro & Eija Ventola (eds.), A multimodal approach to challenging gender stereotypes in children’s picture books, 42–68. New York: Routledge.
. 2023a. Gender-inclusive picture books in the classroom: A multimodal analysis of male subjective agencies. Linguistics and Education 781. 101241.
. 2023b. System networks: A multimodal analysis toolkit for representations of migrants and migration. Gredos Repository. [URL]
French, Ruth. 2013. Teaching and learning functional grammar in junior primary classrooms. PhD dissertation. University of New England, Australia.
Gebhard, Meg, I-An Chen, Holly Graham & Wawan Gunawan. 2013. Teaching to mean, writing to mean: SFL, L2 literacy, and teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing 22(2). 107–124.
Governor, Donna, Jori Hall & David Jackson. 2013. Teaching and Learning Science Through Song: Exploring the experiences of students and teachers. International Journal of Science Education 35(18). 3117–3140.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
1985. Systemic background. In James D. Benson & William S. Greaves (eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse, 1–15. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. Oxon: Routledge.
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2002. Semiotic mediation, language and society: Three exotripic theories — Vygotsky, Halliday and Berstein. The Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. [URL]
Ishida, Dianne, Patricia McKnight, Sandra Solem, Jane Tanaka & Lorrie Wong. 2013. Multimodal teaching strategies: A “student friendly” approach. Journal of Nursing Education 33(4). 163–165.
Jakubowski, Kelly & Anita Ghosh. 2019. Music-evoked autobiographical memories in everyday life. Psychology of Music 49(3). 649–666.
Kasumu, Rebeca Oluwayimika. 2022. Concept mapping as a teaching strategy: Benefits and challenges in higher institution. International Journal of Trendy Research in Engineering and Technology 6(6). 5–10. [URL]
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2021. Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd edition). London: Routledge.
Levitin, Daniel J. & Lindsay Fleming. 2024. Music and Memory. In Michael J. Kahana & Anthony D. Wagner (eds.), The Oxford handbook of human memory, two volume pack: Foundations and applications, 2214–2227. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lummis, Sarah N., Jennifer Mccabe, Abigail L. Sickles, Rebecca A. Byler, Sarah Hochberg, Sarah E. Eckart & Corinne E. Kahler. 2017. Lyrical memory: Mnemonic effects of music for musicians and nonmusicians. Psi chi journal of psychology research 22(2). 141–150.
Luo, Heng. 2023. Editorial: Advances in multimodal learning: pedagogies, technologies, and analytics. Educational Psychology 141. 1286092.
Marco Reus, Nerea. 2025. Reseña del libro: Marquete, B., López-Cortés, N. y Ariño-Bizarro, A. (2022) (eds.). Avances de la Lingüística y su aplicación didáctica. ELUA 431. 331–333.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2011. Systemic functional linguistics as appliable linguistics: social accountability and critical approaches. DELTA 281. 435–471.
2024, July 10–12. SFL Accessibility across Disciplinary, Professional and Modes of Communication Borders [Plenary presentation]. 33rd European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference, Timișoara, Romania.
McCabe, Anne, Christopher Gledhill & Kevin Liu. 2015. Systemic functional linguistics and English language teaching. TESOL International Journal 10(1). 1–10. [URL]
Mehta, Jal & Amanda Datnow. 2020. Changing the grammar of schooling: An appraisal and a research agenda. American Journal of Education 126 (4). 491–498.
Miller, Donna R. & Monica Turci. 2007. Language and verbal art revisited: Linguistic approaches to the study of literature. London: Equinox.
Mills, Kathy Ann & Len Unsworth. 2017. Multimodal literacy. In Noblit, George W. (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Myhill, Debra, Susan Jones, Annabel Watson & Helen Lines. 2012. Playful explicitness with grammar: A pedagogy for writing. Literacy 47(2). 103–111.
Nguyen, Thu Hanh. 2021. Improving writing skills with systemic functional linguistic approach: The case of Vietnamese EFL students. World Journal of English Language 11(2). 71–83. [URL]
Nieto Cruz, María Claudia. 2019. The Role of Systemic Functional Grammar in the Expansion of Nominal Groups. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development 21(2). 97–112. [URL]
Painter, Clare, J. R. Martin & Len Unsworth. 2013. Reading visual narratives: image analysis of children’s picture books. Sheffield: Equinox.
Pellerin, Martine. 2020. Digital learning environments, multimodal and sensory affordances: reshaping the second language experience for a new era. In Karen Margrete Frederiksen et al. (eds.), CALL for widening participation: Short papers from EUROCALL 2020, 279–285. Research-publishing.net.
Petrucco, Corrado. 2022. Memes in teaching and learning processes: A semiotics of cognitive activation. Italian Journal of Educational Research 291. 23–33.
Purnell-Webb, Patricia & Craig P. Speelman. 2008. Effects of music on memory for text. Perceptual and motor skills 106(3). 927–957.
Rao, Deepa & Ieva Stupans. 2012. Exploring the potential of role play in higher education: development of a typology and teacher guidelines. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49(4). 427–436.
Romero, Carmen, Moisés Cazorla & Olga Buzón. 2017. Meaningful learning using concept maps as a learning strategy. Journal of Technology and Science Education 7(3). 313–332.
Schulkind, Matthew D. 2009. Is memory for music special?. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1169(1). 216–224.
Sorohiti, Maryam, Harun Noor Rochman Nugraha & Fitria Rahmawati. 2024. Teacher awareness, identification of learning difficulties, and effective teaching strategies for English grammar mastery. Indonesian EFL Journal 10(1). 45–54.
Stalinski, Stephanie M. & E. Glenn Schellenberg. 2013. Listeners remember music they like. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory and cognition 39(3). 700–716.
Stefanucci, Jeanine K. & Dennis R. Proffitt. 2005. Multimodal interfaces improve memory. In Dylan D. Schmorrow (ed.), Foundations of Augmented Cognition. 13–20. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Torre, Dario, Deborah German, Barbara Daley & David Taylor. 2023. Concept mapping: An aid to teaching and learning: AMEE guide no. 157. Medical Teacher 45(5). 455–463.
Trevisan, Piergiorgio & Adolfo M. García. 2019. Systemic functional grammar as a tool for experimental stimulus design: new appliable horizons in psycholinguistics and neurolinguistics. Language Sciences 751. 35–46.
Troyan, Francis John, José David Herazo & Marianna Ryshina-Pankova. 2022. SFL pedagogies in language education: Special issue introduction. System 1041. 102694.
Turgut Dost, Güliz. 2021. Impact of a systemic functional linguistic informed course on teacher candidates’ knowledge about genre and language. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 17(1). 281–300. [URL].
Voss, Scott M. 2011. The affordances of multimodal texts and their impact on the reading process. PhD dissertation. University of Minnesota, USA.
Vygotsky, Lev. 1981. The instrumental method in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed. and. Trans.) The concept of activity in Soviet psychology, 134–143, Armonk, NY M.E. Sharpe.
Wallace, Wanda T. 1994. Memory for music: Effect of melody on recall of text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory and cognition 20(6). 1471–1485.
Wammes, Jeffrey D., Tanya R. Jonker & Myra A. Fernandes. 2019. Drawing improves memory: The importance of multimodal encoding context. Cognition 1911. 103955.
Williams, Geoffrey. 2005. Grammatics in schools. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language, 281–310. London: Equinox Publishing Ldt.
Winarsih, Dwi. 2013. Students’ mastery of systemic functional grammar and its classroom implementation: A naturalistic study at English department of Tidar university. Journal Penelitian Humaniora 14(2). 101–113.
