Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 18:4 (2017) ► pp.647–698
On some mysteries, asymmetries and derivation of potential de construction in Chinese
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 10 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.18.4.04wan
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.18.4.04wan
Abstract
In this paper, some mysteries and asymmetries of the Chinese potential de construction are investigated. It is shown that a morphosytnactic approach is conducive to accounting for these puzzles. First we explore the possibility of taking de and its negative counterpart -bude as functional heads (cf. . 2001. On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantics interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10.21: 129–168. ; Wu, Ching-Huei Teresa. 2004. On de/bu and the syntactic nature of resultative verbal compounding. Language and Linguistics 5.11: 271–329.). It is proposed that bude could be a functional head with the negative potential (i.e. impossible/impermissible) meaning. This could be evidenced by both empirical data and theoretical deduction. It is argued that bu in V-bu-R, which is distinct from the normal pre-verbal negative morpheme bu, is actually bude. This helps to explain why the negative potential meaning is involved in V-bu-R. Meanwhile, V-de/bude and V-de/bu-R are both assumed to be formed through Morphological Merger (cf. . 1988. Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. Theoretical Morphology: Approches in Modern Linguistics, ed. by M. Hammond & M. Noonan, 253–270. San Diego: Academic Press.; Embick, David, & Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32.41: 555–595. , . 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. by Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press., etc.). Meanwhile, we have discussed some asymmetries observed between V-de/bude and V-de/bu-R and some paradigmatic asymmetries between potential V-de construction and its negative potential V-bude construction. It is assumed that these syntactic asymmetries may be due to some morphological operations related to de and bude.
Keywords:
de
,
bude
, syntax-morphology interface, morphological merger
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Some mysteries and asymmetries in potential de construction
- 2.1Adverbial modification
- 2.1.1Manner adverbial restriction
- 2.1.2Manner zenme and question zenme
- 2.1.3Duration/Frequency phrase restriction
- 2.2Imperative form restriction
- 2.3Some asymmetries
- 2.3.1Asymmetries between V-de/bude and V-de/bu-R
- 2.3.1.1Case-assignability of V’s
- 2.3.1.2Double object construction
- 2.3.1.3Movement asymmetries between V-de/bude and V-de/bu-R
- 2.3.2Asymmetries between V-de and V-bude
- 2.3.1Asymmetries between V-de/bude and V-de/bu-R
- 2.1Adverbial modification
- 3.The grammaticalization of de and bude
- 4.
De and bude as functional heads
- 4.1 De as a functional head
- 4.2
Bude as a functional head
- 4.2.1The acquisition problem of V-bu-R
- 4.2.2 Bu(de) and intervention effect
- 4.2.3The counterparts of bude in other dialects
- 4.2.4V-bu-R = V-bude-R
- 5.The derivation of V-de and V-bude
- 5.1The formalization of grammatical change of de and bude
- 5.2V-bude is not derived from V-de
- 5.3The derivation of V-de and V-bude: between morphology and syntax
- 6.The derivation of V-de-R and V-bu-R
- 6.1LF movement analysis in T. Wu (2004)
- 6.2A morphosyntactic approach to V-de/bu-R
- 6.2.1A proposal
- 6.2.2Morphological Merger
- 6.2.3Local Dislocation in the formation of V-de/bu-R
- 7.Puzzles and asymmetries revisited
- 7.1Restrictions revisited
- 7.2Asymmetries revisited
- 8.Conclusion and discussions
- 8.1Conclusion
- 8.2Unsolved problems and discussions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (97)
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Beck, Sigrid. 1996. Wh-constructions and Transparent Logical Form. Tübingen: University of Tübingen dissertation.
. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14.11: 1–56.
Beck, Sigrid, & Shin-Sook Kim. 1997. On wh- and operator scope in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6.41: 339–384.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1995. Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. Cambridge: The MIT dissertation.
. 2002. A-chains at the PF-interface: copies and ‘covert’ movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 201: 197–267.
Chen, Li, Po-lun Lee, & Haihua Pan. 2013. Hanyu foudingci ‘bu’ de jufadiwei [The syntactic status of bu in Mandarin]. Yuyan Kexue [
Linguistic Sciences
] 41: 337–348.
Chen, Qianrui. 2008. Hanyu Timao Yanjiu de Leixingxue Shiye [A Typological View on Aspects in Mandarin Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Cheng, Gong, & Jianguo Xiong. 2014. Zhongguo he dongnanya yu zhong de de zi jiegou [On the de construction in China and other East Asian languages]. Paper presented at Third Symposium on Syntax and Semantics in China, October 18–19, 2014. Xiangtan: Xiangtan University.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, & Rint Sybesma. 2003. Forked modality. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2003, ed. by Leonie M. E. A. Cornips & Paula Fikkert, 13–23. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Chung, Zoey Jui-Yi. 2012. Investigating the syntax of postverbal modals in Hakka. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 10.11: 69–114.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dahl, Östen. 2010. Typology of negation. The Expression of Negation, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, 9–38. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Dong, Xiufang. 2011. Cihuihua: Hanyu Shuangyinci de Yansheng he Fazhan [
Lexicalization: the Origin and Evolution of Chinese Disyllabic Words
] (revised edition). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Embick, David, & Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32.41: 555–595.
. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. by Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ernst, Thomas. 1995. Negation in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13.41: 665–707.
. 2014. Adverbial adjuncts in Mandarin Chinese. The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, 49–72. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fan, Li. 2007. Ertong dui Putonghua zhong foudingci de zaoqi huode [Early child language acquisition of negative words in Mandarin Chinese]. Xiandai Waiyu [
Modern Foreign Languages
] 30.21: 144–154.
Feng, Shengli. 2005. Hanyu Yunlü Yufa Yanjiu [
Studies on Chinese Prosodic Grammar
]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
. 2009. Hanyu de Yunlü, Cifa yu Jufa [
Interactions between Morphology, Syntax and Prosody in Chinese
] (revised edition). Beijing: Peking University Press.
. 2014. Historical syntax of Chinese. The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ed. by C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Andrew Simpson, 537–575. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Gelderen, Elly van. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2011. The Linguistic Cycle Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halle, Morris, & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Harley, Heidi, & Rolf Noyer. 1999. State-of-the-article: distributed morphology. Glot International 4.41: 3–9.
Hu, Jianhua. 2007. Fouding jiaodian yu xiayu [Negation, focus and scope]. Zhongguo Yuwen [
Studies of the Chinese Language
] 21: 99–112.
Hu, Xiaoming. 2010. A New Study on Mandarin Irrealis “V DE/BU X” Construction. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa dissertation.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge: The MIT dissertation.
. 2006. Resultatives and unaccusatives: a parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan 2531: 1–43.
. 2014. On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. Chinese Syntax in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed. by Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson & W.-T. Dylan Tsai, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li, & Yafei Li. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kim, Shin-Sook. 2002. Intervention effects are focus effects. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 101: 615–628.
Ko, Heejeong. 2005. Syntax of why-in-situ: merge into [Spec, CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23.41: 867–916.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, ed. by Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Li, Charles N., & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Li, Haoze, & Chi-Hang Candice Cheung. 2012. Hanyu jidian ganshe xiaoying de jufafenxi [The syntactic analysis of focus intervention effects in Mandarin]. Yuyan Kexue [
Linguisitic Sciences
] 11.21: 113–125.
Li, Liding. 1963[1994]. Dai ‘de’ zi de buyu ju [Sentences with de-complements]. Zhongguo Yuwen 1963.51: 396–410. Also in Li Lingding Zixuanji [
Selected Papers of Lingding Li
], 12–47. Zhengzhou: Henan Educational Press.
Li, Mei. 2007. Xiandai Hanyu Foudingjufa Yanjiu [
Negation in Chinese
]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Languages Education Press.
. 2010. Case and objects. Paper resented in GLOW-in-Asia 8, August 12–14, 2010. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University.
. 2011. Non-canonical objects and case. Korea Journal of Chinese Language and Literature 1.11: 21–51.
Lien, Chinfa. 2011. Interface of modality and tit4 得 constructions in South Min: a case study of their development from earlier Southern Min in the Ming and Qing to Modern Taiwanese Southern Min. Language and Linguistics 12.41: 723–752.
Lin, Jo-wang. 1992. The Syntax of zenmeyang ‘how’ and weishenme ‘why’ in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1.31: 293–331.
Lin, Jo-wang, & Chih-Chen Jane Tang. 1995. Modals as verbs in Chinese: a GB perspective. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica 66.11: 53–105.
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2011. Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax 14.11: 48–73.
. 2012. Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics 48.11: 151–186.
Liu, Na. 2012. On the Syntax, Semantics and Typology of Non-Canonical Passives. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University dissertation.
Lü, Shuxiang. 1990[1944]. Yu dongci hou ‘de’ yu ‘bu’ youguan de cixu wenti [The issue of word order in connection with the post-verbal de and bu
]. Lü Shuxiang Wenji [
Papers by Lü Shuxiang
], Vol. 21, ed. by Shuxiang Lü, 132–144. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
. 1988. Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. Theoretical Morphology: Approches in Modern Linguistics, ed. by M. Hammond & M. Noonan, 253–270. San Diego: Academic Press.
McCloskey, James. 1996. On the Scope of Verb Movement in Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14.11: 47–104.
Mei, Tsu-Lin. 1991. Cong Handai de dong-sha he dong-si lai kan dongbu jiegou de fazhang [A look at the development of the verb-resultative construction from ‘V-kill’ and ‘V-die’ in the Han dynasty]. Yuyanxue Luncong [
Essays on Linguistics
] 161: 112–136.
. 2012. The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 13.11: 1–28.
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English: A Study of Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 31, ed. by Adriana Belletti, 223–251. New York: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Ian G. 1985. Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3.11: 21–58.
Shi, Guanquan. 1985. Guanyu zhuci ‘de’ de jige wenti [Problems in connection with particle de
]. Yufa Yanjiu yu Tansuo [
Researches and Explorations in Chinese Grammar
], ed. by Zhongguo Yuwen Zazhishe [Editorial office of Studies of Chinese Language], Vol. 31, 247–280. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Shibatani, Masayosh. 1985. Passives and Related Constructions: A Prototype Analysis. Language 61.41: 821–848.
Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word-Order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 2006. Strong vs. weak islands. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 41, ed. by Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk, 479–531. Malden: Blackwell.
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 2001. Functional projections and adverbial expressions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 2.21: 203–241.
Tang, Ting-Chi. 1992. Hanyu Cifa Jufa Si [
Studies on Chinese Morphology and Syntax IV
]. Taipei: Student Books.
Thompson, Sandra Annear. 1973. Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin Chinese: a case for lexical rules. Language 49.21: 361–379.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1994. On Economizing the Theory of A-Bar Dependencies. Cambridge: The MIT dissertation.
. 2001. On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantics interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10.21: 129–168.
Wang, Chyan-an Arthur. 2010. The Microparametric Syntax of Resultatives in Chinese Languages. New York: New York University dissertation.
Wang, Chyan- an Arthur. 2011. A New Analysis of Resultatives in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at The Fifth International Conference on Formal Linguistics, December 10–12, 2011. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.
Wang, Changsong. 2014a. Exploring the Interface between Syntax and Morphology – A Case Study of de in Chinese. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University dissertation.
. 2014b. Cong beidongju kan zhe ben shu de chuban
[Looking at passives sentences through zhe ben shu de chuban
]. Language and Linguistics 15.21: 231–264.
Wang, Guosheng. 1998. Kenengshi de ziju de jufa buduicheng xianxiang [On the syntactic asymmetries involved in the potential de construction]. Yuyan Yanjiu [
Studies in Language and Linguistics
] 11: 23–29.
Wei, Pei-chuan. 2004. Jindai Hanyu nengxing dongbu jiegou zhong binyu de weizhi [Object position in verb-complement potential constructions in early Mandarin]. Language and Linguistics 5.31: 663–704.
Williams, Alexander. 2014. Causal VVs in Mandarin. The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ed. by C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Andrew Simpson, 311–341. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Wu, Ching-Huei Teresa. 2004. On de/bu and the syntactic nature of resultative verbal compounding. Language and Linguistics 5.11: 271–329.
Wu, Fuxiang. 2002. Nengxing shubu jiegou suoyi [Some remarks on the potential verb-complement construction in Chinese]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [
Language Teaching and Research
] 51: 19–27.
Wu, Xiu-Zhi Zoe. 2004. Grammaticalization and Language Change in Chinese: A Formal View. London & New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
Xie, Zhiguo. 2012. The modal uses of de and temporal shifting in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21.41: 387–420.
Yang, Barry Chung-Yu. 2008. Intervention Effects and the Covert Component of Grammar. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University dissertation.
Yue, Jun-fa. 1984. “De” zi ju de chansheng he yanbian [On the origin and development of sentences with de]. Yuyan Yanjiu [
Studies in Language and Linguistics
] 21: 10–30.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
