Cover not available

Article published In: Language, Context and Text
Vol. 6:2 (2024) ► pp.390–417

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The linguistic construal of extreme behaviour

Hyperactivity-impulsivity in family and teaching communities

 | Cardiff University, United Kingdom
Published online: 3 December 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00076.vil
Abstract
Teaching and family communities usually have an active role in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity-Impulsivity Disorder (ADHD) diagnosis in childhood. Examining the construal of hyperactivity-impulsivity in teaching guidelines and online parental exchanges can elucidate common lay understandings of the trait. The study considers transitivity, with a focus on Relational and Behavioural clauses, lexical metaphors and appraisals. The linguistic descriptions have a potential to assist medical specialists in interpreting evidence presented by teaching and family communities in the complex task of diagnosing ADHD, facilitating communication and explaining the strategies used to avoid potentially stigmatising descriptions. The analysis supports the suitability of distinguishing Behavioural processes in transitivity and traces a parallelism between the metaphorical descriptions of extreme behaviour and those traditionally reported for strong emotions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.ADHD and hyperactivity-impulsivity
  • 3.Systemic functional linguistics, metaphors and control
    • 3.1The linguistic construal of experience and a note on Behavioural processes
    • 3.2SFL, metaphor and interpersonal meaning
    • 3.3A note on ADHD and control-related lexical metaphors
  • 4.Data and methodology
  • 5.Construal of extreme behaviour
    • 5.1Overview
    • 5.2Relational clauses
      • 5.2.1Defining hyperactive-impulsive behaviour
      • 5.2.2Reporting typical characterisations
      • 5.2.3Regular behaviours as character attributes and possessions
    • 5.3Behavioural clauses: Absence of self-direction and excessive activity
      • 5.3.1Erratic and excessive behaviour
      • 5.3.2Lack of behavioural control
  • 6.Concluding discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (38)
References
American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th edition). APA: Arlington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banks, David. 2016. On the (non)necessity of the hybrid category behavioural process. In Donna R. Miller & Paul Bayley (eds.), Hybridity in systemic functional linguistics: Grammar, text and discursive context, 21–40. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. A systemic functional grammar of English: A simple introduction. New York & Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barkley, Russell A. 1997. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin 121(1). 65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartlett, Tom. 2014. Analysing power in language: A practical guide. New York & Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, Max. 1979. More about metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 19–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloor, Thomas & Meriel Bloor. 2004. The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. London: Arnold. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2012. Shattering the bell jar: Metaphor, gender, and depression. Metaphor and Symbol 27(3). 199–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danforth, Scot & Taehyung Kim. 2008. Tracing the metaphors of ADHD: A preliminary analysis with implications for inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education 12(1). 49–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deignan, Alice. 1995. English guides 7: Metaphor. Helping learners with real English. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Corpus-based research into metaphor. In Lynne Cameron & Graham Low (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor, 177–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. From linguistic to conceptual metaphors. In Elena Semino & Zsofia Demjén (eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language, 102–116. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 2005[1649]. Las pasiones del alma. Madrid: Edaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise. 2013. Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. On prepositions and particles: a case for lexical representation in systemic functional linguistics. Word 63(2). 115–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1998. On the grammar of pain. Functions of Language 5(1). 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. with Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar (3rd edition). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2004. Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1992. Multiple Selves: the metaphorical models of the self-inherent in our conceptual system. Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from [URL] (14 March, 2024)
Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arús-Hita & Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla. 2010. Systemic Functional Grammar of Spanish. A contrastive study with English. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1999. The system of TRANSITIVITY: An exploratory study of text-based profiles. Functions of Language 6(1). 1–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mueller, Anna, Anselm Fuermaier, Janneke Koerts & Lara Tucha. 2012. Stigma in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. ADHD: Attention Deficit & Hyperactivity Disorders 4(3). 101–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Mick. 2019. Continuing issues in SFL. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Boucher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 204–229. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard. 2019. SFL and critical discourse analysis. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy. L. Boucher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 462–484. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1). 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rafalovich, Adam. 2001. Disciplining domesticity: Framing the ADHD parent and child. The Sociological Quarterly 42(3). 373–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 2003. Lexical metaphor and interpersonal meaning. In Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Miriam Taverners & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics, 223–255. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Still, George. F. 2006. Some abnormal psychical conditions in children: Excerpts from three lectures. Journal of Attention Disorders 10(2). 126–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam. 2019. Semantics. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy. L. Boucher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 55–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Mark & George Lakoff. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, Janet S. Daniel Coleman, Junghee Lee, Peter N. Squire & Barbara J. Friesen. 2008. Children’s stigmatization of childhood depression and ADHD: Magnitude and demographic variation in a national sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 47(8). 912–920. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiener, Judith, Molly Malone, Angela Varma, Clarisa Markel, Daniella Biondic, Rosemary Tannock & Tom Humphries. 2012. Children’s perceptions of their ADHD symptoms: Positive illusions, attributions, and stigma. Canadian Journal of School Psychology 27(3). 217–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue