Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 21:4 (2020) ► pp.655–687
Plurality and definiteness in Chengdu Chinese
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 18 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00074.xio
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00074.xio
Abstract
The authors identify a plural marker -ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese that can apply to both count and mass nouns, encoding plurality as well as definiteness. This post-nominal -ɕiɛ differs from the pre-nominal ɕiɛ, as the latter is purely plural but not inherently definite. Our analysis shows that the pre-nominal ɕiɛ functions as a quantifier, which occupies the [Spec, NumP] position, whereas the suffixal -ɕiɛ, by virtue of being a plural marker, is base-generated in the Num0 position and move to D0 to encode both plurality and definiteness. Moreover, the two ɕiɛs can co-occur in one and the same nominal phrase, exhibiting the double definiteness effect. The syntactic analysis of ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese, coupled with the study of di in Cantonese, has theoretical impacts on nominal phrase structures, in particular, on “plurality” and “definiteness”. First, plural markers in classifier languages contrast with those in number languages, as the former, but not the latter, defies numerical modification. Second, definiteness can be expressed by a non-D element, which may check its [+def] feature either by undergoing an upward movement to D (or [Spec, DP]) or by agreeing with the [+def] feature of a demonstrative. Third, the DP-NP distinction is strongly supported by our account of Chengdu Chinese.
Keywords: plurality, definiteness, ɕiɛ, Chengdu Chinese, di, Cantonese
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data presentation
- 2.1The quantifier ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese
- 2.2The plural marker -ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese
- 3.Syntactic analysis of ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese
- 3.1The quantifier ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese
- 3.2The plural marker -ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese
- 4.More on plurality: Syntactic analysis of di in Cantonese
- 4.1Data presentation of di
- 4.2Data analysis of di
- 4.3A comparison between di and ɕiɛ
- 5.Theoretical impacts
- 5.1On plurality
- 5.2On definiteness
- 6.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (52)
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2011. The aspectual properties of nominalization structures. In Galani, Alexandra & Hicks, Glyn & Tsoulas, George (eds.), Morphology and its interfaces (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 178), 195–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Athanasiadou, Ifigeneia & Athanasopoulos, Panos. 2017. Plural mass nouns and the construal of individuation: Crosslinguistic evidence from verbal and nonverbal behaviour in labelling and non-labelling contexts. Cognitive Semantics 3(1). 62–94.
Au Yeung, Wai Hoo. 2005. An interface program for parameterization of classifiers in Chinese. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Bošković, Željko. 2005. On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59(1). 1–45.
. 2008. What will you have, DP or NP? In Elfner, Emily & Walkow, Martin (eds.), NELS 37: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 11, 101–114. Amherst: GLSA.
Chacón, Dustin Alfonso. 2011. Head movement in the Bangla DP. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 4(1). 3–25.
Cheng, L.-S. Lisa & Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6(4). 339–405.
Doron, Edit & Müller, Ana. 2013. The cognitive basis of the mass-count distinction: Evidence from bare nouns. In Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia & Zribi-Hertz, Anne (eds.), Crosslinguistic studies on noun phrase structure and reference, 73–101. Leiden: Brill.
Ghaniabadi, Saeed. 2012. Plural marking beyond count nouns. In Massam, Diane (ed.), Count and mass across languages, 112–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ghomeshi, Jila. 2003. Plural marking, indefiniteness, and the noun phrase. Studia Linguistica 57(2). 47–74.
Giusti, Giuliana. 1995. A unified structural representation of (abstract) case and article: Evidence from Germanic. In Haider, Hubert & Olsen, Susan & Vikner, Sten (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31), 77–93. Dordrecht: Springer.
. 1997. The categorial status of determiners. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 95–123. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
. 2015. Nominal syntax at the interfaces: A comparative analysis of languages with articles. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Her, One-Soon. 2012a. Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua 122(14). 1668–1691.
. 2012b. Structure of classifiers and measure words: A lexical functional account. Language and Linguistics 13(6). 1211–1251.
Heycock, Caroline & Zamparelli, Roberto. 2005. Friends and colleagues: Plurality, coordination and the structure of DP. Natural Language Semantics 13(3). 201–270.
Huang, Chu-Ren & Ahrens, Kathleen. 2003. Individuals, kinds and events: Classifier coercion of nouns. Language Sciences 25(4). 353–373.
Iljic, Robert. 1994. Quantification in Mandarin Chinese: Two markers of plurality. Linguistics 32(1). 91–116.
. 2001. The problem of the suffix -men in Chinese grammar. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 29(1). 11–68.
Julien, Marit. 2005. Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Krifka, Manfred. 1995. Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and English. In Carlson, Gregory N. & Pelletier, Francis Jeffry (eds.), The generic book, 398–411. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
. 2003. Bare NPs: Kind-referring, indefinites, both, or neither? In Young, Robert B. & Zhou, Yuping (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT XIII), 180–203. Ithaca: Cornell University.
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1998. Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4). 693–702.
Liao, Wei-wen Roger. 2011. The symmetry of syntactic relations. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 609–665.
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia. 2011. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Ojeda, Almerindo E. 2005. The paradox of mass plurals. In Mufwene, Salikoko S. & Francis, Elaine J. & Wheeler, Rebecca S. (eds.), Polymorphous linguistics: Jim McCawley’s legacy, 389–410. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Rijkhoff, Jan. 1999. When can a language have adjectives? An implicational universal. In Vogel, Petra M. & Comrie, Bernard (eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes, 217–257. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Roehrs, Dorian. 2009. Demonstratives and definite articles as nominal auxiliaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rothstein, Susan. 2017. Semantics for counting and measuring: Key topics in semantics and pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rullmann, Hotze & You, Aili. 2006. General number and the semantics and pragmatics of indefinite bare nouns in Mandarin Chinese. In Von Heusinger, Klaus & Turner, Ken (eds.), Where semantics meets pragmatics, 175–196. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Steindl, Ulrike. 2010. Grammatical issues in the Chinese classifier system: The case of classifier reduplication. Vienna: Universität Wien. (Master’s thesis.)
Stowell, Tim. 1989. Subjects, specifiers and X-bar theory. In Baltin, Mark R. & Kroch, Anthony S. (eds.). Alternative conceptions of phrase structure, 232–262. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
. 1991. Determiners in NP and DP. In Leffel, Katherine & Bouchard, Denis (eds.), Views on phrase structure (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25), 37–56. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 1992. Combinatory grammar and projection from the lexicon. In Sag, Ivan A. & Szabolcsi, Anna (eds.), Lexical matters (CSLI Lecture Notes 24), 241–268. Stanford: CSLI.
. 1994. The noun phrase. In Kiefer, Ferenc & Kiss, Katalin E. (eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian (Syntax and Semantics 27), 179–274. New York: Academic Press.
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2001. Nominal predication and focus anchoring. In Jäger, Gerhard & Strigin, Anatoli & Wilder, Chris & Zhang, Niina (eds.), Papers on predicative constructions: Proceedings of the Workshop on Secondary Predication (ZAS Papers in Linguistics 22), 159–172. Berlin: Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.
Tsoulas, George. 2006. Plurality of mass nouns and the grammar of number. (Paper presented at the 29th GLOW Colloquium, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 6–8 April 2006.)
. 2009. On the grammar of number and mass terms in Greek. In Halpert, Clair & Hartman, Jeremy & Hill, David (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics: Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop in Greek Syntax and Semantics at MIT, vol. 571, 333–348. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Vinet, Marie-Thérèse & Liu, Xiaoyan. 2008. Plurality in Chinese with a restricted class of noun-classifier words. In Clarke, Sarah & Hirayama, Manami & Kim, Kyumin & Suh, Eugenia (eds.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 28: Proceedings of the International Conference on East Asian Linguistics, 357–373. Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.
Watanabe, Akira. 2017. The mass/count distinction in Japanese from the perspective of partitivity. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). 1–26. (Article 98).
Wei, Ting-Chi. 2007. Nominal predicates in Mandarin Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 5(2). 85–130.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
