Cover not available

Article published In: Degrees and Grammar: An East Asian Perspective:
Edited by Qiongpeng Luo, Zhiguo Xie and Xiao Li
[Language and Linguistics 24:1] 2023
► pp. 120–146

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

The semantics of scalar equatives in Mandarin Chinese

 | Southeast University
 | Nanjing University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 12 December 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00127.cao
Abstract
The article presents a formal analysis of the xiang……yiyang scalar equative construction in Mandarin Chinese (MSEs). In the standard degree-based approach, scalar equatives are widely assumed to express an asymmetrical linear ordering between two degree-denoting descriptions such that the degree to which the comparee possesses is at least as great as the degree to which the standard possesses. However, this standard analysis would fall short of MSEs, which display a cluster of properties that are unexpected on the standard account: (i) MSEs disallow differentials; (ii) MSEs cannot take measure phrases as the standard; (iii) MSEs in general do not license NPIs in the standard phrases, and (iv) MSEs disallow factor phrases that express multiplication of numerical values. We propose that unlike scalar equatives in English (ESEs), where the comparison of equality is based on asymmetrical linear ordering of the degrees as points, MSEs recur to degrees as kinds, and consequently, the comparison of equality in the latter is based on instantiation of the degree-kinds, namely, equality of properties. The commonalities and differences between MSEs and ESEs suggest that, despite the fact that degrees and properties are semantic objects of distinct types, the underlying connection between them runs deep and fundamental.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Equative constructions: A standard degree-based account
  • 3.The properties of scalar equatives in Mandarin Chinese
  • 4.The proposal
    • 4.1Two strategies of making comparison of equality
    • 4.2The syntax and semantics of scalar equatives in Mandarin
  • 5.Explaining the facts
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (54)
References
Abbott, Barbara. 2010. Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alrenga, Peter. 2010. Comparisons of similarity and difference. In Hofherr, Patricia Cabredo & Matushansky, Ora (eds.), Adjectives: Formal analyses in syntax and semantics, 155–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Curt & Morzycki, Marcin. 2015. Degrees as kinds. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33(3). 791–828. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid. 2012. Comparison constructions. In Maienborn, Claudia & von Heusinger, Klaus & Portner, Paul (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 2, 1341–1389. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid & Oda, Toshiko & Sugisaki, Koji. 2004. Parametric variation in the semantics of comparison: Japanese vs. English. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13(4). 289–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid & Krasikova, Sveta & Fleischer, Daniel & Gergel, Remus & Hofstetter, Stefan & Savelsberg, Christiane & Vanderelst, John & Villalta, Elisabeth. 2009. Crosslinguistic variation in comparison constructions. In van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen (ed.), Linguistic variation yearbook 2009, 1–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh. & Takahashi, Shoichi. 2011. Reduced and unreduced phrasal comparatives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(3). 581–620. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bochnak, Michael Ryan. 2013. Cross-linguistic variation in the semantics of comparatives. Chicago: The University of Chicago. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Bresnan, Joan. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4(3). 275–343.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Amherst: UMass Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Chen, Yi-Hsun. 2010. The syntax and semantics of Chinese equatives. Hsinchu: National Chiao Tung University. (Master’s thesis.)
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6(4). 339–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Culicover, Peter & Wasow, Thomas & Akmajian, Adrian (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresswell, Maxwell John. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Partee, Barbara H. (ed.), Montague grammar, 261–292. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka. 2018. Clausal comparison without degree abstraction in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36(2). 445–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francez, Itamar & Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2017. Semantics and morphosyntactic variation: Qualities and the grammar of property concepts. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander & Landman, Fred. 1998. Strange relatives of the third kind. Natural Language Semantics 6(2). 125–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Buchholz, Oda. 1998. Equatives and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In van der Auwera, Johan & Ó Baoill, Dónall P. (eds.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & the Leipzig Equative Constructions Team. 2017. Equative constructions in a world-wide perspective. In Treis, Yvonne & Vanhove, Martine (eds.), Similative and equative constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 9–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin. (Unpublished manuscript.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hohaus, Vera & Bochnak, M. Ryan. 2020. The grammar of degree: Gradability across languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 61. 235–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hohaus, Vera & Zimmermann, Malte. 2021. Comparison of equality with German so…wie, and the relationship between degrees and properties. Journal of Semantics 38(1). 95–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, I-Ta Chris. 2015. Remark: Long-distance reflexives, blocking effects, and the structure of Mandarin comparatives. Syntax 18(1). 78–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobson, Pauline. 1995. On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Bach, Emmon & Jelinek, Eloise & Kratzer, Angelika & Partee, Barbara H. (eds.), Quantification in natural languages, 451–486. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 1999. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Comparative deletion and optimality in syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3). 553–621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1). 1–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Modes of comparison. In Elliott, Malcolm & Kirby, James & Sawada, Osamu & Staraki, Eleni & Yoon Suwon (eds.), Proceedings from the Main Session of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 139–163. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. & McNally, Louise. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81(2). 345–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krasikova, Sveta. 2008. Comparison in Chinese. In Bonami, Olivier & Hofherr, Patricia Cabredo (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics volume 7, 263–281. Paris: Colloque de Syntaxe et Sémantique à Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William A. 1980. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Bloomington: Linguistics Club, Indiana University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lechner, Winfried. 2001. Reduced and phrasal comparatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19(4). 683–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Jo-wang. 2009. Chinese comparatives and their implicational parameters. Natural Language Semantics 17(1). 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Luther Cheng-Sheng. 1996. A note on Chinese comparatives. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 26(1/2). 215–236.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luo, Qiongpeng. 2019. Yuyixue yu xingtai jufa bianyi: Yi Ying Han yu liangji dengbiju weili [Semantics and morphosyntactic variation: The case of scalar equatives in English and Mandarin]. Waiguoyu [Journal of Foreign Languages] 31. 47–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luo, Qiongpeng & Cao, Yuzhen. 2018. Equatives are not all equal: A correlative analysis of scalar equatives in Mandarin Chinese. (Paper presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 54), Chicago, April 26–28 2018.)
Luo, Qiongpeng. & Xie, Zhiguo. 2018. Degrees as nominalized properties: evidence from differential verbal comparatives in Mandarin Chinese. In Sauerland, Uli & Solt, Stephanie (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22 (SuB 22), vol. 2, 89–106. Berlin: Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendia, Jon Ander. 2017. Amount relatives redux. Amherst: UMass Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2020. Reference to ad hoc kinds. Linguistics and Philosophy 43(6). 589–631. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike. 2009. Degree structure as trope structure: A trope-based analysis of positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 32(1). 51–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penka, Doris. 2017. The semantics of equatives in English and German. (Paper presented at the workshop Microvariation in Semantics, Berlin, September 6 2017.)
Rett, Jessica. 2013. Semilatives and the argument structure of verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(4). 1101–1137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Measure phrase equatives and modified numerals. Journal of Semantics 32(3). 425–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger & Wilkinson, Karina. 2002. Quantifiers in comparatives: A semantics of degree based on intervals. Natural Language Semantics 10(1). 1–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scontras, Gregory. 2017. A new kind of degree. Linguistics and Philosophy 40(2). 165–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A. M. 1973. The comparative. In Kiefer, F. & Ruwet, N. (eds.), Generative grammar in Europe, 528–564. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Yu Zhu. 1984. Yu xiang youguan de jige wenti [Several issues related to xiang]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 1984(1). 13–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sun, Yenan. 2019. Same as the parameter of an equation construction. In Franke, Michael & Kompa, Nikola & Liu, Mingya & Mueller, Jutta L. & Schwab, Juliane (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 24, vol. 21, 306–318.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Decomposing same. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. ([URL]) (Accessed on 2021-08-15.)
von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3(1–2). 1–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treis, Yvonne. 2018. Comparative constructions: An introduction. Linguistic Discovery 16(1). i–xxvi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wellwood, Alexis. 2015. On the semantics of comparison across categories. Linguistics and Philosophy 38(1). 67–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 1982. Shuo gen…yiyang [On gen…yiyang]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 1982(1). 1–5.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue