Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 22:1 (2021) ► pp.111–166
Exhaustivity and bare numeral phrases in Mandarin
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 16 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00079.tsa
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00079.tsa
Abstract
A well-known generalization about bare numeral phrases (BNPs) in Mandarin is that they tend to require the existential verb you ‘have’ when in subject position, but there are some notable exceptions. This paper concentrates on the data cited by Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1998. Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4). 693–702. and proposes an Exhaustivity Condition according to which a subject BNP is felicitous if and only if it is interpreted exhaustively. It is shown how this condition generalizes to all the constructions under discussion, while at the same time they each belong to a particular type of quantificational construction or another (cumulativity, scalar focus, sufficiency, or conditional). I argue that the close relation between Mandarin subject BNPs and exhaustivity not only explains the restricted distribution of the former but also enables us to account for their so-called quantity readings in terms of exhaustive interpretation. Comparisons of the proposal with previous approaches will also be discussed.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous analyses
- 2.1
Li 1998
- 2.1.1The NumP hypothesis
- 2.1.2Discussion on the NumP hypothesis
- 2.2
Tsai 2001
- 2.2.1The extended mapping hypothesis
- 2.2.2Discussion on the extended mapping hypothesis
- 2.3
Lu 2004
- 2.3.1The carlsonian analysis
- 2.3.2Discussion on the Carlsonian analysis
- 2.1
Li 1998
- 3.Proposal
- 3.1Alternatives and focus interpretation
- 3.2Cumulativity and exhaustivity
- 3.3Association with focus particles
- 3.4Sufficiency and exhaustivity
- 3.5Conditionals and exhaustivity
- 3.6Some notes on “individual-denoting” BNPs
- 4.Other cases of exhaustivity
- 4.1Contrastive topics
- 4.2Distributivity
- 4.3Double singular BNPs
- 4.4Question-answer congruence
- 5.Comparison with previous accounts
- 6.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (68)
Beck, Sigrid & Rullmann, Hotze. 1999. A flexible approach to exhaustivity in questions. Natural Language Semantics 7(3). 249–298.
Beck, Sigrid & Sauerland, Uli. 2000. Cumulation is needed: A reply to Winter (2000). Natural Language Semantics 8(4). 349–371.
Biq, Yung-O. 1984. The semantics and pragmatics of cai and jiu in Mandarin Chinese. Ithaca: Cornell University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
1988. From focus in proposition to focus in speech situation: cai and jiu in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 16(1). 72–108.
Büring, Daniel & Križ, Manuel. 2013. It’s that, and that’s it! Exhaustivity and homogeneity presuppositions in clefts (and definites). Semantics and Pragmatics 61. 1–29.
Carlson, Greg N. 1977. A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(3). 413–457.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542.
. 2014. The syntactic structure of noun phrases. In Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Y.-H. Audrey & Simpson, Andrew (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 248–274. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 2009. On every type of quantificational expression in Chinese. In Giannakidou, Anastasia & Rathert, Monika (eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, 53–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chierchia, Gennaro & Fox, Danny & Spector, Benjamin. 2013. Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon. In Maienborn, Claudia & von Heusinger, Klaus & Portner, Paul (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 31, 2297–2332. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Fan, Jiyian. 1985. Wuding NP zhuyu ju [Sentences with indefinite NP subjects]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1985(5). 321–328.
Fang, Huilin. 2010. The Mandarin existential construction: A verbal analysis of you. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University. (Master’s thesis.)
Fang, Huilin & Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2008. The Mandarin you existential: A verbal analysis. UST Working Papers in Linguistics 41. 43–56.
von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on quantifier domains. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York: Academic Press.
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Hole, Daniel. 2004. Focus and background marking in Mandarin Chinese: System and theory behind cái, jiù, dōu and yĕ. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
. 2006. Mapping VPs to restrictors: Anti-Diesing effects in Mandarin Chinese. In von Heusinger, Klaus & Turner, Ken (eds.), Where semantics meets pragmatics, 337–380. Amsterdam: Elsevie.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1988. Shuo shi he you
[On be and have
]. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philosophy 59(1). 43–64.
Huang, Shi-Zhe. 1996. Quantification and predication in Mandarin Chinese: A case study of dou. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Jiang, Li. 2012. Nominal arguments and language variation. Cambridge: Harvard University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Jiang, Yan & Pan, Hai-hua & Zou, Chong-li. 1997. On the semantic content of noun phrases. In Xu, Liejiong (ed.), The referential properties of Chinese noun phrases, 3–24. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.
Johnston, Michael. 1994. The syntax and semantics of adverbial adjuncts. Santa Cruz: University of California at Santa Cruz. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In Carlson, Gregory N. & Pelletier, Francis Jeffry (eds.), The generic book, 125–175. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
. 2014. Situations in natural language semantics. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. (Spring 2014 edition.)
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution, and quantification in event semantics. In Bartsch, Renate & van Benthem, Johan F. A. K. & van Emde Boas, Peter (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression, 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris Publication.
. 1999. At least some determiners aren’t determiners. In Turner, Ken (ed.), The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view, 257–291. Oxford: Elsevier.
Lai, Huei-Ling. 1995. Rejected expectations: The scalar particles cai and jiu in Mandarin Chinese. Austin: University of Texas at Austin. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 1999. Rejected expectations: The scalar particles cai and jiu in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 37(4). 625–661.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Larson, Richard & Sawada, Miyuki. 2012. Root transformations and quantificational structure. In Aelbrecht, Lobke & Haegeman, Liliane & Nye, Rachel (eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons, 47–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lee, Thomas H.-T. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. Los Angeles: UCLA. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1998. Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4). 693–702.
Liao, Hsiu-Chen. 2011. Alternatives and exhaustification: Non-interrogative uses of Chinese wh-words. Cambridge: Harvard University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Liao, Wei-wen. 2011. The symmetry of syntactic relations. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 1997. On ge and other related problems. In Xu, Liejiong (ed.), The referential properties of Chinese noun phrases, 209–253. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.
Link, Godehard. 1987. Generalized quantifiers and plurals. In Gärdenfors, Peter (ed.), Generalized quantifiers: Linguistic and logical approaches, 151–180. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Liu, Feng-hsi. 1997. Scope and specificity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Liu, Mingming. 2017. Varieties of alternatives: Mandarin focus particles. Linguistics and Philosophy 40(1). 61–95.
Liu, Yi-Fen. 2005. The fine structure of distributivity in Chinese. Hsinchu: National Chiao Tung University. (Master’s thesis.)
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of n-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 609–665.
Lu, Shuo & Pan, Haihua. 2009. Hanyu wuding zhuyu de yuyi yunzhun fenxi [The semantic licensing conditions of indefinite subjects in Mandarin Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2009(6). 528–537.
Lu, Xiaofei. 2004. On the distribution of Chinese number expressions. In Tur, Sylwia & Levi, Susannah (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Northwest Linguistics Conference, 145–160. Seattle: University of Washington.
Meier, Cécile. 2003. The meaning of too, enough, and so…that
. Natural Language Semantics 11(1). 69–107.
Paris, Marie-Claude. 1985. The semantics of jiu and cai in Mandarin Chinese. Computational Analyses of Asian and African Languages 241. 181–196.
Partee, Barbara. 1995. Quantificational structures and compositionality. In Bach, Emmon & Jelinek, Eloise & Kratzer, Angelika & Partee, Barbara (eds.), Quantification in natural languages, 541–601. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
van Rooij, Robert & Schulz, Katrin. 2017. Topic, focus, and exhaustive interpretation. In Lee, Chungmin & Kiefer, Ferenc & Krifka, Manfred (eds.), Contrastiveness in information structure, alternatives and scalar implicatures, 63–82. Cham: Springer.
Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Scha, Remko. 1981. Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification. In Groenendijk, Jeroen & Janssen, Theo M. V. & Stokhof, Martin J. B. (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language, 483–512. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Mathematisch Centrum.
Simpson, Andrew. 2012. The silence of the bucks: A note on Kayne’s “Grand and its silent entourage”. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33(2). 87–101.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2001. On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantics interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10(2). 129–168.
. 2008. Object specificity in Chinese: A view from the vP periphery. The Linguistic Review 25(3–4). 479–502.
Xiang, Yimei. 2016. Interpreting questions with non-exhaustive answers. Cambridge: Harvard University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Xu, Liejiong. 1997. Limitations on subjecthood of numerically quantified noun phrases: A pragmatic approach. In Xu, Liejiong (ed.), The referential properties of Chinese noun phrases, 25–44. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.
Yao, Shuiying. 2010. Stage/individual-level predicates, topics and indefinite subjects. In Otoguro, Ryo & Ishikawa, Kiyoshi & Umemoto, Hiroshi & Yoshimoto, Kei & Harada, Yasunari (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 573–582. Tokyo: Institute of Digital Enhancement of Cognitive Processing, Waseda University.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Chen, Yi-Hsun
2025. A unified semantic account of Mandarin ordinal phrases. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 26:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
