Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 21:1 (2020) ► pp.80–103
Two types of aa3-nominals in Cantonese
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 2 January 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00058.sio
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00058.sio
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the grammatical properties of the Cantonese aa3, a nominal
element that only attaches itself to [+human] nouns. We provide evidence to show that there are in fact two types of
aa3-nominals. Their syntactic and semantic properties correlate with the number of syllables they consist of.
There is a two-way split between disyllabic aa3-nominals and multisyllabic aa3-nominals.
Aa3 in disyllabic aa3-nominals should be treated as a prosodic template filler while
aa3 in multisyllabic aa3-nominals occupies a syntactic position in the referential layer of
the Chinese nominal.
Keywords: proper names, phonological filler, dialectal grammar, Cantonese, familiarity
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.An overview
- 3.Previous analyses
- 4.Disyllabic aa3-nominals vs. multisyllabic aa3-nominals
- 4.1Compatibility with classifiers
- 4.2Ability to be non-referential
- 4.3Possessor reference possibility
- 5.Disyllabic aa3-nominals
- 6.Multisyllabic aa3-nominals
- 6.1Not just definite
- 6.2Resistance to modification
- 6.3Analysis
- 7.Some consequences and loose ends
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (25)
Abbott, Barbara. 2002. Discussion Note: Definiteness and proper names: Some bad news for descriptive theory. Journal of Semantics 19(2). 191–201.
Brown, Roger & Gilman, Albert. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in language, 253–276. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1990. Feature geometry of vowels and co-occurrence restrictions in Cantonese. (Paper presented at the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 9, Stanford, 2–4 March 1990.)
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542.
Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria & Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Feng, Shengli. 2009. Minimal word and its function in Mandarin Chinese. In Xing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), Studies of Chinese linguistics: Functional approaches, 47–64. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Geurts, Bart. 1997. Good news about the description theory of names. Journal of Semantics 14(4). 319–348.
Heim, Irene Roswitha. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Huang, Borong (ed.). 1996. Hanyu fangyan yufa lei bian [Classified materials on Chinese dialect grammar], Qingdao: Qingdao Publishing House.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 609–665.
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia. 2011. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Prince, Ellen F. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status. In Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text, 295–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sio, Joanna Ut-Seong. 2003. Two types of possessive constructions in Cantonese. In Lin, Yen-Hwei (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteen North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 313–330. Los Angeles: GSIL Publications, University of Southern California.
. 2010. Syntax of [+human] terms in Cantonese. In Wilder, Chris & Åfarli, Tor Anders (eds.), Chinese matters: From grammar to first and second language acquisition, 15–27. Norway: Tapir Academic Press.
Sybesma, Rint & Li, Boya. 2007. The dissection and structural mapping of Cantonese sentence final particles. Lingua 117(10). 1739–1783.
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2011. A parametric approach to NP ellipsis in Mandarin and Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20(2). 107–115.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
