Article published In: Moving towards Peace, Compassion and Empathy through Semiotic Enquiry: Special issue of the Journal Language, Context and Text 6:1 (2024)
Edited by Elizabeth A. Thomson, Awni Etaywe, Ingrid Wijeyewardene and Penny Wheeler
[Language, Context and Text 6:1] 2024
► pp. 2–26
Moving towards peace, compassion and empathy through semiotic enquiry
Published online: 20 August 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00063.eta
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00063.eta
Abstract
In our interconnected world, exposure to hate, fear, violence and adversarial communication is commonplace. Yet,
this exposure underscores the urgent need for a more just, peaceful, and inclusive society. While research stresses the importance
of nurturing peace, compassion and empathy for enhanced well-being and social justice, these three terms are rarely discussed at
length in linguistics and communication studies. Little systematic work explores how language and semiotic resources actualise
these ideals across contexts. This special issue, grounded in systemic functional linguistics, addresses this gap. It aims to
contribute to a more just world, promote non-violent efforts for social justice, and lay the foundation for future research on the
semiotics of peace, compassion and empathy. This paper outlines key definitions and contributions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Defining “peace”, “compassion” and “empathy” in the special issue
- Macquarie dictionary (2nd edition)
- 3.Overview of the articles in the special issue
- 4.Final remarks
References
References (63)
Bandura, Albert. 2016. Moral
disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. New York: Worth Publishers.
Bartlett, Tom. 2012. Hybrid
voices and collaborative change: Contextualising positive discourse analysis. London & New York: Routledge.
. 2018. Positive
discourse analysis. In John Flowerdew & John E. Richardson (eds.), The
Routledge handbook of critical discourse
studies, 133–147. London & New York: Routledge.
Chouliaraki, Lilie & Norman Fairclough. 1999. Discourse
in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse
analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Clyne, Michael. 1987. The
role of linguistics in peace and conflict studies. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
Series
S 10(1). 76–97.
Connors, Joanie. 2016. Peace
studies glossary. Global campaign for peace education. [URL] (22
August 2022)
Curtin, Deane. 2022. Compassion
and being human. In Carol J. Adams & Lori Gruen (eds.), Ecofeminism:
Feminist intersections with other animals and the
earth, 69–87. London: Bloomsbury.
Dowling, Trisha. 2018. Compassion
does not fatigue! The Canadian Veterinary
Journal 59(7). 749–750. [URL]
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna. 2023. The
role of social affiliation in incitement: A social semiotic approach to far-right terrorists’ incitement to
violence. Language in
Society 1–26.
Ferguson, R. Brian. 2008. Ten points on
war. Social Analysis: The International Journal of
Anthropology 52(2). 32–49. [URL].
Fourie, Pieter Jacobus. 2012. Peace
journalism as ideology or peace journalism as a semiotic act of world and life
view? Communicare 311(Special
Edition). 1–22.
Friedrich, Patricia. 2007. English
for peace: Toward a framework of peace sociolinguistics. World
Englishes 26(1). 72–83.
Galtung, Johan. 1969. Violence,
peace and peace research. Journal of Peace
Research 6(3). 167–191. [URL].
Gomes de Matos, Francisco. 2000. Harmonizing
and humanizing political discourse: The contribution of peace linguistics. Peace and Conflict
Studies: Journal of Peace
Psychology 6(4). 339–344.
Gruen, Lori. 2015. Entangled
empathy: An alternative ethic for our relationships with animals. New York: Lantern Books.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language
as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and
meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
1985. Systemic
background. In James D. Benson & William S. Greaves (eds.), Systemic
perspectives on
discourse, vol. 11, 1–15. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
2008. Working
with meaning: Towards an appliable linguistics. In Jonathan Webster (ed.), Meaning
in context: Implementing intelligent applications of language
studies, 7–23. London: Bloomsbury.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s
introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985. Language,
context, and text. Burwood: Deakin University Press.
Hanh, Thich Nhat. 2008[2003]. Spiritual reflections
on war and peace: A talk by Thich Nhat Hanh – Peace Forum, March 19, 2003. Human Architecture:
Journal of Sociology of
Self-Knowledge 6(3). 7–14.
Harré, Rom. 2012. Positioning
theory: Moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology. In Jaan Valsiner (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of culture and
psychology, 191–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hodges, Adam. 2013. War,
discourse, and peace. In Adam Hodges (ed.), Discourses
of war and
peace, 3–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Höijer, Brigitta. 2003. The
discourse of global compassion and the media. Nordicom
Review 24(2). 19–29.
Höijer, Birgitta. 2004. The discourse of global compassion: The audience and media reporting of human suffering. Media, Culture & Society 26(4). 513–531.
Hughes, Jessica. 2018. Progressing
positive discourse analysis and/in critical discourse studies: Reconstructing resistance through progressive discourse
analysis. Review of
Communication 18(3). 193–211.
Janks, Hilary & Roz Ivanič. 1992. CLA
and emancipatory discourse. In Norman Fairclough (ed.), Critical
language awareness, 305–331. Abingdon and New York: Taylor and Francis.
Kress, Gunther. 2000. Design
and social transformation: New theories of meaning. In Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis (eds.), Multiliteracies:
Literacy learning and the design of social
futures, 153–161. London & New York: Routledge.
Kruger, Frans. 2012. The
role of TESOL in educating for peace. Journal of Peace
Education 9(1). 17–30.
Lewis, Charlton T. & Charles Short. 1879. A
Latin dictionary founded on Andrews’ edition of Freund’s Latin dictionary revised and
rewritten. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Perseus Digital Library. [URL] (15 October, 2023).
Martin, J. R. 2012[2000]. Close
reading: Functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse
analysis. In J. R. Martin, CDA/PDA,
volume 6 in the collected works of J.R.
Martin, 158–184. Edited by Wang Zhenhua. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
2012[2004]. Positive
discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. In J. R. Martin, CDA/PDA,
volume 6 in the collected works of J.R.
Martin, 278–298. Edited by Wang Zhenhua. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
2012. CDA/PDA,
volume 6 in the collected works of J.R. Martin. Edited by Wang Zhenhua. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
Martin, J. R. & Peter White. 2005. The
language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martin, J. R. & Pam Peters. 1985. On
the analysis of exposition. In Ruqaiya Hasan (ed.), Discourse
on discourse: Workshop reports from the Macquarie Workshop on Discourse Analysis. Applied Linguistics Association of Australia (Occasional Papers
7). 61–92. [reprinted in Text
Analysis 2012. 6–45]
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2012. Systemic
functional linguistics and appliable linguistics: Social accountability and critical
approaches. DELTA. Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e
Aplicada 28(Especial). 435–471.
Narasimhananda, Swami. 2018. What
does SHANTI mean. [URL] (16 June, 2023)
Oxford, Rebecca L. 2013. The language of peace: Communicating to
create harmony. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
Peace23. [URL] (7 October,
2023)
Rosenberg, Marshall. 2015. Nonviolent
communication: A language of life (3rd
edition). Encinitas: Puddle Dancer Press.
Rothbart, Daniel & Susan Allen. 2019. Building
peace through systemic compassion. Conflict Resolution
Quarterly 361. 373–386.
Sapio, Antonella & Adriano Zamperini. 2007. Peace
psychology: Theory and practice. In Charles Webel & Johan Galtung (eds.), Handbook
of peace and conflict
studies, 265–278. London: Routledge.
Schmidsberger, Florian & Henriette Löffler-Stastka. 2018. Empathy
is proprioceptive: The bodily fundament of empathy – a philosophical contribution to medical
education. BMC Medical
Education 18(1). 69–76.
Semiotics of Peace, Compassion and Empathy
SIG. n.d. Australian Systemic Functional Linguistics
Association [URL] (1 October
2023).
Standish, Katerina, Heather Devere, Adan E. Suazo, & Rachel Rafferty. 2021. Defining
the platform of positive peace. In Katerina Standish, Heather Devere, Adan E. Suazo, & Rachel Rafferty (eds.), The
Palgrave handbook of positive
peace, 3–24. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Trester, Anna Marie. 2013. Performing peace: The
framing of silence in a Quaker vigil. In Adam Hodges (ed.), Discourses
of war and
peace, 225–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Langenhove, Luk. 2017. Varieties of moral orders and
the dual structure of society: A perspective from positioning theory. Frontiers in
Sociology, 21(2017). 1–9.
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse
and practice: New tools for critical
analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Watson, Olivia. 2012. The
language of clinical empathy: Modelling affiliation in doctor-patient communication. The University of Sydney, Australia: BA (Hons.) dissertation. The University of Sydney, Australia.
Webel, Charles & Johan Galtung (eds.). 2007. Handbook
of peace and conflict
studies. London: Routledge.
Wenden, Anita L. 2007. Educating for a critically
literate civil society: Incorporating the linguistic perspective into peace education. Journal
of Peace
Education 4(2). 163–180.
Wescott, Roger W. 1990. Reflections on the etymology of
some words for “peace”. International Journal on World
Peace 7(3). 94–97. [URL]
Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer. 2009. Critical
discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods
of critical discourse analysis (2nd edition). Los Angeles: Sage.
Zayas, Alfred de. 20 February, 2015. Social
justice fosters peace, peace enables social justice. [URL] (6 October 2023).
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
