Cover not available

Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 25:2 (2024) ► pp.234–269

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

The semantics of Mandarin futurates

 | Beijing Language and Culture University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 2 April 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00154.he
Abstract
This paper investigates future interpretations in Mandarin declarative root clauses without overt future modals, i.e., Mandarin futurates. Mandarin futurates require future time adverbs and schedulable eventualities, which denote future readings relative to the utterance time or a context-determined past time. Moreover, Mandarin futurates presuppose the existence of a plan in the context and are incompatible with a single perfective aspect marker le1. To account for these facts, I argue that a covert future modal m-plan is present in futurates and extend the formal analysis for English simple futurates to Mandarin with necessary modifications.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Properties of Mandarin simple futurates
    • 2.1Constraints on eventualities
    • 2.2Obligatoriness of future time adverbs
    • 2.3Presupposition of the existence of a plan
    • 2.4Constraints on the evaluation time
    • 2.5Interaction with overt aspect markers
    • 2.6Interim summary
  • 3.The semantics of Mandarin simple futurates
    • 3.1English simple futurates: Copley (2009) & Rullmann et al. (2022)
    • 3.2Interaction between future interpretations and aspect
      • 3.2.1The cross-linguistic picture of aspect in future contexts
      • 3.2.2Previous accounts
      • 3.2.3The proposal
    • 3.3The analysis for Mandarin simple futurates
    • 3.4Differences between m-plan and hui ‘will’
  • 4.Implications on the debate of tense
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (49)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, Robert M. W. 1998. Dependencies between grammatical systems. Language 74(1). 56–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altshuler, Daniel. 2020. Tense and temporal adverbs: “I learned last week that there would now be an earthquake”. In Gutzmann, Daniel & Matthewson, Lisa & Meier, Cécile & Rullmann, Hotze & Zimmermann, Thomas Ede (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to semantics, 1–31. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaver, David I. & Clark, Brady Z. 2008. Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennett, Michael & Partee, Barbara H. 2004[1972]. Toward the logic of tense and aspect in English. In Partee, Barbara H. (ed.), Compositionality in formal semantics: Selected papers by Barbara H. Partee, 59–109. Oxford: Blackwell. (Originally published in 1972 as a technical report for System Development Corporation, and reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club in 1978.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bittner, Maria. 2014. Temporality: Universals and variation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bochnak, M. Ryan. 2016. Past time reference in a language with optional tense. Linguistics and Philosophy 39(4). 247–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Future reference with and without future marking. Language and Linguistics Compass 13(1). 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bochnak, M. Ryan & Hohaus, Vera & Mucha, Anne. 2019. Variation in tense and aspect, and the temporal interpretation of complement clauses. Journal of Semantics 36(3). 407–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cable, Seth. 2017. The implicatures of optional past tense in Tlingit and the implications for ‘discontinuous past’. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35(3). 635–681. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Sihwei. 2018. Finding semantic building blocks: Temporal and modal interpretation in Atayal. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Chung, Sandra & Timberlake, Alan. 1985. Tense, aspect, and mood. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 202–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copley, Bridget. 2002. The semantics of the future. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2009. The semantics of the future. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dai, Yaojing. 1994. “Le” zai biaoshi weilai yiyi juzi zhong de yongfa. In Yu, Zhihong (ed.), Xiandai yuyanxue: Lilun jianshe de xin sikao, 114–122. Beijing: Language and Culture Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1982. Tenses, time adverbs, and compositional semantic theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 5(1). 23–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Mari, Alda. 2018. A unified analysis of the future as epistemic modality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36(1). 85–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10(1). 41–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, Yuyin. 2020. Time in Mandarin: The fingerprints of tense and finiteness. Cambridge: Harvard University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín & Matthewson, Lisa. 2007. Zero-marked tense: The case of Gitxsan. In Elfner, Emily J. & Walkow, Martin (eds.), NELS 37: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 11, 299–309. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1). 3–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang & Li, Ping & Hendriks, Henriette. 2000. Aspect and assertion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18(4). 723–770. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(3). 337–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. The notional category of modality. In Eikmeyer, Hans J. & Rieser, Hannes (eds.), Words, worlds, and contexts: New approaches in word semantics, 38–74. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Modality. In von Stechow, Arnim & Wunderlich, Dieter (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 639–650. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Strolovitch, Devon & Lawson, Aaron (eds.), SALT 8: Proceedings of the Eighth Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, 92–110. Ithaca: CLC Publications, Cornell University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1971. Presupposition and relative well-formedness. In Steinberg, Danny D. & Jakobovits, Leon A. (eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, 329–340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Jo-wang. 2000. On the temporal meaning of the verbal -le in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 1(2). 109–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics 23(1). 1–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. 2009. Incompatible categories: Resolving the “present perfective paradox”. In Hogeweg, Lotte & de Hoop, Helen & Malchukov, Andrej L. (eds.), Cross-linguistic semantics of tense, aspect, and modality, 13–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa. 2006. Temporal semantics in a superficially tenseless language. Linguistics and Philosophy 29(6). 673–713. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. On the (non-)future orientation of modals. In Guevara, Ana Aguilar & Chernilovskaya, Anna & Nouwen, Rick (eds.), SuB 16: Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 161, vol. 21, 431–446. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mucha, Anne. 2015. Temporal interpretation and cross-linguistic variation: A formal semantic analysis of temporal and aspectual reference in Hausa and Medumba. Potsdam: University of Potsdam. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Ogihara, Toshiyuki. 1996. Tense, attitudes, and scope. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pancheva, Roumyana & von Stechow, Arnim. 2004. On the present perfect puzzle. In Moulton, Keir & Wolf, Matthew (eds.), NELS 34: Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 21, 469–483. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara Hall. 1973. Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. The Journal of Philosophy 70(18). 601–609. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reis Silva, Amélia & Matthewson, Lisa. 2007. An instantaneous present tense in Blackfoot. In Deal, Amy Rose (ed.), SULA 4: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on the Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 35), 191–214. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rullmann, Hotze & Huijsmans, Marianne & Matthewson, Lisa & Todorović, Neda. 2022. Why plain futurates are different. Linguistic Inquiry 54(1). 197–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soh, Hooi Ling & Gao, Meijia. 2008. Mandarin sentential -le, perfect and English already. In Dölling, Johannes & Heyde-Zybatow, Tatjana & Schäfer, Martin (eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, 447–473. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sun, Hongyuan. 2014. Temporal construals of bare predicates in Mandarin Chinese. Nantes & Leiden: University of Nantes & Leiden University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Thomas, Guillaume. 2014. Nominal tense and temporal implicatures: Evidence from Mbyá. Natural Language Semantics 22(4). 357–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, Richmond H. 1970. Indeterminist time and truth-value gaps. Theoria 36(3). 264–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2011. The Paraguayan Guaraní future marker –ta: Formal semantics and cross-linguistic comparison. In Musan, Renate & Rathert, Monika (eds.), Tense across languages, 207–231. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2008. Tense anchoring in Chinese. Lingua 118(5). 675–686. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Jiun-Shiung. 2003. Modeling temporal progression in Mandarin: Aspect markers and temporal relations. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2014. Tense and aspect in English infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry 45(3). 403–447. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Akal, Taylan
2024. Plain and Progressive Futurates in Turkish. Cankaya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 18:1 ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
He, Yuyin
2024. Finiteness in Mandarin clausal complements: the role of ICH and future modals. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue