Cover not available

Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 18:1 (2017) ► pp.1–25

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Japanese wh-phrases as operators with unspecified quantificational force

 |  | 
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 12 January 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.18.1.01sai
Abstract
Japanese wh-expressions appear in various kinds of operator-variable structures, including wh-questions and sentences with universal and existential quantification. The nature of the operator-variable relation is determined by an associated particle, such as the question marker ka or the universal particle mo. Given this, it has been widely assumed since Kuroda, S.-Y. 1965. Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. Cambridge: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar that the wh-expressions are to be interpreted as variables bound by those quantificational particles. This paper argues against this prevailing view by proposing that these wh-expressions are operators with unspecified quantificational force. Building on an insight by Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1990. Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, I argue that they must covertly move to positions that allow them to probe particles and to acquire specific quantificational forces from them. I demonstrate that this analysis captures the main properties of Japanese wh-expressions as well as the differences between them and their Chinese counterparts. Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar proposed a covert movement analysis for argument wh-phrases in Chinese, which was extended to Japanese, for example, in Lasnik, Howard, & Mamoru Saito. 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15.2:235–289.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar and Richards, Norvin. 2001. Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar. But Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1999. On lexical courtesy. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8.1:39–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar has convincingly shown that they are subject to unselective binding and are interpreted in situ as variables. If the analysis for Japanese in this paper is correct, it shows that Huang’s approach can be – and should be – maintained for wh-phrases in Japanese with some refinements.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Nishigauchi’s (1990) unselective binding analysis
  • 3.Alternatives with null operator movement and particle movement
    • 3.1 Tsai’s (1999) comparative syntax of wh-questions in Chinese and Japanese
    • 3.2 Takahashi’s (2002) particle movement analysis
  • 4.Valuation of operator feature with covert movement
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (26)
References
Aoun, Joseph, & Yen-Hui Audrey Li. 1993. On some differences between Chinese and Japanese wh-elements. Linguistic Inquiry 24.2:365–372.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2007. On the locality and motivation of move and agree: an even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry 38.4:589–644. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory Norman. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 1301:33–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagstrom, Paul Alan. 1998. Decomposing Questions. Cambridge: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene Roswitha. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1965. Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. Cambridge: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard, & Mamoru Saito. 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15.2:235–289.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maki, Hideki. 1995. The Syntax of Particles. Storrs: University of Connecticut dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murasugi, Keiko. 1991. Noun Phrases in Japanese: A Study in Syntax, Learnability, and Acquisition. Storrs: University of Connecticut dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1990. Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Construing wh . Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by C.-T. James Huang & Robert May, 197–231. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 2001. Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2010. On some properties of criterial freezing. The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators, ed. by E. Phoevos Panagiotidis, 17–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru. 2014. Case and labeling in a language without φ-feature agreement. On Peripheries: Exploring Clause Initial and Clause Final Positions, ed. by Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque & Yoshio Endo, 269–297. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shimoyama, Junko. 2001. Wh-constructions in Japanese. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Indeterminate pronouns. The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, ed. by Shigeru Miyagawa & Mamoru Saito, 372–393. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takahashi, Daiko. 2002. Determiner raising and scope shift. Linguistic Inquiry 33.4:575–615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takita, Kensuke, & Barry Chung-Yu Yang. 2014. On multiple wh-questions with ‘why’ in Japanese and Chinese. Japanese Syntax in Comparative Perspective, ed. by Mamoru Saito, 206–227. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1999. On lexical courtesy. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8.1:39–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1.3:255–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Kimura, Takayuki & Shigenori Wakabayashi
2024. UG-as-Guide in selection and reassembly of an uninterpretable feature in L2 acquisition of wh-questions. In Current Perspectives on Generative SLA – Processing, Influence, and Interfaces [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 70], ► pp. 316 ff. DOI logo
Maeda, Masako & Yoichi Miyamoto
2024. Bare Wh-stripping in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 33:4 ► pp. 533 ff. DOI logo
Oda, Hiromune
2024. Large-scale pied-piping in the labeling theory and conditions on weak heads. The Linguistic Review 41:1 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Takahashi, Masahiko
2021. Reconsidering the Optionality of Raising in Japanese Exceptional‐Case‐Marking Constructions. Syntax 24:2 ► pp. 224 ff. DOI logo
Chung, Daeho & Myung-Kwan Park
2019. The Nature of Indeterminate Expressions in Chinese and Korean: Focused on Wh-phrases in Conditionals. Lanaguage Research 55:3 ► pp. 497 ff. DOI logo
박명관 & 권준혁
2018. Wh-licensing in Korean/Japanese, Chinese, and English. The Journal of Studies in Language 34:3 ► pp. 475 ff. DOI logo
Manabu Mizuguchi
2017. Labelability and Interpretability. Studies in Generative Grammar 27:2 ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Mizuguchi, Manabu
2019. Ambiguous Labeling and Full Interpretation. Studia Linguistica 73:3 ► pp. 563 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue