Article published In: Language, Context and Text
Vol. 5:1 (2023) ► pp.49–79
A comparative study of nominal group systems and structures between Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese
Published online: 26 May 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00049.wan
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00049.wan
Abstract
This paper presents a text-based comparative study of the
construal of entities through nominal groups in Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin
Chinese. It approaches the grammatical description of nominal groups from the
ideational and textual perspectives, and gives priority to the perspective “from
above”, taking as point of departure the discourse semantic systems of
ideation and identification. From the perspective of
ideation, the comparison focuses on the classification, description
and quantification of entities. From the perspective of identification,
the comparison focuses on the presentation or presumption of entities in
discourse, and the determination and qualification of them. In terms of
grammatical realisations, the nucleus function of a nominal group, Thing, enters
into multivariate structures with a range of pre- and post-Thing functions.
However, configuration and realisation of the functions are language-specific.
This study makes explicit structural consequences of systemic choices in nominal
group grammar, and attends to the problem of structural markers, drawing on the
notion of “subjacency” structure proposed in Martin, J. R., Y. J. Doran & Dongbing Zhang. 2021. Nominal
group grammar: System and
structure. Word 67 (3). 248–280. and Martin and Doran (this issue).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical dimensions
- 3.Data
- 4.Nominal group systems and structures
- 4.1Clause and nominal group
- 4.2The ideational perspective
- 4.2.1The Thing function realised by a common noun
- 4.2.2The classification system
- 4.2.3The epithesis system
- 4.2.4The quantification system
- 4.3The textual perspective
- 4.3.1The Thing function realised by proper noun and pronoun
- 4.3.2The determination system
- 4.3.3The qualification system
- 4.4Structural configurations
- 4.5Function Marking in Lhasa Tibetan
- 5.Concluding remarks
- Notes
- Abbreviations for traditional grammatical terms
References
References (27)
Doran, Y. J., J. R. Martin & Dongbing Zhang (eds.). 2021a. The
grammar of nominal groups: Systemic functional linguistic perspectives
(Special Issue on the nominal group, Part
1). Word 67 (3).
(eds.). 2021b. The
grammar of nominal groups: Systemic functional linguistic perspectives
(Special Issue on the nominal group, Part
2a). Word 67 (4).
(eds.). 2022a. The
grammar of nominal groups: Systemic functional linguistic perspectives
(Special Issue on the nominal group, Part
2b). Word 68 (1).
(eds.). 2022b. The
grammar of nominal groups: Systemic functional linguistic perspectives
(Special Issues on the nominal group, Part
3). Word 68 (2).
2003. Word
order in Sino-Tibetan languages from a typological and geographical
perspective. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The
Sino-Tibetan
languages, 43–55. London & New York: Routledge.
Fang, Jing. 2022. A systemic functional grammar of Chinese nominal groups: A text-based approach. Singapore: Springer.
Fang, Mei. 2002. Zhǐshìcí zhè hé nà zài Běijīng huà zhōng de yǔfǎhuà (Grammaticalisation of zhè and nà in Beijing vernacular). Zhōngguó Yǔwén (Studies of the Chinese Language) 41. 343–356.
Fontaine, Lise. 2017. The
English nominal group: The centrality of the Thing
element. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The
Routledge handbook of systemic functional
linguistics, 267–283. London & New York: Routledge.
Fontaine, Lise & David Schönthal. 2019. The
rooms of the house: Grammar at group
rank. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schöntahl (eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of systemic functional
linguistics, 118–141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966[1963]. Some
universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful
elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals
of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hahn, Michael. 1996. Lehrbuch
der klassischen tibetischen
Schriftsprache. Swisttal-Odendorf: Indica et Tibetica Verlag.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1992. Systemic
grammar and the concept of a ‘science of
language’. Wàiguóyǔ (Journal of
Foreign
Languages) 21. 1–9.
1996. On
grammar and
grammatics. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David Butt (eds.), Functional
descriptions: Theory in
practice, 1–38. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K. with Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s
introduction to functional grammar (4th
edition). London & New York: Routledge.
Hao, Jing & Pin Wang. 2022. Chinese
nominal groups: The metaphorical realization of
figures. Word 68 (2). 109–144.
Jiang, Di. 2016. Zàngyǔ Lāsàhuà yǔfǎ biāozhù
wénběn (Grammatically
glossed texts of the Lhasa dialect of
Tibetan). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
Kim, Mira, J. R. Martin, Gi-Hyun Shin & Gyung Hee Choi. 2023. Korean
grammar: A systemic functional
approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, Eden Sum-hung. 2017. The
nominal group in
Chinese. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The
Routledge handbook of systemic functional
linguistics, 338–353. London & New York: Routledge.
Martin, J. R. 1992. English
text: System and structure. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Martin, J. R. & David Rose. 2007. Working
with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd
edition). London & New York: Continuum.
Martin, J. R. & Gi-Hyun Shin. 2021. Korean
nominal groups: System and
structure. Word 67 (3). 387–429.
Martin, J. R., Pin Wang & Yongsheng Zhu. 2013. Systemic
functional grammar: A next step into the theory – axial
relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Martin, J. R., Y. J. Doran & Dongbing Zhang. 2021. Nominal
group grammar: System and
structure. Word 67 (3). 248–280.
McDonald, Edward. 2017. Form
and function in
groups. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The
Routledge handbook of systemic functional
linguistics, 251–266. London & New York: Routledge.
