Article published In: Language, Context and Text
Vol. 6:2 (2024) ► pp.446–462
Research notes
The text of the Bayeux Tapestry
Propaganda in the 11th century. A linguistic note
Published online: 3 December 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00079.ban
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00079.ban
Abstract
The Bayeux Tapestry, which strictly speaking is not a tapestry at all but a piece of embroidery, was produced in the late 11th century, probably commissioned by Odo, bishop of Bayeux, William the Conqueror’s half-brother. Its objective is to support William’s invasion and conquest of England. It can thus be seen as a piece of 11th century propaganda. It tells the story of Harold’s oath to support William’s claims to the English crown, his subsequent acceptance of the crown himself, followed by William’s invasion of England and Harold’s death at the Battle of Hastings in 1066. The images in the Tapestry are accompanied by a text in Latin. This paper analyses the transitivity of those clauses in this text where Harold and William occur. This shows how both of these protagonists are represented through the transitivity selections of the text. While both occur as Actor to the same extent, Harold functions as Affected much more frequently than William (including ultimately, getting killed!). In addition, William functions as Sayer more frequently than Harold, and usually with verbs that indicate his authority. Thus William is painted as an effective, authoritative ruler. Thus the text of the tapestry underlines the power of William following his conquest and enhances the empowerment which success in battle bestowed on him.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Partly personal
- 2.Linguistic framework
- 3.Transitivity and text analysis in SFL
- 4.The text and its analysis
- 5.Harold as Actor
- 6.William as Actor
- 7.Harold as Affected
- 8.Harold as Sayer
- 9.William as Sayer
- 10.Harold as Recipient
- 11.William as Recipient
- 12.Other occurrences
- 13.Clauses common to Harold and William
- 14.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
References
References (33)
Asp, Elissa & Jessica de Villiers. 2019. Clinical linguistics. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 587–619. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Banks, David. 1992. Men, Women and Transitivity in To the Lighthouse and A Farewell to Arms. In Yvon Tosser & Patrick Galliou (eds.), Mirroirs de la Femme dans la Littérature d’Expression Anglaise, Mélanges Offerts à Colette Caraës, 23–36. Brest: Groupe de Recherche sur le Roman et la Nouvelle de Langue Anglaise, Université de Bretagne Occidentale.
. 2008. The development of scientific writing: Linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox
. 2016. On the (non)necessity of the hybrid category behavioural process. In Donna R. Miller & Paul Bayley (eds.), Hybridity in systemic functional linguistics: Grammar, text and discursive context, 21–40. Sheffield: Equinox.
. 2017. The birth of the academic article. Le Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions 1665–1700, Sheffield, Equinox.
. 2021. “Un projet de justice et de progrès social”: President Macron’s 2020 new year message to the nation. A linguistic viewpoint. Text & Talk 42(3). 303–325.
Benson, James D., William S. Greaves & Glen Stillar. 1995. Transitivity and ergativity in “The Lotus-Easters”. Language and Literature 4(1). 31–48.
Chen, Lily. 2005. Transitivity in media texts: Negative verbal process sub-functions and narrator bias. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 43(1). 33–52.
Cummings, Michael. 2010. An introduction to the grammar of Old English. A systemic functional approach. London: Equinox.
2002[1971]. Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. In M. A. K. Halliday, Linguistic studies of text and discourse, volume 2 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 88–125. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). Abingdon: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1989. Linguistics, language and verbal art (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2007. Private pleasure, public discourse: Reflections on engaging with literature. In Donna R. Miller & Monica Turci (eds.), Language and verbal art revisited: Linguistic approaches to the study of literature, 13–40. London: Equinox.
Ji, Yinglin & Dan Shen. 2004. Transitivity and mental transformation: Sheila Watson’s The Double Hook. Language and Literature 13(4). 335–348.
Karimi, Neda, Alison Moore & Annabelle Lukin. 2018. Cancer care as an integrated practice: Consultations between an oncologist and patients with advanced, incurable cancer. In Akila Sellami-Baklouti & Lise Fontaine (eds.), Perspectives from systemic functional linguistics, 315–337. New York: Routledge.
Lepelley, René. 1964. Contribution à l’étude des inscriptions de la Tapisserie de Bayeux. Annales de Normandie 14(3). 313–321.
Lewin, Beverly A., Jonathan Fine & Lynne Young. 2001. Expository discourse. A genre-based approach to social science research texts. London: Continuum.
Lewis, Michael John. 2007. Identity and status in the Bayeux Tapestry: The iconographic and artefactual evidence. Anglo-Norman Studies 291. 100–120.
Martínez, Iliana A. 2001. Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity structure. English for Specific Purposes 20(3). 227–247.
Miller, Donna R. 2019. Language and literature. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 690–714. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Noxon, Gerald. 1968. The Bayeux Tapestry. Cinema Journal 71. 29–35. [URL]
O’Halloran, Kay L. 2005. Mathematical discourse, language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.
Pagano, Adriana & Annabelle Lukin. 2015. Exploring language in verbal art: A case study in K. Mansfield’s ‘Bliss’. In Sonia Starc, Carys Jones & Arianna Maiorani (eds.), Meaning making in text: Multimodal and multilingual functional perspectives, 92–108. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Riss, Anne-Marie. 2015. Une apparition intempestive dans la Broderie de Bayeux Essai d’élucidation, L’apparition dans les œuvres d’art, Caen, France. hal-02904505.
Thompson, Victoria. 1999. Kingship-in-death in the Bayeux Tapestry. Reading Medieval Studies 251. 107–121. [URL]
van Kempen, Ad F. J. 2009. The Mercian connection, Harold Godwineson’s ambitions, diplomacy and channel-crossing, 1056–1066, History 94(313). 2–19.
