Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 24:2 (2023) ► pp.391–436
A more special use of the third person singular pronoun in Shanghainese
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 9 April 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00135.zhu
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00135.zhu
Abstract
This paper investigates the syntax and semantics of the third person singular pronoun ɦi⁶ in
Shanghainese in its non-referential use. Evidence from its phonological dependence and syntactic integration with the preceding
host verb is presented to show that the non-referential ɦi⁶ is a clitic. It is further observed that this use of
ɦi⁶ requires licensing from the [+subjunctive] feature, echoing Qian, Nairong. 2004. Shanghai fangyan zhong de xuniju [On subjunctive sentence of the Shanghai dialect]. Fangyan [Dialect] 2004(2). 97–110. and Jin, Yaohua. 2016. Cong rencheng daici dao xuni biaoji—Shanghaihua “dongci chongdieshi + yi” de yufahua [From personal pronoun to subjunctive marker: On grammaticalization of the VV+[i] construction in Shanghai dialect]. Fangyan [Dialect] 2016(4). 420–424.. However, my analysis diverges from theirs in
treating the ɦi⁶ in question as an expletive licensed by the [+subjunctive] feature, rather than a subjunctive
marker itself on grounds that it is not obligatory in a subjunctive sentence and that the subjunctivity must always be encoded by
other elements in the sentence. ɦi⁶ in this use serves as an emphatic, strengthening the effect of deontic or
imperative force in subjunctive contexts. Furthermore, it is shown that the licensing must obey a locality condition, whereby the
expletive ɦi⁶ must be licensed by a c-commanding licenser in its local domain. From the perspective of
grammaticalization, I propose that ɦi⁶ is going through an intermediate stage of becoming a purely modal
functional marker. A final stage of this “upward” grammaticalization can be found in the expletive use of the third person pronoun
keoi in Cantonese, which has become a more grammaticalized marker that has scope over the sentence. It is
pointed out that the development of the expletive pronoun suggests that being at the right-periphery is a crucial factor in
motivating and facilitating grammaticalization in Chinese. Last, a comparison between the non-referential ɦi⁶ and
the Mandarin non-referential third person pronoun ta in the V-ta-ge-NP/AP construction is
presented, showing that both cases manifest interactions between VP-internal projections and higher functional categories.
Keywords: expletive, mood/modal, clitic, locality condition, grammaticalization
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Distinguishing ɦi⁶2 from D-pronouns
- 2.1Syntactic position of ɦi⁶2
- 2.2Antecedent
- 2.3Semantic constraints
- 3.Non-referential ɦi⁶2 as a clitic
- 3.1Phonological dependence
- 3.2Host
- 3.3Scope
- 4.Deriving V-ɦi⁶2 structure
- 4.1The licensing condition of ɦi⁶2: Subjunctive
- 4.2Deriving V-ɦi⁶2 structure: Locality condition
- 4.3Advantages and implications of the analysis
- 5.Further implications on grammaticalization
- 5.1Why subjunctive? Why agentive?
- 5.2Some speculations on the grammaticalization process
- 5.3A comparison between ɦi⁶2 and ta
- 6.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (75)
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2006. Covert modality in non-finite contexts (Interface Explorations 8). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bybee, Joan L. 1998. “Irrealis” as a grammatical category. Anthropological Linguistics 40(2). 257–271.
Chan, Ning-ping. 1985. The use of the third-person pronoun in Mandarin Chinese. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale 14(1). 47–81.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding (Studies in Generative Grammar 9). Dordrecht: Foris.
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, Roger & Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chung, Sandra & Alan Timberlake. 1985. Tense, aspect, and mood. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 202–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dai, Xiang-ling. 1992. Chinese morphology and its interface with the syntax. Columbus: The Ohio State University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Emonds, Joseph E. 1970. Root and structure-preserving transformations. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Gan, Min. 2011. Jiujiang fangyan zhong de chuzhishi “keoi”ziju [Disposed sentences with third person singular pronoun keoi in Jiujiang dialect]. Xiandai Yuwen [Modern Chinese] 2011(7). 146–149.
Givón, Talmy. 1994. Irrealis and the subjunctive. Studies in Language 18(2). 265–337.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and the composition of the left periphery (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 8). New York: Oxford University Press.
Han, Chung-hye. 1998. The structure and interpretation of imperatives: Mood and force in universal grammar. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Haverkort, Jacobus Maria Wilhelmus. 1993. Clitics and parametrization: Case studies in the interaction of head movement phenomena. Tilburg: Tilburg University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Hopper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4). 465–497.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Huang, C.- T. James. 1991. Modularity and Chinese A-not-A questions. In Georgopoulos, Carol & Ishihara, Roberta (eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, 305–332. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1999. Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29(4). 423–509.
Iljic, Robert. 1987. Empty ta in Mandarin Chinese. Computational Analyses of Asian and African Languages 261. 15–34.
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar (Studies in Linguistics Series 2). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Jiang, Yan & Wang, Yuying. 2016. Counterfactual subjunctive assertions in Shanghai dialect. In Chin, Andy C.-O. & Kwok, Bit-chee & Tsou, Benjamin K. (eds.), Commemorative essays for Professor Yuen-Ren Chao: Father of modern Chinese linguistics, 193–201. Taipei: Crane.
Jin, Yaohua. 2016. Cong rencheng daici dao xuni biaoji—Shanghaihua “dongci chongdieshi + yi” de yufahua [From personal pronoun to subjunctive marker: On grammaticalization of the VV+[i] construction in Shanghai dialect]. Fangyan [Dialect] 2016(4). 420–424.
