Article In: SFL Appliability, Visibility and Accessibility
Edited by Claudia E. Stoian, Jorge Arús-Hita and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
[Language, Context and Text 7:2] 2025
► pp. 328–355
SFL textual metafunction perspectives on the BUAP Code of Conduct and Ethics
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This article presents an analysis of the code of conduct and ethics of the second most prestigious public university in Mexico, the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP). These regulations are meant to officially represent the ethical stance of the entire university with more than 95,000 members. The study aims to identify prevalent textual characteristics of the document through a systemic functional linguistic (SFL) analysis of the textual metafunction, including the identification of tendencies in Marked and Unmarked Themes and MOOD (. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. ). The findings could provide an insight into the nature of such regulatory texts as well as providing guidance towards their improvement as the university moves towards the new 2030 Agenda of the United Nations (Naciones Unidas. 2018. La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: Una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe [The 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals: An opportunity for Latin America and the Caribbean]. [URL]. (10 February, 2025.)).
Article outline
- 1.Introducing the study
- 2.From semiology to SFL
- 3.Metafunctions
- 4.The textual metafunction
- 4.1Theme
- 4.2Classification of themes
- 4.2.1Marked theme vs unmarked theme
- 4.2.2Macro-themes vs thematised values
- 5.Context
- 6.BUAP’s code of conduct and ethics
- 7.Research design
- 8.Results
- 9.Discussion
- 10.Conclusions
References
References (56)
Arús Hita, Jorge. 2017. Theme in Spanish. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 194–212. New York: Routledge.
Arús Hita, Jorge & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2024. Systemic functional linguistics: Accessibility and visibility across languages, academic profiles and disciplines. Epos Revista de filología 401. 3–34.
Bello, Iria. 2016. Cognitive implications of nominalizations in the advancement of scientific discourse. International Journal of English Studies 16(2). 1–23. 16.1.10.6018/ijes/2016/2/262921.
Bretón, Angeles. 2024. Qué lugar ocupa la BUAP en la lista de mejores universidades del mundo [What place does BUAP occupy in the list of the best universities in the world?]. Educación [Education]. El Universal Puebla. [URL]. (10 February, 2025.)
BUAP. n.d.a. Misión [Mission]. Nosotros [We]. [URL]. (10 February, 2025.)
. n.d.b. Visión [View]. Nosotros [We]. [URL]. (10 February, 2025.)
. n.d.c. ¿Quiénes somos? [Who are we?]. Nosotros [We]. Coordinación General de Atención a los Universitarios [the general department of university student services]. [URL]. (10 February, 2025.)
. n.d.d. Ediciones Gaceta Universidad [University Gaceta editions]. Dirección de Comunicación Institucional [The directorate of institutional communication]. [URL]. (10 February, 2025.)
. 2023. Anuario Estadístico 2022–2023 [The statistical yearbook from 2022 to 2023]. BUAP en números [BUAP in numbers]. [URL]. (10 February, 2025.)
Burrell, Gibson, Michael. R. Hyman, Christopher Michaelson, Julie A. Nelson, Scott Taylor & Andrew West. 2022. The ethics and politics of academic knowledge production: Thoughts on the future of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 1801. 917–940. [URL]
Caffarel-Cayron, Alice, James Robert Martin & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen (eds.). 2004. Language typology: A functional perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Chartered Institute of Linguists. n.d. Professional Code of Conduct. [URL]. (10 February, 2025.)
Creswell, John. W. & J. David Creswell. 2018. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. London: SAGE Publications.
Davidse, Kristin. 1987. M.A.K. Halliday’s functional grammar and the Prague school. In René Dirven & Vilém Fried (eds.), Functionalism in linguistics (Linguistic and literary studies in Eastern Europe 20). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 39–79.
Deng, Xudong. 2022. Exploring Thematic analysis as a possible self-revision method for ESLIEFL writers. Centre for English Language Communication. National University of Singapore. [URL] (26 March, 2025.)
Downing-Rothwell, Angela. 1997. Encapsulating discourse topics. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 51. 147–168.
Emilia, Emi & Fuad Abdul Hamied. 2015. Systemic Functional Linguistic Genre Pedagogy (SFL GP) In a tertiary EFL writing context in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal — A publication on the teaching and learning of English 261. 155–182.
Forey, Gail. 2020. A whole school approach to SFL metalanguage and the explicit teaching of language for curriculum learning. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 441. 100822.
