Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 25:4 (2024) ► pp.747–784
The syntax of Korean reduced conditionals
Right edge and pronominalization
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 27 June 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00168.yoo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00168.yoo
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to provide an analysis of two important aspects of conditional clauses in Korean. The
first goal is to reveal the structure of the conditional clause. In investigating reduced conditionals and regular copula clausal
conditionals, we suggest the right-periphery of conditional clauses based on the Split CP hypothesis (Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The
fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements
of grammar: Handbook in generative
syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ; . 2010. Sentence
types and the Japanese right periphery. (Paper presented at
the International Conference on Sentence Types: Ten Years
After, Frankfurt am Main, 26–28 June
2009.)). The second goal is to examine the
distribution of the clausal pronoun kukes in reduced conditionals, which, we argue, is the result of FinP
ellipsis, building on the ellipsis theory of pronominalization (Baltin, Mark & van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2008. On
becoming a pronoun: Towards a unified theory of ellipsis. (Paper presented at
the 10th CUNY/SUNY/NYU/YU Miniconference, New
York, 22 November 2008.)). In doing so, we make two empirical points: (i) the parallelism regarding argument/adjunct asymmetry indicates
that reduced conditionals are derived from clausal conditionals; and (ii) various connectivity effects reveal hidden clausal
structure behind the pronominal element kukes, which means that there is a tight connection between focus
constructions and conditional constructions in Korean. The implication of the present study is that we can argue against a
simple-minded dichotomy of anaphora that says there are two types of anaphora, Deep and Surface, and Deep anaphora does not have
syntactic structure.
Article outline
- 1.Backgrounds: Reduced conditionals in Korean
- 1.1Roadmap
- 2.The focus-conditional link
- 2.1Pronominal sluicing and pronominal conditionals
- 2.1.1Properties of KPS
- 2.1.2Properties of KPRC
- 2.1Pronominal sluicing and pronominal conditionals
- 3.The analysis of focus constructions in Korean
- 3.1Common properties in focus constructions
- 3.2Analysis: Configurational pronominalization
- 4.The analysis of KPRC
- 4.1Further properties of KPRC
- 4.2Right periphery of conditionals in Korean
- 4.3The derivation of KPRC
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
- List of abbreviations
References
References (73)
Arita, Setsuko. 2007. Japanese
conditional clauses and their properties of tensed
clauses. Tokyo: Kuroshio.
Baltin, Mark. 2006. On
so-called doubly-filled comps that are not. New York: New York University. (Manuscript.)
Baltin, Mark & van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2008. On
becoming a pronoun: Towards a unified theory of ellipsis. (Paper presented at
the 10th CUNY/SUNY/NYU/YU Miniconference, New
York, 22 November 2008.)
Bhatt, Rajesh & Pancheva, Roumyana. 2002. A
cross-constructional analysis of if-clauses. (Paper presented
at the Syntax Seminar: Interface in the CP-domain, Zentrum für Allgemeine
Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, 9 March
2002.)
. 2006. Conditionals. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The
Blackwell companion to
syntax, vol. 11, 638–687. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bresnan, Joan W. 1976. On the form and functioning of
transformations. Linguistic
Inquiry 7(1). 3–40.
Bruening, Benjamin & Dinh, Xuyen & Kim, Lan. 2018. Selection,
idioms, and the structure of nominal phrases with and without classifiers. Glossa: A Journal of
General
Linguistics 3(1). 1–46. (Article
42.)
Cho, Sungdai & Whitman, John & Yanagida, Yuko. 2009. Clefts
in Japanese and Korean. In Bane, Max & Holle, Juan José Bueno & Grano, Thomas & Grotberg, April Lynn & McNabb, Yaron (eds.), CLS
44–1: Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, the main
session, 61–77. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Choi, Young-Sik. 2012. Sluicing
is NOT in Korean. The Journal of Studies in
Language 28(2). 329–351.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures
on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. 1st
edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fukaya, Teruhiko & Hoji, Hajime. 1999. Stripping
and sluicing in Japanese and some implications. In Bird, Sonya & Carnie, Andrew & Haugen, Jason D. & Norquest, Peter (eds.), WCCFL
18: Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal
Linguistics, 145–158. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
Geis, Michael Lorenz. 1970. Adverbial subordinate clauses in
English. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral
dissertation.)
Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Conditional
clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind &
Language 18(4). 317–339.
Han, Chung-hye. 2006. Variation
in form-meaning mapping between Korean and English counterfactuals. Journal of East Asian
Linguistics 15(2). 167–193.
Han, Chung-hye & Hedberg, Nancy. 2008. Syntax
and semantics of it-clefts: A tree adjoining grammar analysis. Journal of
Semantics 25(4). 345–380.
Hiraiwa, Ken & Shinichiro Ishihara. 2002. Missing
links: Cleft, sluicing, and “no da” construction in
Japanese. In Ionin, Tania & Ko, Heejeong & Nevins, Andrew (eds.), Proceedings
of the 2nd HUMIT Student Conference in Language Research (HUMIT
2001), 35–54. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hoshi, Koji. 1995. Structural
and interpretive aspects of head-internal and head-external relative clauses. New York: University of Rochester. (Doctoral
dissertation.)
Jacobson, Pauline. 1995. On
the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Bach, Emmon & Jelinek, Eloise & Kratzer, Angelika & Partee, Barbara H. (eds.), Quantification in natural
languages, 451–486. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kim, Jieun. 2012. What
sluicing comes from in Korean is pseudo-cleft. Korean Journal of
Linguistics 37(1). 69–106.
Kim, Jong-Bok. 2008. Two
types of cleft constructions in Korean: A constraint-based approach. Language and
Information 12(1). 85–103.
. 2013. The
Korean sluicing: As a family of constructions. Studies in Generative
Grammar 23(1). 103–130.
Kim, Jong-Bok & Sells, Peter. 2013. Interactions
between (pseudo-) cleft and copular constructions in Korean. Linguistic
Research 30(1). 93–139.
Kim, Jooyoung. 2018. Embedding
without a license?: Typology of unselected embedded
clauses. Newark: University of Delaware. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Kim, Soowon. 1999. Sloppy/strict
identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis. Journal of East Asian
Linguistics 8(4). 255–284.
Kim, Sun-Woong. 2010. The
syntax of specification and predication: (Kes-) clefts in Korean and English. The Linguistic
Society of Korea
Journal 18(3). 167–185.
Kizu, Mika. 1997. Sluicing
in Wh-in-situ languages. In Singer, Kora & Eggert, Randall & Anderson, Gregory (eds.), CLS
33–1: Proceedings of the 33rd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, papers from the main
session, 231–244. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Ko, Suk-Joo. 2000. Hangugeo
josaui yeongu. Seoul: Yonsei University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Koizumi, Masatoshi. 1995. Phrase
structure in minimalist
syntax. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral
dissertation.)
. 1976. Subject
raising. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax
and semantics, volume 5: Japanese generative
grammar, 17–49. New York: Academic Press.
. 1988. Blended
quasi-direct discourse in Japanese. In Poser, William J. (ed.), Papers from the Second International
Workshop on Japanese
Syntax, 72–102. Stanford: CSLI.
Kuwabara, Kazuki. 1996. Multiple
wh-phrases in elliptical clauses and some aspects of clefts with multiple
foci. In Koizumi, Masatoshi & Oishi, Masayuki & Sauerland, Uli (eds.), Formal
approaches to Japanese linguistics (FAJL
2), 97–116. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Lee, Jeong-Shik. 2012. Resurrecting
sluicing from clefting. Studies in Generative
Grammar 22(2). 359–390.
Marantz, Alec. 1996. “Cat”
as a phrasal idiom: Consequences of late insertion in distributed
morphology. Cambridge: MIT. (Manuscript.)
