Article published In: Language, Context and Text
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp.4–38
Context and text in scientific disciplines of English
A social semiotic perspective
Published online: 4 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00002.but
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00002.but
Abstract
As major world languages – Chinese, Spanish and Portuguese, for instance – become the medium of university
networks, it may be the right time to take stock of the influence that English has had over the way the disciplines of humanities
and sciences have been shaped, directed and evaluated, in particular in the second half of the 20th century. This paper is an
attempt to understand some of the textual, linguistic and historical determinants of Disciplinary English (DE) specifically in the
spectrum of technical subjects. DE is now a way of meaning which has become associated with objective authority. From this
association, DE has shaped our disciplinary knowledge and spread across to registers of bureaucratic and political subject matter.
The discussion also considers innovative potential in disciplinary discourses, in particular what Halliday regarded as the
“knight’s move” in text: this is the related, analogical effect of Hasan’s “symbolic
articulation” in verbal art and grammatical metaphor in the language of technical disciplines.
Article outline
- 1.Configurations of meanings for specific cultural tasks
- 2.Textual motivations for the “favoured form” of verbal science: A logogenetic perspective
- 3.Phylogenetic and contextual perspectives
- 4.Context of culture
- 5.Contexts of situation
- 5.1Field
- 5.2Material action
- 5.3Action with symbols
- 5.4“Goal orientation”: short or long term goals; or both; with or without explicit declaration or evidence of the ultimate goals
- 5.5Tenor
- 5.6Mode
- 6.The ontogenetic perspective: the early roots of disciplinary discourse from home to school and to university
- 7.Disciplined imagination: from analogy to meaning potential
References
References (60)
Bacciagaluppi, Guido & Antony Valentini. 2009. Quantum theory at the crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay conference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Banks, David. 2008. The development of scientific writing: Linguistic features and historical context. Sheffield: Equinox.
. 2017. The birth of the academic article: Le Journal des Sçavans and the philosophical transactions 1665–1700. Sheffield: Equinox.
Bell, John. 1993 [1986]. Interview. In Paul C. W. Davies & Julian R. Brown (eds.), The ghost in the atom: A discussion of the mysteries of quantum physics, 45–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berkeley, George. 2002 [1734]. The analyst; Or, a discourse addressed to an infidel mathematician. London: Tonson in the Strand; reprinted by D. Wilkins in 2002.
Brown, Roger, Courtney Cazden & Ursula Bellugi. 1968. The child’s grammar from I to III. In J. P. Hill (ed.), Minnesota symposia on child development, 28–73. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis.
Butt, David G. 2004. How our meanings change: School contexts and semantic evolution. In Geoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin (eds.), The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals, 217–240. London & New York: Continuum.
2008a. Whiteheadian and functional linguistics. In Michael Weber & Will Desmond (eds.), Handbook of Whiteheadian process thought, 21–32. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
2008b. The robustness of realizational systems. In Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), Meaning in context: Implementing intelligent applications of language studies, 59–83. London & New York: Continuum.
Crosby, Alfred W. 1996. The measure of reality: Quantification and western society 1250 – 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darwin, Charles. 1998 [1859]. The origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. New York: The Modern Library.
Deacon, Terrence W. 2012. Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. London & New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Defoe, Daniel. 2003 [1722]. A journal of the plague year. Based on a journal by HF from 1665. England: Penguin Classics.
Dolnick, Edward. 2011. The clockwork universe: Isaac Newton, the royal society, and the birth of the modern world. New York: Harper Collins.
Edelman, Gerald M. 1992. Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.
Edelman, Gerald M. & Giulio Tononi. 2000. A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. USA: Basic Books.
Grand, Edward. 1957 [1950]. The foundations of modern science in the Middle Ages: Their religious, institutional, and intellectual contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grant, Edward. 2007. A history of natural philosophy: From the ancient world to the nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilder, Louisa. 2008. The age of entanglement: When quantum physics was born. New York: Vintage Books Random House.
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1973. Towards a sociological semantics. In Michael A. K. Halliday, Explorations in the functions of language, 64–94. London: Edward Arnold.
2002[1988]. On the ineffability of grammatical categories. In Michael A. K. Halliday, On grammar, volume 1 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.
2004 [1988]. On the language of physical science. In Michael A. K. Halliday, The language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 140–158. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.
2004 [1998]. Things and relations: Regrammaticizing experience as technical knowledge. In Michael A. K. Halliday, The language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 49–101. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin. 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London & Washington DC: Falmer.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.
Halliday, Michael A. K., & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge.
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1999. Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, 219–328. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2005. Language, society and consciousness: volume 1 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
. 2009. Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
. 2011. Language and education: Learning and teaching in society, volume 3 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
. 2011 [1985]. The implications of semantic distance for language in education. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Language and education: Learning and teaching in society, volume 3 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 73–99. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.
Heisenberg, Werner. 1973. Tradition in science: Science and public affairs. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. XXIX 10. 4–11.
Hoenigswald, Henry M. & Linda F. Wiener (eds.). 1987. Biological metaphor and cladistic classification: An interdisciplinary approach. London: Frances Pinter.
Jones, Steve. 2000. Almost like a whale: The origin of species updated. London: Transworld Publishing Ltd.
Kappagoda, Astika K. 2004. Semiosis as the sixth sense: Theorising the unperceived in Ancient Greek. Doctoral Dissertation. Macquarie University.
Kellogg, David J. 2017. Narrative and dialogue in child development: Vygotsky’s pedology in systemic functional perspective. Doctoral Dissertation. Macquarie University
Klemperer, Victor. 2002 [1957]. The language of the Third Reich. LTI – Lingua Tertii Imperii: A philologist’s notebook. Translated by. Martin Brady. London & New York: Continuum.
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 1990. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Geelong: Deakin University Press
Lamb, Sydney M. 1984. Semiotics of language and culture: A relational approach. In Robin P. Fawcett, Michael A. K. Halliday, Sydney M. Lamb & Adam Makkai (eds.), The semiotics of culture and language, volume 2: Language and other semiotic systems of culture, 71–99. London: Bloomsbury.
Lewontin, Richard C. 2000. It ain’t necessarily so: The case of the human genome and other illusions. New York: New York Review of Books.
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2002. The ambitions of curiosity: Understanding the world in ancient Greece and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, James R. & Robert Veel (eds.). 1998. Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.
O’Toole, Michael. 2011 [1994]. The language of displayed art (2nd edition). Oxford & New York: Routledge.
Popper, Karl R. 1972. Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saussure, Ferdinand de (2011). Course in general linguistics. Translated by Wade Baskin. Edited by P. Meisel & H. Saussy. Columbia University Press: New York.
Schrödinger, Erwin. 1944. What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smitwick, Fiann M., Robert Nicholls, Innes C. Cuthill & Jakob Vinther. 2017. Countershading and stripes in the theropod dinosaur sinosauropteryx reveal heterogeneous habitats in the early cretaceous Jehol Biota. Current Biology. 271: 3337–3343.
Toulmin, Stephen. 1961. Foresight and understanding: An enquiry into the aims of science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Whittaker, Martin A. 2006. Einstein, Bohr and the quantum dilemma: From quantum theory to quantum information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
