Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 23:2 (2022) ► pp.212–239
From transitive to intransitive and voiceless to voiced in Proto-Sino-Tibetan
New evidence from Stau, Geshiza, and Khroskyabs
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 29 April 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00104.gat
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00104.gat
Abstract
This paper offers new evidence from Stau, Geshiza, and Khroskyabs to address the question of directionality in valency-changing derivations in Sino-Tibetan. Examining Stau, Geshiza, and Khroskyabs causative and anticausative verb stem pairs adds to the evidence that in Proto-Sino-Tibetan, a number of intransitive stems are derived from transitive stems, in some cases as the result of *N‑ prefixation, and in other cases from voicing alternation independent of *N‑ prefixation. In addition, the proto-sigmatic prefix (*s-) does not cause devoicing in Stau, Geshiza, and Khroskyabs, but rather often undergoes voicing assimilation, and has more than just a causativization function. Furthermore, by looking at Gyalrong, Minyag, Tangut, Middle Chinese, and Old Chinese we emphasize that there is no synchronic evidence to support devoicing induced by *s‑, nor is there historical evidence to support the claim that *s‑ caused devoicing in Proto-Gyalrongic, or even at genetically deeper stages.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Goal and structure of the paper
- 1.2A brief introduction to Stau, Geshiza, and Khroskyabs
- 1.2.1Introduction to Stau
- 1.2.2Introduction to Geshiza
- 1.2.3Introduction to Khroskyabs
- 2.Anticausativization derived by voicing alternation
- 2.1Anticausativization in Stau
- 2.2Anticausativization in Geshiza
- 2.3Anticausativization in Khroskyabs
- 3.The s‑ prefix in Stau, Geshiza, and Khroskyabs
- 3.1s‑ prefix: Stau and Geshiza
- 3.2s‑ prefix: Khroskyabs
- 4.Non-causative functions of the *s‑ prefix
- 5.Diachronic implications
- 5.1Introduction to the question of directionality of valency-changing derivations in Sino-Tibetan studies
- 5.2Evidence in favor of transitive to intransitive derivation from Stau, Geshiza, and Khroskyabs
- 5.2.1Aspiration contrast neutralization by voicing
- 5.2.2The sigmatic prefix does not cause devoicing
- 5.2.3Preinitial *N‑ probably existed in Khroskyabs
- 5.3Corraborating evidence from other languages
- 5.3.1Japhug Gyalrong
- 5.3.2Minyag
- 5.3.3Middle and Old Chinese
- 5.3.4Tangut
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (34)
Comrie, Bernard. 1974. Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society 73(1). 1–32.
Dixon, R. M. W. 2000. A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 30–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duo’erji. 1998. Daofuyu Geshizahua yanjiu [A study of Geshiza Stau]. Beijing: China Tibetology Publishing House.
Gao, Yang. 2015. Description de la langue Menya: Phonologie et syntaxe [Description of the Menya language: Phonology and syntax]. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Gates, Jesse P. 2017. Verbal triplication morphology in Stau (Mazi dialect). Transactions of the Philological Society 115(1). 14–26.
2021. A grammar of Mazur Stau. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Gates, Jesse P. & Kim, Won Ho. 2018. Vowel harmony in Stau. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41(2). 263–293.
Gates, Jesse P. & Nyi.ma, Thub.bstan & Rgyal.mtsan, Tshe.ring. 2019. Tibetan dining etiquette: A sociolinguistic analysis of a normative discourse text in Stau. Himalayan Linguistics 18(2). 73–81.
Genxia, Wengmu & Suzuki, Hiroyuki. 2008. Dàofúyǔ de shǐyòng qíngkuàng hé yǔyán huólì: Xiānshuǐzhèn de gè’àn yánjiū [Actual situation of the language use of sTau and its language vitality: A case study of sTau spoken in Xianshui town]. Kyoto University Linguistic Research 271. 223–240.
Gerner, Matthias. 2007. The lexicalization of causative verbs in the Yi group. Folia Linguistica Historica 28(1–2). 145–186.
Handel, Zev. 2012. Valence-changing prefixes and voicing alternation in Old Chinese and Proto-Sino-Tibetan: Reconstructing *s‑ and *N‑ prefixes. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 61–82.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2016. Universals of causative and anticausative verb formation and the spontaneity scale. Lingua Posnaniensis 58(2). 33–63.
. 2019. A grammar of Eastern Geshiza: A culturally anchored description. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Huang, Bufan. 2007. Lawurongyu yanjiu [Studies on the Lavrung language]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie et morphologie du Japhug (rGyalrong). Paris: Université Paris VII – Denis Diderot. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2012a. An internal reconstruction of Tibetan stem alternations. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(2). 212–224.
. 2012b. Argument demotion in Japhug Rgyalrong. In Authier, Gilles & Haude, Katharina (eds.), Ergativity, valency and voice (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 48), 199–225. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 2014. Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute [Sketch of Tangut historical phonology and morphology] (The Languages of Asia Series 12). Leiden: Brill.
. 2015. The origin of the causative prefix in Rgyalrong languages and its implication for proto-Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Folia Linguistica Historica 361. 165–198.
Jacques, Guillaume & Lai, Yunfan & Antonov, Anton & Nima, Lobsang. 2017. Stau (Ergong, Horpa). In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 597–613. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.
Kittilä, Seppo. 2013. Causative morphemes as a de-transitivizing device: What do non-canonical instances reveal about causation and causativization? Folia Linguistica 47(1). 113–138.
Lai, Yunfan. 2016. Causativisation in Wobzi and other Khroskyabs dialects. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 45(2). 148–175.
. 2017. Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi [A grammar of Wobzi Khroskyabs]. Paris: Université Paris 3 – Sorbonne Nouvelle. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Lai, Yunfan & Gong, Xun & Gates, Jesse P. & Jacques, Guillaume. 2020. Tangut as a West Gyalrongic language. Folia Linguistica 54(s41–s1). 171–203.
Lin, You-Jing. 2016. Jiāróngyǔ Zhuókèjīhuà yǔfǎ biāozhù wénběn [Cogtse Rgyalrong texts: Fully analyzed spontaeous narratives with an updated grammar sketch of the language]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (China).
Mei, Tsu-Lin. 2012. The causative *s‑ and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 1–28.
Sagart, Laurent & Baxter, William H. 2012. Reconstructing the *s‑ prefix in Old Chinese. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 29–59.
Song, Jae Jung. 2013. Nonperiphrastic causative constructions. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ([URL]) (Accessed 2021-10-07.)
Tunzhi. 2017. Language vitality and glottonyms in the Ethnic Corridor: The rTa’u language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2017(245). 147–168.
Tunzhi & Suzuki, Hiroyuki & Roche, Gerald. 2019. Language contact and the politics of recognition amongst Tibetans in the People’s Republic of China: The rTa’u-speaking ‘Horpa’ of Khams. In Sonntag, Selma K. & Turin, Mark (eds.), The politics of language contact in the Himalaya, 17–48. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
Vanderveen, Chantel A. 2015. A phonology of Stau. Langley, BC: Trinity Western University. (Master’s thesis.)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Lai, Yunfan
Gates, Jesse P.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
