Article published In: Language, Context and Text
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp.313–340
Covert modernist techniques in Australian fiction
A systemic functional reading of Peter Carey’s American dreams
Published online: 22 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00013.til
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00013.til
Abstract
Peter Carey’s short story American dreams (Carey, Peter. 1994 [1974]. The fat man in history. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.) presents a recalibration of consciousness as a small Australian town gradually becomes Americanized. The text
foregrounds epistemological concerns by demonstrating a clear tendency toward delayed understanding. For this reason, I argue that
the story is an instance of modernist fiction: a label not previously applied to Carey’s stories. In contrast with popular
modernist techniques such as free indirect discourse and stream of consciousness, the techniques presented in the text appear to
be covert, which may at least partially explain why the story has managed to avoid being labelled modernist by literary critics
until now. Using analytical tools grounded in systemic functional grammar and appraisal categories, I demonstrate how linguistic
analysis can lay bare the covert modernist techniques at work in the story, indicating that such an approach can be a useful
complement to non-linguistic literary criticism.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Modernist fiction and linguistic analysis
- 3. American dreams and literary classification
- 4.Plot synopsis
- 5.Delayed understanding through thematic structure
- 6.Delayed understanding through process types
- 7.Delayed understanding through lexis
- 8.Developmental editing and its effect on the text
- 9.Delayed understanding in the context of Australian modernism
- 10.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (37)
Adami, Valentina. 2009. The role of the reader in Peter Carey’s and Frank Moorehouse’s 1970s short stories. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies 20(2). 177–184.
Ahearne, Kate, Stephen Williams & Kevin Brophy. 1980. An interview with Peter Carey. Going Down Swinging 11. 43–55.
Bell, Philip & Roger Bell. 1993. Implicated: The United States in Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
. 1998. Introduction: The dilemmas of ‘Americanisation’. In Philip Bell & Roger Bell (eds.), Americanization and Australia, 1–14. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Carter, David. 1984. Modernism and Australian literature. World Literature Written in English 24(1). 158–169.
Cohen, Jacob. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1). 37–46.
Cohn, Dorrit. 1978. Transparent minds: Narrative modes for presenting consciousness in fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fleiss, Joseph L. 1971. Measuring nominal scale agreement among raters. Philosophical Bulletin 76(5). 378–382.
Fuoli, Matteo. 2015. A step-wise method for annotating appraisal. Functions of Language 25(2). 1–26.
Halliday, Michael. 2003 [1964]. The linguistic study of literary texts. In Jonathan Webster (ed.), Linguistic studies of text and discourse, 7–22. London: Continuum.
. 2003 [1971]. Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors
. In Jonathan Webster (ed.), Linguistic studies of text and discourse, 88–125. London: Continuum.
Halliday, Michael & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). Milton Park: Routledge.
Hassall, Anthony J. 1994. Dancing on hot macadam: Peter Carey’s fiction. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
Head, Dominic. 1992. The modernist short story: A study in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herman, David. 2011. Emergence of mind: Representations of consciousness in narrative discourse in English. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Huisman, Rosemary. 2013. The origins of language and narrative temporalities. In Raji C. Steinback & Claudia Clausius (eds.), Origins and futures: Time inflected and reflected, 49–78. Leiden: Brill.
Jakobson, Roman. 1971 [1935]. The dominant. In Ladislav Matejka & Krystyna Pomorska (eds.), Readings in Russian poetics: Formalist and structuralist views, 82–87. Chicago: Dalkey Archive Press.
Leech, Geoffrey & Michael Short. 1981. Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (1st edition). Essex: Longman.
. 2007. Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd edition). New York: Longman.
Lever, Susan. 1998. Fiction: Innovation and ideology. In Bruce Bennett, Jennifer Strauss & Chris Wallace-Crabbe (eds.), The Oxford literary history of Australia, 308–331. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Lukin, Annabelle & Adriana Pagano. 2016. Inner and outer worlds: Speech and thought presentation in Mansfield’s Bliss
. Journal of Literary Semantics 45(2). 97–116.
Martin, James R. & Peter R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
O’Reilly, Nathaniel. 2002. The voice of the teller: A conversation with Peter Carey. Antipodes 16(2). 164–167.
Ommundsen, Wenche. 1993. Metafictions?: Reflexivity in contemporary texts. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
Rubik, Margarete. 2005. Provocative and unforgettable: Peter Carey’s short fiction: A cognitive approach. European Journal of English Studies 9(2). 169–184.
Schulze, Cornelia. 2005. Peter Carey’s short stories: Trapped in a narrative labyrinth. In Andreas Gaile (ed.), Fabulating beauty: Perspectives on the fiction of Peter Carey, 117–136. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Shiach, Morag. 2012. Beyond autonomy: Political dimensions of modernist novels. In Robert L. Caserio & Clement Hawes (eds.), The Cambridge history of the English novel, 629–644. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
