Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 26:1 (2025) ► pp.155–189
Light predicate raising in the Mandarin post-VP adverbial nominal constructions
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 12 September 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00181.zha
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00181.zha
Abstract
In Mandarin, a nominal may follow a string that is composed of a monomorphemic verb and its monomorphemic object. The nominal exhibits the same constraints as a preverbal PP. Also, unlike a canonical or non-canonical object, such a nominal cannot be deleted. It is argued that such a nominal is the object of a preposition; the PP is base-generated as a left adverbial of a shortest transitive VP; and after the leftward raising of the light VP and deletion of the preposition, the nominal surfaces to the right of the VP. Based on this study, the paper reports a form economy in syntactic operations.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Major differences of V-PONs from O-PONs
- 3.The non-object properties of V-PONs
- 3.1Various adverbial readings of V-PONs
- 3.2A. The same combination restriction on a preverbal PP
- 3.3B. The same interpretation as a preverbal PP
- 3.4C. The ban on ellipsis
- 4.The VP status and the lightness of the VO string to the left of a V-PON
- 4.1The VO string as a VP
- 4.2The minimal length of a syntactic element
- 5.Two flawed analyses of V-PONs
- 5.1The V-PON construction as a double object construction?
- 5.2A V-PON as the object of a VO string?
- 6.Proposal: Light predicate raising
- 6.1The non-canonical order in extraposition constructions
- 6.2PP-Stranding in V-PON constructions
- 6.3The forms of certain prepositions in the pre- and post-verbal positions
- 6.4Against the light verb analysis of an implicit preposition
- 7.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (49)
Baltin, Mark. 2006a. Extraposition. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 21, 237–271. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Baltin, Mark & Postal, Paul M. 1996. More on reanalysis hypotheses. Linguistic Inquiry 27(1). 127–145.
Barbiers, Sjef. 1995. The syntax of interpretation. Leiden: Leiden University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Barrie, Michael & Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 2015. Analyses versus syntheses: Objects. In Li, Yen-Hui Audrey & Simpson, Andrew & Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan (eds.), Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective, 179–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bresnan, Joan W. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4(3). 275–343.
Büring, Daniel & Hartmann, Katharina. 2015. Semantic coordination without syntactic coordinators. In Toivonen, Ida & Csúri, Piroska & van der Zee, Emile (eds.), Structures in the mind: Essays on language, music, and cognition in honor of Ray Jackendoff, 41–61. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chen, Chuimin. 1995. Tan shubin duanyu dai binyu de ji ge wenti. Jinan Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban) 1995(1). 116–122.
. 2020. The UCLA Lectures (April 29–May 2, 2019). (Manuscript.) ([URL]) (Access date 2024-07-26.)
. 2021. Minimalism: Where are we now, and where can we hope to go. GENGO KENKYU: Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan 1601. 1–41.
Chomsky, Noam & Miller, George A. 1963. Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In Luce, R. Duncan & Bush, Robert R. & Galanter, Eugene (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol. 21, 269–321. New York: Wiley.
Creissels, Denis. 2014. Functive phrases in typological and diachronic perspective. Studies in Language 38(3). 605–647.
Feng, Shengli. 2002. On the interface between prosodic morphology and prosodic syntax. Zhongguo Yuwen 2002(6). 515–524.
Gerdts, Donna B. 1998. Incorporation. In Spencer, Andrew & Zwicky, Arnold M. (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 84–100. London: Blackwell.
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Yoon, Suwon. 2011. The subjective mode of comparison: Metalinguistic comparatives in Greek and Korean. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(3). 621–655.
Haiman, John. 1988. Incorporation, parallelism, and focus. In Hammond, Michael & Moravcsik, Edith & Wirth, Jessica (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, 303–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1993. Reconstruction and the structure of VP: Some theoretical consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 24(1). 103–138.
Larson, Richard K. 1989. Light predicate raising (Lexicon Project Working Papers 27). Cambridge: Lexicon Project, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
Li, Yanzhi & Wu, Yicheng. 2017. On the evolutionary mechanism of disyllabic transitive verbs in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 45(2). 344–393.
Li, Yenhui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine: University of California, Irvine. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Meir, Irit. 1999. Verb classifiers as noun incorporation in Israeli sign language. In Booij, Geert & Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1999, 299–319. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Moro, Andrea & Roberts, Ian. 2024. The duality of syntax: Unstable structures, labelling and linearization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 42(2). 609–631.
Qin, Ye-wei. 2023. A new study on Vn-NP construction — From news headline’s data. Yuyan Yanjiu 43(2). 34–42.
Quirk, Randolph & Greenbaum, Sidney & Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan (eds.). 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Rainer, Franz & Rainer, Franz & Gardani, Francesco & Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Luschützky, Hans Christian (eds.). 2019. Competition in inflection and word-formation. Cham: Springer.
Smith, Wayne Henry. 1989. The morphological characteristics of verbs in Taiwan Sign Language. Bloomington: Indiana University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2017. Transitivization, applicative construction and light verb analysis, Contemporary Research in Modern Chinese 191. 1–13.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan & Yang, Ching-Yu Helen & Chen, Ying-Zhu & Chen, Jhih-Jie & Chang, Jason S. 2022. A data scientific study of transitivization in Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 20 (1). 1–27.
Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris. 2021. Reverse double objects in Hakka ditransitive. Studia Linguistica 75(3). 599–622.
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2018. Non-canonical objects as event kind-classifying elements. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36(4). 1395–1437.
