Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 23:3 (2022) ► pp.569–600
語義有定還是語用有定
以澄海話量名短語的兩種解讀為例
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Article language: Undefined
Published online: 13 July 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00115.zha
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00115.zha
Semantic definiteness or pragmatic definiteness: Evidence from two interpretations of Cl-NPs in the Chenghai dialect
By examining the Cl-NP phrase in the Chenghai dialect, this paper intends to explore the interrelation between its syntactic distributions and semantic interpretations. It is observed that Cl-NPs at subject position are generally encoded definitely and those at object position are interpreted indefinitely. Exceptions are observed that Cl-NPs at object position can be encoded definitely and indefinitely when they are object controllers in the control construction or with malfactive or beneficiary thematic roles when acting as prepositional objects. We assume that the definite and indefinite interpretations of Cl-NPs are due to the interactions between syntactic constraints and discourse support. Syntactically, Cl-NPs are all DPs with an empty head D, which is assigned value by an existential operator when interpreted indefinitely or by the antecedent in Dis(course)P when encoded definitely. The definite interpretation of Cl-NPs is thus considered to be a pragmatic one.
Keywords: Cl-NP, definite, indefinite, syntactic constraint, discourse
Article outline
- 1.引言
- 2.量名短語的句法分佈及其語義解讀
- 2.1主語位置的量名短語
- 2.2賓語位置的量名短語
- 2.3句法位置與量名短語的解讀
- 3.量名短語的兩種解讀
- 3.1兼語句中的量名短語
- 3.1.1控制句與量名短語的語義解讀
- 3.1.2控制句中的量名短語:是否控制語與是否兩解
- 3.2充當介賓的兩種解讀的量名短語
- 3.2.1充當介賓的兩種解讀的量名短語:句法表現
- 3.2.2施用結構與量名短語的語義解讀
- 3.3孤島效應與量名短語的語義解讀
- 3.1兼語句中的量名短語
- 4.量名短語的句法結構與語義解讀
- 5.結論
- 謝辭
- 筆記
參考文獻
References (46)
Abney, Steven Paul. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so bare NPs and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542.
. 2005. Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In Cinque, Guglielmo & Kayne, Richard S. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 259–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cheng, Zhenquan (成鎮權). 2007. Zaitan “jianyu shi” 再談「兼語式」 [A revisit to pivotal construction in Mandarin Chinese]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 語言教學與研究 [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 2007(6). 7–14.
Choi, Jinyoung & Romero, Maribel. 2008. Rescuing existential free choice items in episodic sentences. In Bonami, Olivier & Cabredo-Hofherr, Patricia (eds.) Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, vol. 71, 77–98. Paris: CNRS.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Cannen. 1997. Types of predicates and the representation of existential readings. In Lawson, Aaron (ed.), Proceedings of SALT 7, 117–134. Ithaca: Cornell University.
Fan, Jiyan (范繼淹). 1985. Wuding NP zhuyuju 無定NP主語句 [The construction with indefinite NP subjects]. Zhongguo Yuwen 中國語文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1985(5). 321–328.
Feng, Shengli. 1995. GB-theory and the passive construction in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 11. 1–28.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 1999. Chinese passive in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29(4). 423–509.
Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Yen-Hui Audrey & Li, Yafei. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgement. Foundations of Language 9(2). 153–185.
Lee, Hun-Tak Thomas. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. Los Angeles: UCLA. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Li, Yafei. 1995. The thematic hierarchy and causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13(2). 255–282.
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1998. Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4). 693–702.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 609–665.
Lu, Shuo (陸爍) & Pan, Haihua (潘海華). 2009. Hanyu wuding zhuyu de yuyi yunzhun fenxi 漢語無定主語的語義允准分析 [The semantic licensing conditions of indefinite subjects in Mandarin Chinese] Zhongguo Yuwen 中國語文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2009(6). 528–537.
Pesetsky, David. 1987.
Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In Reuland, Eric J. & ter Meulen, Alice (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, 98–129. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3). 365–424.
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Schubert, Lenhart K. & Hwang, Chung Hee. 1989. An episodic knowledge representation for narrative texts. In Brachman, Ronald J. & Levesque, Hector J. & Reiter, Raymond (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 444–458. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Simpson, Andrew. 2005. Classifiers and DP structure in Southeast Asia. In Cinque, Guglielmo & Kayne, Richard S. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 806–838. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In Kiefer, Ferenc & Kiss, Katalin E. (eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian (Syntax and Semantics 27), 179–274. New York: Academic Press.
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 1990. Chinese phrase structure and the extended x’ theory. Ithaca: Cornell University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Tang, Sze-Wing (鄧思穎). 2010. Xingshi Hanyu jufaxue 形式漢語句法學 [Formal Chinese syntax]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Press.
Tomioka, Satoshi & Kim, Lan. 2017. The give-type benefactive constructions in Korean and Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26(3). 233–257.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2001. On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantics interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10(2). 129–168.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan (蔡維天). 2010. Tan hanyu motaici fenbu yu quanshi de duiying guanxi 談漢語模態詞分佈與詮釋的對應關係 [On the syntax-semantics correspondences of Chinese modals]. Zhongguo Yuwen 中國語文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2010(3). 208–221.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2015. A tale of two peripheries: Evidence from Chinese adverbials, light verbs, applicatives and object fronting. In Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan (ed.), The cartography of Chinese syntax, 1–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan (蔡維天). 2017. Jiwuhua, shiyong jiegou yu qingdongci fenxi 及物化、施用結構與輕動詞分析 [Transtivization, applicative constructions and analysis of light verbs]. Gendai Chugoku Kenkyu 現代中國語研究 [Contemporary Research in Modern Chinese] 191. 1–13.
Wu, Yicheng (吳義誠). 2018. Yufaxing yu yuyongxing—Hanyu mingci duanyu zuo youding jiedu de shizhi 語法性與語用性—漢語名詞短語作有定解讀的實質 [Grammaticality and pragmaticality: On the nature of definitely interpreted NPs in Sinitic languages]. Dangdai Yuyanxue 當代語言學 [Contemporary Linguistics] 20(4). 497–515.
Wurm, Stephen A. & Liu, Yongquan (eds.). 1987. Language atlas of China: Chinese dialects in China, vol. 11. Hong Kong: Longman Group.
Xing, Xin (邢欣). 1990. Lun “dixi shi” 論「遞系式」 [On the copular construction]. Shanghai: Fudan University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Xu, Liejiong. 1997. Limitation on subjecthood of numerically quantified noun phrases: A pragmatic approach. In Xu, Liejiong (ed.), The referential properties of Chinese noun phrases, 25–44. Paris: EHESS.
Zhang, Qingwen & Tang, Sze-Wing. 2010. CI-NP phrases in five Chinese dialects. (Paper presented at 18th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics & 22nd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, Cambridge (MA), 20–22 May 2010.)
Zhang, Qingwen (張慶文) & Tang, Sze-Wing (鄧思穎). 2014. Gongxing yu chayi: Yue fangyan mingci duanyu yanjiu 共性與差異:粵方言名詞短語研究 [Similarities and differences: A study of nominal phrases in Cantonese]. Yuyan ji Yuyanxue 語言暨語言學 [Language and Linguistics] 15(5). 733–760.