Forey, Gail & Nicholas Sampson. 2017. Textual metafunction and Theme: What’s ‘it’ about? In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics. Abingdon, U. K.: Routledge. 131–145.
García, Ofelia & Cristian Solorza, R. 2020. Academic language and the minoritization of U.S. bilingual Latinx students. Language and Education 35(2). 1–17.
Gobierno de México. n.d.a. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma De Puebla [Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla]. Data México. [URL]. (10 February, 2025.)
. n.d.b. Norma Jurídica [Legal standard]. Sistema de Información Legislativa (SIL) [Legislative nformation system]. [URL]. (10 February, 2025.)
Gopalakrishnan, Anuradha, Corinne S. Mathieu & Darren K. LaScotte. 2024. Investigating mixed methods research in applied linguistics: Methodological avoidance and possible barriers in the field. Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL 24(1). 1–20.
Haji, Ghada. 2023. SFL-based analysis of thematic progression of English graduate personal statements. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Learning 26(2). 440–453. [URL].
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967/1968. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics 311: 37–81, 321: 199–244, 421: 179–215.
1977. Text as semantic choice in social contexts. In Teun A. van Dijk and János Petofi (eds.). Grammars and descriptions: Studies in text theory and text analysis, 176–225. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
1995. Language and the theory of codes. In A. R. Sadovnik (ed.), Knowledge and pedagogy: The sociology of Basil Bernstein, 127–144. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
2004. On the language of physical science. In J. Webster (ed.), The language of physical science, 162–178. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1989 [1985]. Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.
. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar (3rd edition). London: University Press Hodder Arnold.
Huang, Guowen. 2017. Theme in the Cardiff Grammar. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 163–177. New York: Routledge.
Jensen, Klaus Bruhn. 2001. Semiotics. In Neil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 13887–13891. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Martin, James Robert. 1991. Intrinsic functionality: Implications for contextual theory. Social Semiotics 1(1). 99–162.
Martin, J. R. 1992. English text: System and structure. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Martin, J. R. & Peter Robert White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2004. The evolution of language: A systemic functional exploration of phylogenetic phases. In Geoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin (eds.), Language development: Functional perspectives on evolution and ontogenesis, 45–90. London: Continuum.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Kazuhiro Teruya. 2024. Systemic functional linguistics: A complete guide. London: Routledge.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Kazuhiro Teruya & Marvin Lam. 2010. Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. In Kazuhiro Teruya & Marvin Lam (eds.). 1st ed. London: Continuum.
McMillan, James H. & Sally Schumacher. 2005. Investigación educativa [Educational research] (5th edition). Spain: Pearson Addison Wesley.
Naciones Unidas. 2018. La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: Una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe [The 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals: An opportunity for Latin America and the Caribbean]. [URL]. (10 February, 2025.)
Órgano Oficial de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. 2014. Lineamientos del Código de Ética y Conducta de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla [The code of ethics and conduct regulations of the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla]. GACETA Universidad BUAP Suplemento. 182–XXXIII1. 1–8. [URL] (10 February, 2025.)
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959. Course in general linguistics. Edited by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye. New York: Philosophical Library.
Sembiante, Sabrina F. & Tian Zhongfeng. 2021. Culturally sustaining approaches to academic languaging through systemic functional linguistics. Language and Education 35(2). 101–105.
Sukarno, Sukarno. 2014. Topic development and Thematic patterns for the Indonesian text of Friday sermons. Humaniora 26(3). 315–327.
Tesorería General. 2024. Estado analítico de ingresos (por rubro y Fuente de Financiamiento) [Analytical income statement (by category and Financing Source)]. Información Financiera de Acuerdo a la Ley General de Contabilidad Gubernamental LGCG y Normas del Consejo Nacional de Armonización Contable CONAC [Financial Information According to the General Law of Government Accounting LGCG and Standards of the National Council for Accounting Harmonization CONAC]. BUAP. [URL] (10 February, 2025.)
Thompson, Geoff. 2007. Unfolding Theme: The development of clausal and textual perspectives on Theme. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian.M. I. M. Matthiessen and Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, 671–96. London: Equinox.
United Nations. n.d. Quality Education. Sustainable Development Goals. [URL]. (10 February, 2025).
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. 2014. Universidades Públicas Mexicanas Diversidad y complejidad Región Centro-Sur Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla [Mexican public universities diversity and complexity: Center-South Region: Benemérita Autonomous University of Puebla]. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. [URL]. (10 February, 2025.)
