Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 18:1 (2017) ► pp.72–115
Acquisition of Chinese relative clauses by deaf children in Hong Kong
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 12 January 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.18.1.03lam
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.18.1.03lam
This paper is a study of how deaf children in Hong Kong acquire Chinese relative clauses. The relative clause is reported to be a difficult structure for deaf children (Friedmann, Naama, & Ronit Szterman. 2006. Syntactic movement in orally trained children with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11.1:56–75. ). While it may be true for postnominal relative clauses, it is unclear whether prenominal relative clauses are equally difficult for deaf children. This paper explores this question by examining deaf children’s comprehension and production of Chinese relative clauses via an elicited production task, a picture selection task and a dots-connecting task, which are all presented in written format. In addition to deaf children, typically developing Cantonese children and Cantonese adults with high Chinese proficiency are also recruited for comparison. The results show that deaf children fall behind typically developing Cantonese children in production. But deaf children with higher Chinese proficiency can perform similarly with typically developing Cantonese children. The error types and the types of non-RC responses produced by deaf children are also present in the data of typically developing Cantonese children, suggesting that deaf children do not undergo a different pathway in the development of relative clauses. While typically developing Cantonese children demonstrate non-significant subject advantage in production but object advantage in comprehension, deaf children do not demonstrate subject-object asymmetry in production and object advantage in comprehension.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Acquisition of relative clauses
- 1.1.1Typically developing children
- 1.1.2Deaf children
- 1.2Chinese relative clauses
- 1.3Acquisition of Chinese relative clauses
- 1.1Acquisition of relative clauses
- 2.Experiment 1: Elicited production
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Test design and procedures
- 2.3Results
- 2.3.1Adults
-
2.3.2Typically developing Cantonese children
- 2.3.2.1Adult-like RC responses
- 2.3.2.2Non-adult-like RC
- 2.3.2.3Non-RC responses
- 2.3.3Deaf children
- 2.3.3.1RC responses and errors
- 2.3.3.2Subject-object asymmetry?
- 2.3.3.3Non-RC responses
- 3.Experiment 2: Comprehension tests
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Method and test procedures
- 3.3Results
- 3.3.1Adults
- 3.3.2Typically developing Cantonese children
- 3.3.3Deaf children
- 4.Overall results
- 5.Discussion and conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (52)
Adani, Flavia, Heather K. J. van der Lely, Matteo Forgiarini, & Maria Teresa Guasti. 2010. Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: a comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua 1201:2148–2166.
Adani, Flavia. 2011. Re-thinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: towards a grammatically-based account. Journal of Child Language 38.1:141–165.
Arnon, Inbal. 2010. Rethinking child difficulty: the effect of NP type on children’s processing of relative clauses in Hebrew. Journal of Child Language 37.1:27–57.
Arosio, Fabrizio, Flavia Adani, & Maria Teresa Guasti. 2006. Children’s processing of subject and object relatives in Italian. Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2005, ed. by Adriana Belletti, Elisa Bennati, Cristiano Chesi, Elisa Di Domenico & Ida Ferrari, 15–27. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.
. 2009. Grammatical features in the comprehension of Italian relative clauses by children. Merging Features: Computation, Interpretation and Acquisition, ed. by José M. Brucart, Anna Gavarró & Jaume Solà, 138–155. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arosio, Fabrizio, Maria Teresa Guasti, & Natale Stucchi. 2011. Disambiguating information and memory resources in children’s processing of Italian relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 40.2:137–154.
Belletti, Adriana, & Carla Contemori. 2010. Intervention and attraction: on the production of subject and object relatives by Italian (young) children and adults. Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2009, ed. by João Costa, Ana Castro, Maria Lobo & Fernanda Pratas, 39–52. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Berent, Gerald P. 2009. The interlanguage development of deaf and hearing learners of L2 English: Parallelism via minimalism. The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, ed. by William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia, 523–543. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Booth, James R., Brian MacWhinney, & Yasuaki Harasaki. 2000. Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development 71.4:981–1003.
Brandt, Silke, Evan Kidd, Elena Lieven, & Michael Tomasello. 2009. The discourse bases of relativization: an investigation of young German and English-speaking children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Cognitive Linguistics 20.3:539–570.
Chan, Angel, Stephen Matthews, & Virginia Yip. 2011. The acquisition of relative clauses in Cantonese and Mandarin. The Acquisition of Relative Clauses: Processing, Typology and Function, ed. by Evan Kidd, 197–226. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Chang, Hsing-Wu. 1984. The comprehension of complex Chinese sentences by children: relative clause. Chinese Journal of Psychology 261:57–66.
Cheng, Sherry Ya-Yin. 1995. The Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Chinese. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University MA thesis (Unpublished).
Chiu, Bonnie Hui-Chun. 1996. The Nature of Relative Clauses in Chinese-speaking Children (NSC Research Report). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
Contemori, Carla, & Adriana Belletti. 2014. Relatives and passive object relatives in Italian-speaking children and adults: intervention in production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics 351:1021–1053.
de Villiers, Jill, Peter A. de Villiers, & Esme Hoban. 1994. The central problem of functional categories in the English syntax of oral deaf children. Constraints on Language Acquisition: Studies of Atypical Children, ed. by Helen Tager-Flusberg, 9–47. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
de Villiers, Peter A. 1988. Assessing English syntax in hearing-impaired children: Eliciting production in pragmatically-motivated situations. Communication Assessment of Hearing-impaired Children: From Conversation to Classroom. Monograph Supplement, ed. by Richard R. Kretschmer, Jr. & Laura W. Kretschmer, 41–71. Mt. Pleasant: Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology.
Diessel, Holger, & Michael Tomasello. 2005. A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language 81.4:882–906.
Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti, & Luigi Rizzi. 2009. Relativized relatives: types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119.1:67–88.
Friedmann, Naama, & João Costa. 2011. Last resort and no resort: Resumptive pronouns in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic hearing impairment. Resumptive Pronouns at the Interfaces, ed. by Alain Rouveret, 223–240. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Friedmann, Naama, & Rama Novogrodsky. 2004. The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: a study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 31.3:661–681.
Friedmann, Naama, & Ronit Szterman. 2006. Syntactic movement in orally trained children with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11.1:56–75.
Friedmann, Naama, Rama Novogrodsky, Ronit Szterman, & Omer Preminger. 2008. Resumptive pronouns as a last resort when movement is impaired: relative clauses in hearing impairment. Current Issues in Generative Hebrew Linguistics, ed. by Sharon Armon-Lotem, Gabi Danon & Susan D. Rothstein, 267–290. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Friedmann, Naama, Ronit Szterman, & Manar Haddad-Hanna. 2010. The comprehension of relative clauses and Wh questions in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic hearing impairment. Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2009, ed. by João Costa, Ana Castro, Maria Lobo & Fernanda Pratas, 157–169. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Goodluck, Helen, & Susan Tavakolian. 1982. Competence and processing in children’s grammar of relative clauses. Cognition 11.1:1–27.
Goodluck, Helen, Eithne Guilfoyle & Síle Harrington. 2006. Merge and binding in child relative clauses: the case of Irish. Journal of Linguistics 42.3:629–661.
Guasti, Maria Teresa, & Anna Cardinaletti. 2003. Relative clause formation in Romance child’s production. Probus 15.1:47–89.
Guasti, Maria Teresa, Stavroula Stavrakaki, & Fabrizio Arosio. 2012. Cross-linguistic differences and similarities in the acquisition of relative clauses: evidence from Greek and Italian. Lingua 122.6:700–713.
Hamburger, Henry, & Stephen Crain. 1982. Relative acquisition. Language Development: Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 11, ed. by Stan A. Kuczaj, 245–274. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
He, Yuanjian. 2001. A modified relative-clause stranding analysis for Chinese relative construction. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, Vol. 21, ed. by Haihua Pan, 59–90. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
Hsu, Chun-chieh Natalie, Gabriella Hermon, & Andrea Zukowski. 2009. Young children’s production of head-final relative clauses: elicited production data from Chinese children. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 181:323–360.
Hu, Shenai, Anna Gavarró, Mirta Vernice, & Maria Teresa Guasti. 2016. The acquisition of Chinese relative clauses: contrasting two theoretical approaches. Journal of Child Language 43.1:1–21.
Isobe, Miwa. 2003. Head-internal relative clauses in child Japanese. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD), ed. by Barbara Beachley, Amanda Brown & Frances Conlin, 358–369. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
. 2005. Language Variation and Child Language Acquisition: Laying Ground for Evaluating Parametric Proposals. Tokyo: Keio University dissertation.
Keenan, Edward L., & Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8.1:63–99.
Labelle, Marie. 1990. Predication, wh-movement, and the development of relative clauses. Language Acquisition 1.1:95–119.
. 1996. The acquisition of relative clauses: Movement or no movement? Language Acquisition 5.2:65–82.
Lee, Thomas Hun-tak. 1992. The inadequacy of processing heuristics: evidence from relative clause acquisition in Mandarin Chinese. Research on Chinese Linguistics in Hong Kong, ed. by Thomas Hun-tak Lee, 47–85. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
Li, Charles N., & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Lillo-Martin, Diane C., Vicki L. Hanson, & Suzanne T. Smith. 1992. Deaf readers’ comprehension of relative clause structures. Applied Psycholinguistics 13.1:13–30.
Ning, Chunyan, & Haiyun Liu. 2009. Milestones in the acquisition of Mandarin Chinese based on HUCOLA. Paper presented at the Milestones in the First Language Acquisition of Chinese, December 29–30, 2009. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Ozeki, Hiromi, & Yasuhiro Shirai. 2007. Does the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy predict the difficulty order in the acquisition of Japanese relative clauses? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29.2:169–196.
Quigley, Stephen P., Ronnie B. Wilbur, Desmond J. Power, Dale S. Montanelli, & Marjorie W. Steinkamp. 1976. Syntactic Structures in the Language of Deaf Children, Final Report. Urbana: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
Sheldon, Amy. 1974. The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13.3:272–281.
Stavrakaki, Stavroula. 2001. Comprehension of reversible relative clauses in specifically language impaired and normally developing Greek children. Brain and Language 77.3:419–431.
. 2002. Eliciting relative clauses from specifically language impaired and normally developing children. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 395–411. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Su, Yi-ching. 2004. Relatives of Mandarin children. Paper presented at the 2004 Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition in North America. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
Tang, Ting-Chi. 1979. Guoyu Yufa Yanjiu Lunji [Studies in Chinese Syntax]. Taipei: Student Book Company.
Tavakolian, Susan L. 1981. The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses. Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, ed. by Susan L. Tavakolian, 167–187. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Varlokosta, Spyridoula. 1997. The acquisition of relative values in modern Greek: a movement account. Proceedings of the Gala 97 Conference on Language Acquisition, ed. by Antonella Sorace, Caroline Heycock & Richard Shillcock, 184–187. Edinburgh: Human Communication Research Center, University of Edinburgh.
