Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 21:1 (2020) ► pp.1–32
Left is right, right is not
On the constituency of the classifier phrase in Chinese
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 2 January 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00046.her
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00046.her
Abstract
This paper argues for the left-branching constituency of the Chinese classifier phrase and demonstrates that the
right-branching approach assumed by the majority of current syntactic works is not viable. The rejection of the right-branching
approach entails the rejection of the “split” approach, where both left- and right-branching structures are required. In this
debate, we offer a vital fresh perspective from the syntax and mathematics of complex numerals. We examine the right-branching
argumentation in . 2014. Structure of noun phrases: Left or right? Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 12(2). 1–32., which, crucially, extends Ionin, Tania & Matushansky, Ora. 2006. The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics 23(4). 315–360. non-constituent account of complex numerals, e.g. two
hundred, in non-classifier languages like English to Chinese and must rely on ellipsis and a silent element YIDIAR ‘a
bit’. Yet, complex numerals in Chinese, e.g. liang bai ‘200’, are in fact constituents (He, Chuansheng. 2015. Complex numerals in Mandarin Chinese are constituents. Lingua 1641. 189–214. ), and the alleged YIDIAR ‘a bit’ does affect the semantics of the noun phrase and is thus by
definition illicit (Her, One-Soon & Tsai, Hui-Chin. 2014. Color isn’t silent, shallow isn’t deep: Two case studies of evaluating silent elements. Language and Linguistics 15(6). 775–800. ; . 2015. On silent elements: A case study of grand and its silent entourage. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33(2). 575–605. ). Other evidence comes from Chinese synchronic and diachronic syntax as well as the typology of classifier word
orders. While the overall argumentation centers on Chinese, it has significant cross-linguistic implications.
Keywords: numeral classifier, complex numerals, left-branching, right-branching
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Two camps, four positions
- 3.Constituency of complex numerals
- 3.1A multiplicative theory of C/M and its implications on C/M constituency
- 3.2Ionin & Matushansky (2006): Non-constituent account of English numerals
- 3.3He’s (2015): Constituency account of Chinese numerals
- 3.4Extending the constituency of complex numerals to [Num C/M] in Chinese
- 3.5Complex numerals and C/M word order typology
- 4.Revisiting A. Li (2014)
- 4.1Evidence from ban/duo ‘half/more’
- 4.2Property-denoting [Num C/M] phrases
- 4.3Phonologically-inserted de in the C/M phrase
- 4.4The discrepancy between Cs and Ms
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (61)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Au Yeung, Wai Hoo Ben. 2005. An interface program for parameterization of classifiers in Chinese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Bhattacharya, Tanmoy. 1999. The structure of the Bangla DP. London: University College London. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2001. Numeral/quantifier-classifier as a complex head. In van Riemsdijk, Henk & Corver, Norbert (eds.), Semi-lexical heads, 191–221. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chan, Eugene S. L. 2016. Numeral systems of the world’s languages. ([URL]) (Accessed 2018-07-17).
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint. 1998. Yi-wan tang, yi-ge tang: Classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies (New Series) 28(3). 385–412.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3). 315–332.
Comrie, Bernard. 2006. Numbers, language, and culture. (Paper presented at the 16th Jyväskylä Summer School, Jyväskylä, 24 July-11 August 2006.)
. 2016. Numeral bases. In Dryer, Mathew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. ([URL]) (Accessed 2018-07-17).
Fukui, Naoki & Takano, Yuji. 2000. Nominal structure: An extension of the symmetry principle. In Svenonius, Peter (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, 219–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1990[1972]. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. In Denning, K. & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 166–193. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (First published 1972 in Working Papers on Language Universals 91. 1–39.)
1990[1978]. Generalizations about numeral systems. In Denning, K. & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 271–309. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (First published 1978 in Universals of human language, vol. 3: Word Structure, 249–295. Stanford: Stanford University Press.)
Grimshaw, Jane. 2000. Locality and extended projection. In Coopmans, Peter & Everaert, Martin B. H. & Grimshaw, Jane (eds.), Lexical specification and insertion, 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2016. Lun hanyu shu-liang zuhe de chengfen wanzhengxing. [On the constituenthood of the numeral-classifier combinations in Chinese]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 18(1). 1–18.
He, Chuansheng & Her, One-Soon & Hu, Xiaoshi & Zhu, Weijing. 2017. Overt coordination in additive numerals of minority languages in South China. Syntax 20(3). 292–316.
Her, One-Soon. 2012a. Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua 122(14). 1668–1691.
. 2012b. Structure of classifiers and measure words: A lexical functional account. Language and Linguistics 13(6). 1211–1251.
. 2017a. Deriving classifier word order typology, or Greenberg’s Universal 20A, and universal 20. Linguistics 55(2). 265–303.
. 2017b. Structure of numerals and numeral classifiers in Chinese: Historical and typological perspectives and cross-linguistic implications. Language and Linguistics 18(1). 26–71.
Her, One-Soon & Hsieh, Chen-Tien. 2010. On the semantic distinction between classifiers and measure words in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 11(3). 527–551.
Her, One-Soon & Tsai, Hui-Chin. 2014. Color isn’t silent, shallow isn’t deep: Two case studies of evaluating silent elements. Language and Linguistics 15(6). 775–800.
. 2015. On silent elements: A case study of grand and its silent entourage. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33(2). 575–605.
Her, One-Soon & Chen, Jing-Perng & Tsai, Hui-Chin. 2015. Justifying silent elements in syntax: The case of a silent numeral, a silent classifier, and two silent nouns in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2(2). 193–226.
Her, One-Soon & Tsai, Hui-Chin & Lin, Kun-Han & Tang, Marc & Lee, Meng-Chang. 2016. Numeral bases and numeral classifiers in SMATTI: Word order variation in Tibeto-Burman. (Paper presented at the conference of New Ways of Analyzing Variation–Asia Pacific 4 (NWAV AP4), Chiayi, 22–24 April 2016.)
Hsieh, Miao-Ling. 2008. In Her, One-Soon & Chui, Kawai (eds.), The internal structure of noun phrases in Chinese (Taiwan Journal of Linguistics: Book Series in Chinese Linguistics 2). Taipei: Crane Publishing.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Yen-Hui Audrey & Li, Yafei. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, C.-T. James & Ochi, Masao. 2011. Classifiers and nominal structure: A parametric approach and its consequences. In Gao, Ming-le (ed.), Universals and variation (Proceedings of GLOW in Asia VIII, 2010), 191–197. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
. 2001. Numeral systems. In Smelser, Neil J. & Baltes, Paul B. (eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 10756–10761. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ionin, Tania & Matushansky, Ora. 2006. The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics 23(4). 315–360.
Jenks, Peter. 2010. Evidence for the syntactic diversity of numeral classifiers. (Paper presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the LSA, Baltimore, 7–10 January 2010.)
Jiang, L. Julie. 2008. Monotonicity and measure phrases in Chinese. (Paper presented at the 11th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics (IsCLL-11), Hsinchu, 23–25 May 2008.)
Kayne, Richard S. 2006b. On parameters and on principles of pronunciation. In Hans Broekhuis & Corver, Norbert & Huybregts, Riny & Kleinhenz, Ursula & Koster, Jan (eds.), Organizing grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, 289–299. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2006a. A note on the syntax of numerical bases. In Suzuki, Yubun & Mizuno, Keizo & Takami, Ken-ichi (eds.), Gengo kagaku no shinzui o motomete: Nakajima Heizo Kyoju kanreki kinen ronbunshu [In search of the essence language science : Festschrift for professor Heizo Nakazima on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday], 21–41. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.
Li, Charles & Thompson, Sandra. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Li, Xu-Ping. 2011. On the semantics of classifiers in Chinese. Israel: Bar-Ilan University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Li, Xu-Ping & Rothstein, Susan. 2012. Measure readings of Mandarin classifier phrases and the particle de. Language and Linguistics 13(4). 693–741.
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1999. Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8(1). 75–99.
Lin, Jo-Wang. 1997. Chinese noun phrase structure: DP or NP? In Tsao, Feng-fu & Wang, H. Samuel (eds.), Chinese language and linguistics III: Morphology and lexicon, 31. 401–434. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Liu, Yi-Hsien. 2013. A unified syntactic account of Mandarin subject nominals. Los Angles: University of Southern California. (Doctoral Dissertation.)
Muromatsu, Keiko. 1998. On the syntax of classifiers. Maryland: University of Maryland. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Peyraube, Alain. 1998. On the history of classifiers in archaic and medieval Chinese. In T’sou, Benjamin K. (ed.), Studia linguistica serica, 39–68. Hong Kong: Language Information Sciences Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1977. Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Culicover, Peter W. & Wasow, Thomas & Akmajian, Adrian (eds.), Formal syntax, 285–316. New York: Academic Press.
Simpson, Andrew. 2005. Classifiers and DP structure in Southeast Asia. In Cinque, Guglielmo & Kayne, Richard (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 806–838. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 1996. Ta maile bi shizhi and Chinese phrase structure. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 67(3). 445–502.
. 2005. Nouns or classifiers: A non-movement analysis of classifiers in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 6(3). 431–472.
Watanabe, Akira. 2006. Functional projections of nominals in Japanese: Syntax of classifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24(1). 241–306.
Yang, Rong. 2001. Common nouns, classifiers, and quantification in Chinese. New Jersey: The State University of New Jersey. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Cao, Zi‐Yun & One‐Soon Her
Ran, Chen
2025. Num-Cl adjacency and the morphological movement of numerals in Mandarin. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 26:2 ► pp. 262 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