Merchant, Jason. 1998. Pseudosluicing:
Elliptical clefts in Japanese and English. In Alexiadou, Artemis & Fuhrhop, Nanna & Law, Paul & Kleinhenz, Ursula (eds.), ZAS
working papers in
linguistics 101, 88–112. Berlin: Zertrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.
. 2001. The
syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. New York: Oxford University Press.
. 2006. Sluicing. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The
Blackwell companion to
syntax, vol. IV1, 271–291. London: Blackwell.
Morgan, Jerry L. 1989. Sentence fragments
revisited. In Music, Bradley & Graczyk, Randolph & Wiltshire, Caroline (eds.), CLS
25-2: Papers from the 25th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, part two: Parasession on language in
context, 228–241. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Nakao, Chizuru & Yoshida, Masaya. 2005. Japanese
sluicing as a specificational pseudo-cleft. (Paper presented
at Tokyo Conference on
Psycholinguistics, Tokyo, 18–19 March
2005.)
Nishiyama, Kunio & Whitman, John & Yi, Eun-Young. 1996. Syntactic
movement of overt Wh-phrases in Japanese and Korean. In Akatsuka, Noriko & Iwasaki, Shoichi & Strauss, Susan (eds.), Japanese/Korean
linguistics, vol. 51, 337–351. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Ok, Sung-Soo & Kim, Soo-Yeon. 2012. An
analysis of sluicing-like constructions in Korean: A non-movement approach. Journal of Language
Sciences 19(1). 155–180.
Park, Bum-Sik. 2005. Island-insensitive
fragment answers in Korean. In Alderete, John & Han, Chung-hye & Kochetov, Alexei (eds.), Proceedings
of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal
Linguistics, 317–325. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Park, Myung-Kwan. 2001. Subject-less
clefts in Korean: Towards a deletion analysis. Language
Research 37(4). 715–739.
Percus, Orin. 1997. Prying
open the cleft. In Kusumoto, Kiyomi (ed.), Proceedings
of the North East Linguistic
Society 271, 337–351. Amherst: GLSA.
Perlmutter, David M. 1970. The two verbs
begin. In Roderick A. Jacobs, & Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.), Readings in English
transformational
grammar, 107–119. Waltham: Ginn & Co.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The
fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements
of grammar: Handbook in generative
syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rottman, Isaac & Yoshida, Masaya. 2013. Sluicing,
idioms, and island repair. Linguistic
Inquiry 44(4). 651–668.
. 1985. Some
asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical
implications. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral
dissertation.)
. 2010. Sentence
types and the Japanese right periphery. (Paper presented at
the International Conference on Sentence Types: Ten Years
After, Frankfurt am Main, 26–28 June
2009.)
Sakai, Hiromu. 1998. Raising
asymmetry and improper movement. In Akatsuka, Noriko & Hoji, Hajime & Iwasaki, Shoichi & Sohn, Sung-Ock & Strauss, Susan (eds.), Japanese/Korean
linguistics, vol. 71, 481–497. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Sohn, Keun-Won. 2000. A
non-sluicing, non-clefting approach to copula construction. Studies in Generative
Grammar 101. 267–295.
Takezawa, Koichi. 1987. A
configurational approach to case marking in
Japanese. Seattle: University of Washington. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Yoon, James Hye-Suk. 2004. Non-nominative (major)
subjects and case stacking in Korean. In Bhaskararao, Peri & Subbarao, Karumuri Venkata (eds.), Non-nominative
subjects, vol. 21, 265–314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yoon, Jeong-Me. 1989. ECM
and multiple subject constructions in Korean. In Kuno, Susumu (ed.), Harvard
studies in Korean linguistics
III, 369–382. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Yoshida, Masaya. 2006. Constraints
and mechanisms in long-distance dependency formation. College Park: University of Maryland, College Park. (Doctoral
dissertation.)
