Article In: SFL Appliability, Visibility and Accessibility
Edited by Claudia E. Stoian, Jorge Arús-Hita and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
[Language, Context and Text 7:2] 2025
► pp. 263–299
Teaching register through projects
Students’ perceptions and attitudes
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
The adherence to the discursive particularities imposed by the communicative and cultural situations of discourse is essential for conveying a message both intralingually and interlingually. As such, the concepts of genre and register are taught from a systemic functional perspective to the Translation and Interpreting and Communication and Public Relations students pursuing a bachelor’s degree at Politehnica University of Timișoara (Romania). The present study focuses on their opinions expressed through an online anonymised survey regarding a final project in which they analysed the register of a genre-relevant text. The survey findings revealed the students’ perceptions and attitudes towards learning about genre and register through project-based activities, highlighting that these supported their better understanding of the concepts and helped them develop essential professional soft skills.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Project-based teaching and learning
- 3.Research design and methodology
- 4.Analysis of research results
- 5.Concluding remarks
References
References (39)
Anyushenkova, Olga N., Olesya Yu Digtyar, Tatiana A. Karpova, Angela S. Voskovskaya & Fabiola Bottigliero. 2020. Project-based learning (PBL) as a tool for teaching foreign languages to students of non-linguistic universities. Revista Espacios 41(06). 9.
Bell, Stephanie. 2010. Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 831. 39–43.
Bender, William N. 2012. Project-based learning: Differentiating instruction for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Blumenfeld, Phyllis C., Elliot Soloway, Ronald W. Marx, Joseph S. Krajcik, Mark Guzdial & Annemarie Palincsar. 1991. Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist 26(3–4). 369–398.
Chi, Do Na. 2023. Benefits of implementing project-b learning in an English for business course. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies 10(3). 55–71.
Clark, Ann Marie. 2006. Changing classroom practice to include the Project Approach. Early Child. Research & Practice 8(2). 150–172.
Clark, Bethany A. 2017. Project Based Learning: Assessing and measuring student participation. Research and Evaluation in Education, Technology, Art, and Design 391. [URL]
Derewianka, Beverly & Pauline Jones. 2016. Teaching language in context (2nd edition). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Easter, Beth A. & Beverly Evans. 2014. Student views of class projects as learning experiences. SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education 29(2). 25–42.
Eby, Judy W., Adrienne L. Herrell & Michael Jordan. 2009. Teaching in the elementary school: A reflective action approach (5th edition). London: Pearson.
Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd edition). London: Continuum.
Fernández Martínez, Dolores. 2011. Introducing discourse analysis in class. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Granado-Alcón, María del Carmen, Diego Gómez-Baya, Eva Herrera-Gutiérrez, Mercedes Vélez-Toral, Pilar Alonso-Martín & María Teresa Martínez-Frutos. 2020. Project-based learning and the acquisition of competencies and knowledge transfer in higher education. Sustainability 12(23). 10062.
Gómez-Baya, Diego, María del Carmen Granado-Alcón, Itziar Benítez-Montagut & Ramon Mendoza-Berjano. 2019. Competence development, student valuation and knowledge transference after cooperative project-based learning. Proceedings of the ICERI2019 Conference, Seville, Spain, 11–13 November 2019. 3527–3530.
Guo, Pengyue; Nadira Saab, Lysanne S. Post & Wilfried Admiraal. 2020. A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research 1021. 101586.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Han, Sunyoung; Bugrahan Yalvac, Mary M. Capraro & Robert M. Capraro. 2015. In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of STEM Project Based Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 11(1). 63–76.
Hansen, Randall S. 2006. Benefits and problems with student teams: Suggestions for improving team projects. Journal of Education for Business 82(1). 11–19.
Jones, Beau Fly, Claudette M. Rasmussen & Mary C. Moffitt. 1997. Real-life problem solving: A collaborative approach to interdisciplinary learning. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Kasbary, Nicole & Aghnar Haymour. 2022. Learning through projects in the classroom: Project-based learning guide. 4th World Conference on Research in TEACHING and EDUCATION, 18–10 March 2022, Prague, Check Republic. [URL] (5.01.2025).
Marwan, Ardi. 2015. Empowering English through project-based learning with ICT. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 14(4). 28–37.
Marx, Ronald W., Phyllis C. Blumenfeld, Joseph S. Krajcik, Merrie Blunk, Barbara Crawford, Beverly Kelly & Karen M. Meyer. 1994. Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers. Elementary School Journal 941. 517–538. [URL].
Mioduser, David & Nadav Betzer. 2007. The contribution of project-based learning to high achievers’ acquisition of technological knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 2008 181. 59–77.
Oranpattanachai, Pornpun. 2018. Thai Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Video Project Assignments. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal 11(1). 170–82.
Resnick, Lauren B. 1991. Perspectives on socially shared cognition. In Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine & Stephanie D. Teasley (eds.), Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice, 1–20. Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association.
Ryan, Richard M. & Edward L. Deci. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Education Psychology 25(1). 54–67.
Santoso, R. Tri Priyono Budi, Sony Heru Priyanto, I. Wayan Ruspendi Junaedi, Donald Samuel Slamet Santoso & Lasmono Tri Sunaryanto. 2023. Project-based entrepreneurial learning (PBEL): A blended model for startup creations at higher education institutions. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 121. 18.
Șimon, Simona. 2014. The persuasive function of written advertisements. Cluj-Napoca: Casa Cărții de Știință, Timişoara: Editura Orizonturi Universitare.
. 2002. Defining the Advertisement as Genre. In Rodica Superceanu & Daniel Dejica (eds.), Lucrările conferinţei internaţionale: Comunicare profesională şi traductologie, 170–176. Timişoara: Editura Orizonturi Universitare.
Şimon, Simona & Claudia E. Stoian. 2020. Discovering the discourse of advertising, International Journal of Communication Research 10(4). 370–377.
Șimon, Simona & Claudia E. Stoian. 2025. Teaching pragmatics through projects: A students’ perspective. Sage Open, January-March 2025, 1–12.
Starkings, Susan. 1997. Assessing student projects. In Iddo Gal & Joan B. Garfield (eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education, 139–151. IOS Press (on behalf of the ISI). [URL]
Stoian, Claudia. 2017. The importance of Thematic structure in teaching translation. Buletinul Ştiințific al Universității Politehnica Timişoara, Seria Limbi moderne 16(1). 35–44.
Stoian, Claudia E. 2020. Language and image: Advertising discourse across cultures. Szeged: Jate Press.
2022. Analysing the source text: A first step for a successful translation. Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timişoara 21(1). 89–102.
