Cover not available

Reply published In: Language, Context and Text
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp.393400

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (20)
References
Athanasopoulos, Panos & Emanuel Bylund. 2013. Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science 37 (2). 286–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloor, Thomas & Meriel Bloor. 2004. The functional analysis of English, (2nd edition) London: Hodder Arnold. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera. 2001. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43 (1). 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul & Christina Schäffner. 2002. Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In Paul Chilton & Christina Schäffner (eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytical approaches to political discourse, 1–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Marquez, Monica, Iren Mittelberg, Seana Coulson & Michael J. Spivey (eds.) 2007. Methods in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2002. How do you mean? On grammar, volume 1 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 352–368. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, (3rd edition) London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. (4th edition). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2014. Discourse, grammar and ideology: Functional and cognitive perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matlock, Teenie & Winter Bodo. 2015. Experimental semantics. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, (2nd edition), 771–790. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Origgi, Gloria & Dan Sperber. 2000. Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. In Peter Carruthers & Andrew Chamberlain (eds.), Evolution and the human mind: Modularity, language and meta-cognition, 140–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papafragou, Anna, Massey, Christine & Gleitman, Lila. 2002. Shake, rattle ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 84 (2). 189–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papafragou, Anna & Stathis Selimis. 2010. Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion. Language and Cognitive Processes 25 (2). 224–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2004. Introducing functional grammar. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue