Cover not available

Article In: Language and Linguistics: Online-First Articles

On the absence of exceptionally optional negative concord in Turkish

ORCiD logo with link | İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
It has been proposed in recent theoretical analyses that there are at least two types of Negative Concord Items (NCIs henceforth) in Turkish. According to this view, the first type includes typical NCIs such as hiç kimse ‘no one/anyone’, hiçbir şey ‘nothing/anything’ and asla ‘never’ that require the presence of sentential negation -mA in the structure at all times. These elements were shown to exhibit strict Negative Concord (NC) behavior and were semantically classified as generalized quantifiers. On the other hand, the second type of NCIs was claimed to involve such elements as the negative coordinator ne…ne… ‘neither…nor…’ that was argued to display exceptionally optional negative concord. The reason for this claim is that ne…ne… has various characteristics in terms of its meaning that are observed in various syntactic environments. More specifically, it was proposed that it can optionally co-occur with sentential negation, and therefore exhibits exceptionally optional negative concord in the language. In this paper, I shall demonstrate, however, that ne…ne… is in fact not an NCI and it is a linguistic element that has its own negative semantics. Specifically, it does not need the presence of negation regardless of whether negation appears overtly or covertly in the structure. In other words, ne…ne… does not actually appear in NC environments and the presence of sentential negation along with the coordinator is due to reasons orthogonal to its inherent characteristics. In that sense, the account proposed here is in line with those analyses where the co-occurrence of sentential negation along with the negative coordinator is accounted for through other phenomena.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1An unexpected interpretation
  • 2.Previous work
  • 3.Arguments against (optional) negative concord
  • 4.A new semantic account
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • List of abbreviations
  • References
References (44)
References
Biberauer, Theresa & Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2012. Negative concord in Afrikaans: Filling a typological gap. Journal of Semantics 29(3). 345–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corblin, Francis & Déprez, Vivane & de Swart, Henriëtte & Tovena, Lucia. 2004. Negative concord. In Corblin, Francis & de Swart, Henriëtte (eds.), Handbook of French semantics, 417–452. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte. 2010. Expression and interpretation of negation: An OT typology. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Double negation readings. In Déprez, Viviane & Espinal, M. Teresa (eds.), The Oxford handbook of negation, 479–496. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deny, Jean. 1921. Grammaire de la langue turque (dialecte osmanli). Paris: Éditions E. Leroux. (Reprinted in 2012 as Türk Dili Grameri, translated by Elöve, Ali Ulvi. İstanbul: Kabalcı Kitabevi.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa & Tubau, Susagna & Borràs-Comes, Joan & Prieto, Pilar. 2016. Double negation in Catalan and Spanish: Interaction between syntax and prosody. In Larrivée, Pierre & Lee, Chungmin (eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives, 145–176. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fălăuş, Anamaria. 2020. Negation and alternatives: Interaction with focus constituents. In Déprez, Viviane & Espinal, M. Teresa (eds.), The Oxford handbook of negation, 333–348. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fălăuş, Anamaria & Nicolae, Andreea C. 2016. Fragment answers and double negation in strict negative concord languages. In Moroney, Mary & Little, Carol-Rose & Collard, Jacob & Burgdorf, Dan (eds.), SALT 26: Proceedings of the 26th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, 584–600. Austin: University of Texas at Austin. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gajić, Jovana. 2018. Niti — real negative coordination inside a strict negative concord language? In van Alem, Astrid & Ionova, Anastasiia & Pots, Cora (eds.), ConSOLE XXVI: Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the Student Organization of Linguistics in Europe, 1–19. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics (LUCL).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gencan, Tahir Nejat. 1979. Dilbilgisi. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2000. Negative…concord? Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18(3). 457–523. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. N-words and negative concord. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. III1, 327–391. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2017. The landscape of negative dependencies: Negative concord and N-words. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn., vol. IV1, 2099–2136. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Göksel, Aslı. 1987. Distance restrictions on syntactic processes. In Boeschoten, Hendrik E. & Verhoeven, Ludo Th. (eds.), Studies on modern Turkish: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Turkish Linguistics, 69–81. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gračanin-Yüksek, Martina. 2023. Negation that isn’t. Languages 8(4). 1–26. (Article 250.) Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2025. Negindefinites and negative concord: Concepts, terms and analyses. In van der Auwera, Johan & Gianollo, Chiara (eds.), Negative concord: A hundred years on, 53–75. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hendriks, Petra. 2003. “Either” as a focus particle. Groningen: University of Groningen. (Manuscript.) ([URL]) (Accessed 2025-01-14.)
Jäger, Agnes. 2010. Anything is nothing is something: On the diachrony of polarity types of indefinites. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28(4). 787–822. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeretič, Paloma. 2017. Turkish ‘neither…nor’ and optional negative concord. New York: New York University. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Hybrid and optional negative concord in Turkish: A unified analysis. IULC Working Papers 18(2). 1–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Exceptionally optional negative concord with Turkish neither…nor. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 41(3). 1147–1200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamali, Beste. 2017. Negative concord in Turkish polar questions. (Paper presented at the Com(parative) Syn(tax) Meetings, Leiden University, 23 March 2017.)
Kelepir, Meltem. 1999. Scope of negation: Evidence from Turkish NPIs and quantifiers. In Saito, Mamoru & Abe, Yasukai & Aoyagi, Hiroshi & Harimoto, M. & Murasugi, Keiko & Suzuki, Tatsuya (eds.), Proceedings of GLOW in Asia II, 213–230. Nagoya: Center for Linguistics, Nanzan University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Topics in Turkish syntax: Clausal structure and scope. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Kural, Murat. 1993. Scrambling and mixed positions in Turkish. In Broderick, Kimberley (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 221, 259–272. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie & Espinal, M. Teresa. 2014. Diachronic changes in negative expressions: The case of French. Lingua 1451. 194–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Lewis, Geoffrey L. 1967. Turkish grammar. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru & Nishioka, Nobuaki & Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2016. Negative sensitive items and the discourse-configurational nature of Japanese. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1(1). 1–28. (Article no. 33.) Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Vermeulen, Reiko. 2012. Types of focus and their interaction with negation. In Neeleman, Ad & Vermeulen, Reiko (eds.), The syntax of topic, focus, and contrast: An interface-based approach, 227–264. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nişanyan, Sevan. 2025. Nişanyan dictionary. ([URL]) (Accessed 2025-01-20.) (Revised and expanded 7th edition.)
Penka, Doris. 2011. Negative indefinites. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1994. Negative and positive polarity: A binding approach (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Surányi, Balázs. 2006. Quantification and focus in negative concord. Lingua 116(3). 272–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 2018a. Two types of quantifier particles: Quantifier-phrase internal vs. heads on the clausal spine. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 1–32. (Article no. 69.) Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. Strict and non-strict negative concord in Hungarian: A unified analysis. In Bartos, Huba & den Dikken, Marcel & Bánréti, Zoltán & Váradi, Tamás (eds.), Boundaries crossed, at the interfaces of morphosyntax, phonology, pragmatics and semantics, 227–242. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Şener, Serkan. 2007. Cyclic NCI movement. In Bainbridge, Erin & Agbayani, Brian (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL 2006), vol. 171, 407–417. Fresno: California State University, Fresno.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Şener, Serkan & İşsever, Selçuk. 2003. The interaction of negation with focus: Ne…ne… phrases in Turkish. Lingua 113(11). 1089–1117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan. 2021. Quirky negative concord: Croatian, Spanish and French ni’s. Jezikoslovlje 22(2). 195–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2008. Negative concord is syntactic agreement. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. On French negation. In Kwon, Iksoo & Pritchett, Hannah & Spence, Justin (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS35): General session and parasession on negation, 447–458. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Not in the first place. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31(3). 865–900.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue