Cover not available

Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 25:1 (2024) ► pp.162–186

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Revisiting sentence-final adjunct WHAT

 | National United University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 2 January 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00152.yan
Abstract
The sentence-final adjunct WHAT has been given much attention for the past few years, mostly on its why-like interpretation and negative force. In this study, evidence will be provided to show that what otherwise seems to be exceptional cases, in effect, constitutes an independent construction, the refutatory WHAT construction. Although such a construction yields a strong negative force, it has the force dwell upon the interlocutor’s attitude or commitment. It is used to refute his/her previous claim in a conversation and can tolerate any utterance form. This is in sharp contrast to the why-like WHAT which is typically used to forbid actions and is restricted to action verbs. As will be revealed later, in syntax, the refutatory WHAT has to employ a component above CP, which not only helps explain the speaker’s refutatory force, but also directs our attention to a new ascending perspective zoned for both the speaker and the hearer/addressee.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Categorizing refutatory WHAT
  • 3.Positioning refutatory WHAT
  • 4.Getting rid of blocking effects
  • 5.Incorporating the addressee
  • 6.Concluding remark
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (45)
References
Beck, Sigrid. 1996. Wh-constructions and transparent logical form. Tübingen: University of Tübingen. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14(1). 1–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid & Kim, Shin-Sook. 1997. On wh- and operator scope in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6(4). 339–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheung, Lawrence Yam-Leung. 2008. The negative wh-construction. Los Angeles: UCLA. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2009. Dislocation focus construction in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18(3). 197–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, Jui-Yi Zoey & Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2020. On the syntactic cartography and pragmatic effects of non-canonical wh-questions: A comparative study of what in Hakka. Zhongguo Yuwen 2020(2). 201–220.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E. 1970. Root and structure-preserving transformations. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
1976. A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure-preserving, and local transformations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio. 2015. Two ReasonPs: What are*(n’t) you coming to the United States for? In Shlonsky, Ur (ed.), Beyond functional sequences (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, The cartography of syntactic structures 10), 220–231. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2006a. Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD, and the left periphery. In Zanuttini, Raffaella & den Dikken, Marcel & Campos, Hector & Herburger, Elena & Portner, Paul H. & Phillips, Colin & Haegeman, Liliane & Beninca, Paola & McCloskey, James & Travis, Lisa deMena (eds.), Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense, and clausal architecture, 27–52. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116(10). 1651–1669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. West flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 116–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Hill, Virginia. 2013. The syntacticization of discourse. In Folli, Raffaella & Sevdali, Christina & Truswell, Robert (eds.), Syntax and its limits, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Chung-Hye. 1998. Deriving the interpretation of rhetorical questions. In Curtis, Emily & Lyle, James & Webster, Gabriel (eds.), The proceedings of the 16th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL-16), 237–253. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions. Lingua 112(3). 201–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Virginia. 2007a. Romanian adverbs and the pragmatic field. The Linguistic Review 24(1). 61–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007b. Vocatives and the pragmatics-syntax interface. Lingua 117(12). 2077–2105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jheng, Wei-Cherng Sam. 2017. The syntax-discourse interface in Mandarin. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 2006. Special interrogatives: Left periphery, wh-doubling, and (apparently) optional elements. In Doetjes, Jenny & Gonzalez, Paz (eds.), Romance language and linguistic theory 2004 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 278), 247–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochi, Masao. 2004. How come and other adjunct wh-phrases: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language and Linguistics 5(1). 29–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Victor Junnan. 2014. Deriving special questions in Mandarin Chinese: A comparative study. In Park, Jong-Un & Lee, Il-Jae (eds.), Comparative syntax: Proceedings of the 16th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, 349–368. Seoul: The Korean Generative Grammar Circle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Architecture of the periphery in Chinese: Cartography and minimalism. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2005. Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistiques de Vincennes 331. 111–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Belletti, Adriana (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, volume 3, 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Corver, Norbert (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on, 97–133. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. On some properties of criterial freezing. In Panagiotidis, E. Phoevos (ed.), The complementizer phase: Subjects and operators, 17–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shao, Jingmin & Zhao, Xiufeng. 1989. “Shenme” fei yiwen yongfa yanjiu. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 1989(1). 26–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shao, Jingmin. 1996. Xiandai Hanyu yiwenju yanjiu. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 2004. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114 (3). 255–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret (Peggy) & Tenny, Carol L. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Di Sciullo, Anna Maria (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar: Volume 1: Syntax and semantics, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2011. On atypical wh-expressions in Chinese. In Editorial Committee of Essays on linguistics (ed.), Essays on linguistics, vol. 431, 194–208. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Changsong. 2017. A study on noncanonical wh-particles from the prosody-syntax interface: A case study of “shenme” in “V ‘shenme’(V)/(NP)” construction. Yunlü Yufa Yanjiu 2(1). 73–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Changsong & Chin, Wei. 2019. When focus stress meets nucleus stress: A case study of the negative deontic “V shenme NP” construction. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 49(4). 721–763.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wible, David & Chen, Eva. 2000. Linguistic limits on metalinguistic negation. Language and Linguistics 1(2). 233–255.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina & Heim, Johannes. 2016. The syntax of confirmationals: A neo-performative analysis. In Kaltenböck, Gunther, & Keizer, Evelien & Lohmann, Arne (eds.), Outside the clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents, 305–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong. 2004. Manifestation of informational focus. Lingua 114(3). 277–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Barry C.-Y. 2012. Intervention effects and wh-construals. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21(1). 43–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Deriving the illocutionary force. (Paper presented at GLOW in Asia X, Hsinchu, 24–26 May 2014.)
2015. What for and adjunct what. (Paper presented at The 10th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (TEAL-10), Tokyo, 13–14 June 2015.)
Yang, Yang & Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2019. An experimental study of the prosodic syntax of force shift. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue 2019(1). 36–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue