Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 27:1 (2026) ► pp.134–174
A new form of Chinese passives
Shou-passives
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 15 September 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00249.yan
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00249.yan
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is twofold: (1) to argue that one type of the Mandarin shou construction
can be treated as a new form of passive construction (the shou-passive); and (2) to explore how it differs from the
Chinese bei-passive. In previous studies, the shou construction has been treated as a transitive
structure in which shou ‘receive, endure’ takes an event nominal as its complement. This study reveals that
another type of the shou construction — the shou passive — has emerged, in which
shou takes a verbal complement involving movement. Comparison with bei-passives shows that
the shou-passive can also be divided into two types — short or long passives — while exhibiting two distinct
properties. Shou-passives reject idiom chunk subjects and do not select an Experiencer. These distinctions result
from the lexical composition of shou (i.e., Become and Have/Undergo) and the early stage of grammaticalization,
which requires every component to be projected. The similarities and differences suggest that the grammaticalization of
shou-passives is underway, but not yet completed.
Keywords: Chinese passives, shou, bei, grammaticalization, reanalysis, HAVE
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The history of the shou construction
- 3.Two types of the shou construction
- 3.1Nominal properties of the complement
- 3.2Verbal properties of the complement
- 3.3A nonunified analysis
- 4.The syntax of bei-passives
- 5.The syntax of the shou construction
- 5.1Shou-VP as a Chinese passive construction
- 5.2The lexical components of shou
- 5.3Structures of shou-passives
- 5.4Shou-passives in passivization cartography
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- List of abbreviations
References
References (58)
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2012. Noncanonical passives revisited: parameters of nonactive voice. Linguistics 50(6). 1079–1110.
Askedal, John Ole. 2012. Norwegian få ‘get’: A survey of its uses in present-day Riksmål/Bokmål. Linguistics 50(6). 1289–1331.
Bader, Markus & Häussler, Jana. 2013. How much bekommen is there in the German bekommen passive. In Alexiadou, Artemis & Schäfer, Florian (eds.), Non-canonical passives, 115–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Baker, Mark & Johnson, Kyle & Roberts, Ian. 1989. Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20(2). 219–251.
Bennett, Paul. 1981. The evolution of passive and disposal sentences. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 9(1). 61–90.
Biggs, Alison & Embick, David. 2022. On the event-structural properties of the English get-passive. Linguistic Inquiry 53(2). 211–254.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542.
Chiu, Bonnie. 1995. An object clitic projection in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4(2). 77–117.
Chiu, Liching Livy. 2020. The Chinese gerundive-related “shou-construction” — With special reference to bei-construction. (Paper presented at the 13th Workshop on Formal Syntax and Semantics (FOSS-13), Taipei, 16–17 October 2020).
Comrie, Bernard. 1977. In defense of spontaneous demotion: The impersonal passive. In Cole, Peter & Sadock, Jerrold M. (eds.), Syntax and semantics 8: Grammatical relations, 47–58. New York: Academic Press.
Diedrichsen, Elke. 2012. What you give is what you GET? On reanalysis, semantic extension and functional motivation with the German bekommen-passive construction. Linguistics 50(6). 1163–1204.
Feng, Shengli. 1997. GB-theory and the passive construction in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 11, 1–28.
Fox, Danny & Grodzinsky, Yosef. 1998. Children’s passive: A view from the by-phrase. Linguistic Inquiry 29(2). 311–332.
Harley, Heidi Britton. 1995. Subjects, events, and licensing. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2004. Wanting, having, and getting: A note on Fodor and Lepore 1998. Linguistic Inquiry 35(2). 255–267.
Hartman, Jeremy F. 2012. Varieties of clausal complementation. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Her, One-Soon. 2009. Unifying the long passive and the short passive: On the bei construction in Taiwan Mandarin. Language and Linguistics 10(3). 421–470.
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization volume I: Theoretical and methodological issues (Typological Studies in Language 19), 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1999. Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29(4). 423–509.
. 2013. Variations in non-canonical passives. In Alexiadou, Artemis & Schäfer, Florian (eds.), Non-canonical passives, 97–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2014. Passives forever: Control, raising and implicit arguments. (Paper presented at 10th GLOW in Asia conference, Hsinchu, 24–26 May 2014.)
Huang, C.-T. James & Liu, Na. 2014. A new passive form in Mandarin: Its syntax and implications. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1(1). 1–34.
Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Yen-Hui Audrey & Li, Yafei. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, Shi-Zhe. 2006. Property theory, adjectives, and modification in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15(4). 343–369.
Huang, Shi-Zhe & Jenks, Peter. 2014. Nominal modification in Chinese and Thai. In Santana-LaBarge, Robert E. (ed.), Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 227–237. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Jin, Jingzhe. 2016. “Zao” sentence and “shou” sentence in Modern Chinese. Yanji: Yanbian University. (Master’s thesis.)
Lasnik, Howard & Fiengo, Robert. 1974. Complement object deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 5(4). 535–571.
Li, Yin. 2015. The diachronic development of passive constructions from Archaic Chinese to Modern. Seattle: University of Washington. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Lin, Kang-Ju. 2016. Analysis of the emotional import of shou in Modern Mandarin Chinese and pedagogical suggestions. NTU Working Papers in Chinese Language Teaching 41. 31–66.
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2009. Licensing “gapless” bei passives. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18(2). 167–177.
. 2015. Gapless bei passives licensed by accomplishment events. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 24(2). 193–215.
Liu, Na. 2012. On the syntax, semantics and typology of non-canonical passives. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2016. The structures of Chinese long and short bei passives revisited. Language and Linguistics 17(6). 857–889.
Liu, Na & Huang, C.-T. James. 2016. Control and raising passives, and why Mandarin does not smuggle. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25(4). 385–404.
McIntyre, Andrew. 2012. The become=cause hypothesis and the polysemy of get. Linguistics 50(6). 1251–1287.
Nolan, Brian. 2012. The GET constructions of Modern Irish and Irish English: GET-passive and GET-recipient variations. Linguistics 50(6). 1111–1161.
Peyraube, Alain. 1989. History of the Passive Constructions in Chinese until the 10th Century. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17(2). 335–372.
Richards, Norvin W. 1997. What moves where when in which language? Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2001. A complementation approach to Chinese passives and its consequences. Linguistics 39 (2). 257–295.
Ting, Jen. 1998. Deriving the bei-construction in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7(4). 319–354.
. 2005. On the syntax of suo construction in classical Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 33(2). 233–267.
Whitman, John. 2000. Relabelling. In Pintzuk, Susan & Tsoulas, George & Warner, Anthony (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms, 220–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Xiao, Richard & McEnery, Tony & Qian, Yufang. 2006. Passive constructions in English and Chinese: A corpus-based contrastive study. Languages in Contrast 6(1). 109–149.
Zeng, Jianhong. 2020. A reevaluation of so-called passive constructions in ancient Chinese: From Pre-Qin to the Han dynasty. Ghent: Universiteit Gent. (Doctoral dissertation.)