Kao, Grant. 2014. What makes a Mandarin complement clause subjunctive? In Lam, Zoe & Weber, Natalie (eds.), Proceedings of Northwest Linguistics Conference 29 (University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics 38), 59–98. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
Klavans, Judith L. 1985. The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization. Language 61(1). 95–120.
Kojima, Miyuki. 2006. Yu “geiyu” xiangguan de rencheng daici wuzhi yongfa [The non-referential uses of personal pronouns related to give]. (Paper presented at the IACL-14 & IsCLL-10, Taipei, 25–29 May 2006.)
Ladusaw, William A. 1980. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistic Club. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Laitinen, Lea. 2002. From logophoric pronoun to discourse particle: A case study of Finnish and Saami. In Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 49), 327–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lin, Jo-wang. 1994. Object expletives, definitesness effect and scope interpretation. In Gonzàlez, Mercè (ed.), NELS 24: Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistics Society, vol. 11, 287–301. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Lin, Jo-wang & Zhang, Niina Ning. 2006. The syntax of the non-referential TA ‘it’ in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics 7(4). 799–824.
Lin, Huayong & Li, Minying. 2019. Cong Lianjiang fangyan kan Yueyu “keoi” zi chuzhiju [The Cantonese disposal construction with keoi: Evidence from the Lianjiang dialect]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2019(1). 89–101.
Lu, Louis Wei-lun & Su, Lily I-wen. 2009. Speech in interaction: Mandarin particle Le as a marker of intersubjectivity. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 14(1). 155–168.
Man, Patricia Yuk-Hing. 1998. Postverbal keoi as a marker for nonasserted bounded clauses. In Matthews, Stephen (ed.), Studies in Cantonese linguistics, 53–62. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
Obata, Masabumi. 1892. Huyu bian shang [The Shanghainese dialect guide for visiting traders]. Shanghai: Nihondō Shoten.
Pan, Victor Junnan. 2015. Mandarin peripheral construals at the syntax-discourse interface. The Linguistic Review 32(4). 819–868.
Panzeri, Francesca. 2006. Subjunctive relative clauses. In Denis, Pascal & McCready, Eric & Palmer, Alexis & Reese, Brian J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference: Issues at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, 60–68. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Postal, Paul M. 1969. On so-called “pronouns” in English. In Reibel, David A. & Schane, Sanford A. (eds.), Modern studies in English: Readings in transformational grammar, 201–224. Hoboken: Prentice-Hall.
Postal, Paul M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1988. Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions. Linguistic Inquiry 19(4). 635–670.
Qian, Nairong. 2004. Shanghai fangyan zhong de xuniju [On subjunctive sentence of the Shanghai dialect]. Fangyan [Dialect] 2004(2). 97–110.
Qiang, Xingna. 2011. Shanghaihua guoqu xuni biaoji “manhao”–jianlun Hanyu fangyan guoqu xuni biaoda de leixing [The past subjunctive mood marker manhao in the Shanghai dialect]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2011(2). 155–163.
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, Ian. 2011. Head movement and the minimalist program. In Boeckx, Cedric (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, 195–219. New York: Oxford University Press.
Su, Yu-Ying Julia. 2012. The syntax of functional projections in the vP periphery. Toronto: University of Toronto. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Sui, Na & Hu, Jianhua. 2016. Dongci chongdie de jufa [The syntax of verbal reduplication in Chinese]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 18(3). 317–338.
. 2019. Jumo zhuci “kan” de jufa he yuyi [The syntax and semantics of the tentative particle kan in Chinese: From the perspective of the new descriptivism]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 21(3). 350–363.
Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2003. Hanyu fangyan yufa de canshu lilun [A parametric theory of Chinese dialectal grammar]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Travis, Lisa deMena. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2010. Inner aspect: The articulation of VP (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 80). Dordrecht: Springer.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2015. On the topography of Chinese modals. In Shlonsky, Ur (ed.), Beyond functional sequence (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 10), 275–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2018. High applicatives are not high enough: A cartographic solution. Lingua Sinica 41. 1–21. (Article no. 2.)
Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26(1). 79–123.
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1999. Clitics: A state-of-the-art report. In van Riemsdijk, Henk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, 1–30. Belin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wu, Xiu-Zhi Zoe. 2004. Grammaticalization and language change in Chinese: A formal view. New York: Routledge Curzon.
Wu, Yicheng & Matthews, Stephen. 2010. How different are expletive and referential pronouns? A parsing perspective. Lingua 120(7). 1805–1820.
Xu, Liejiong. 1999. A special use of the third person singular pronoun. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale 28(1). 3–22.
Xu, Liejiong & Shao, Jingmin. 1998. Shanghai fangyan yufa yanjiu [Studies on Shanghainese grammar]. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
Yeh, Jui-chuan. 2006. On the excessive construction in Mandarin Chinese. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 32(2). 93–118.
Yuan, Yulin. 2003. Wuzhi daici “ta” de jufa yuyi gongneng [The syntactic and semantic functions of the non-referential pronoun ta]. In Editorial Office of Zhongguo Yuwen (ed.), Yufa yanjiu he tansuo [Research & explorations in Chinese grammar], vol. 121, 44–64. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2005. Juggling singular and plural pronouns. Chiayi: National Chung Cheng University. (Manuscript.)
. 2007. A syntactic account of the direct object restriction in Chinese. Language Research 43(1). 53–75.
. 2017. Unifying two general licensors of completive adverbials in syntax. Linguistics 55(2). 371–411.
Zhu, Jialei. Forthcoming. Shanghaihua zhong “dongjieshi-tʰəʔ⁷” de jufa jiegou [The syntax of VR-tʰəʔ⁷ construction in Shanghainese]. (Accepted by Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences].)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
