Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 20:3 (2019) ► pp.451–468
格西霍爾語動詞的時與體
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Article language: Chinese
Published online: 14 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00040.tia
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00040.tia
抽象
霍爾語是四川境內較少人知的語群,屬於漢藏語系羌語支嘉戎語組。本文首度詳細介紹中部霍爾語格西話動詞的時-體範疇。保守的嘉戎語組語言,動詞均採「三分式」時-體系統,一般以方向前綴區別完整體與非完整體,以不同的詞幹標記過去與非過去時。相較於這種保守的形態格局,格西話動詞的時-體系統有數項重要的創新:(一)動詞詞幹交替大幅簡化,標註時間的功能基本喪失;(二)方向前綴從體標記轉成「相對過去時」標記,可通用的相對過去前綴də-開始逐步取代其他前綴,且有聚焦於動作結果的延伸功能;(三)以贅語式造出一般非完整體及「持續體」構造。這些重要的創新既源自內部衍變的機制,也明顯受到本地主流藏語的接觸影響。
On tense and aspect in the Gaxi Horpa verb
On tense and aspect in the Gexi Horpa verb
Horpa is a little-studied language cluster in Sichuan falling under the Rgyalrongic subgroup in Sino-Tibetan. This study is a first attempt to explicate the verbal tense-aspect system of Gexi, a variety of Central Horpa in the Horpa language cluster. Conservative Rgyalrongic languages generally utilize a tripartite tense-aspect system with an aspectual (perfective vs. imperfective) distinction marked by prefixes, and a tense distinction marked by means of stem alternation. The Gexi tense-aspect system deviates drastically from the pan-Rgyalrongic norm, owing to a number of striking innovations it has undergone: (a) a sweeping reduction of stem variation leading to atrophy of tense-marking via stem alternations; (b) transformation of the pan-Rgyalrongic perfective structure into an anterior (relative past) verb form and development of the prefix də- into a general anterior prefix, often carrying an extended resultative marking function; (c) innovation of a periphrastic imperfective and a related durative imperfective. The important morphological innovations identified in this article appear to be inherently motivated as well as induced from contact with the locally dominant Tibetan language.
Article outline
- 1.引言
- 2.格西話時-體系統的特殊發展
- 2.1動詞詞幹交替萎縮
- 2.2體前綴轉變為相對時標記
- 2.3新生贅語式非完整體
- 2.4持續體
- 3.前綴də-的特殊用法
- 3.1作為通用過去時標記
- 3.2標記情境的結果
- 4.其他時-體的語意
- 5.結語
- 謝辭
- 笔记
參考文獻
References (21)
Bybee, Joan L. & Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1). 51–103.
Bybee, Joan L. & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gates, Jesse. 2013. Intelligibility, identity, and structure in Western rGyalrongic. (Talk presented at the 3rd Workshop on Sino-Tibetan Languages of Sichuan, Paris, 2–4, September 2013.)
Gengawengmu (根呷翁姆). 2010. Daofuyu diaocha (xia) 道孚語調查(下) [Investigations on Daofu language (Part 2)]. Sichuan Minzu Xueyuan Xuebao 四川民族學院學報 [Journal of Sichuan University for Nationalities] 19(4). 7–14.
Hill, Nathan W. 2012. “Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 389–433.
Huang, Bufan (黃布凡). 1991. Daofuyu 道孚語 [The Daofu language]. In Dai, Qingxia (戴慶廈) (ed.), Zangmianyu shiwu zhong 藏緬語十五種 [Fifteen Tibeto-Burman languages], 1–45. Beijing: Beijing Yanshan Press.
. 2007. Lawurongyu yanjiu 拉塢戎語研究 [A study of Lavrong language]. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.
Jacques, Guillaume (向柏霖). 2008. Jiarongyu yanjiu 嘉戎語研究 [A study of the rGyalrong language]. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2017. rGyalrong language. In Sybesma, Rint & Behr, Wolfgang & Gu, Yueguo & Handel, Zev & Huang, C. -T. James & Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol. 31, 583–589. Leiden: Brill.
Jacques, Guillaume & Lai, Yunfan & Antonov, Anton & Lobsang Nima. 2017. Stau (Ergong, Horpa). In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 597–613. New York: Routledge.
Lai, Yunfan. 2015. The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3). 271–285.
Lazard, Gilbert. 1999. Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other? Linguistic Typology 3(1). 91–109.
Lin, You-Jing. 2003. Tense and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong verb. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale [East Asian Languages and Linguistics] 32(2). 245–286.
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2000a. Parallelisms in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics 1(1). 161–190.
2000b. Stem alternations in Puxi verb inflection: Toward validating the rGyalrongic subgroup in Qiangic. Language and Linguistics 1(2). 211–232.
Sun, Jackson T.-S. (孫天心). 2008. Caodeng Jiarongyu dongci de shi-te fanchou 草登嘉戎語動詞的時-體範疇 [Verbal tense-aspect categories in Caodeng rGyalrong], Hanzangyu Xuebao 漢藏語學報 [Journal of Sino-Tibetan Linguistics] 21. 135–146.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Gates, Jesse P.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
